Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
I guess I will call it good scouting by the Cardinals. Neither Roby nor Saggese were top 100 prospects anywhere when the deal was made, but both made the BA Top 100 list before the 2024 season…

 

the Cardinals signing Sonny Gray has worked out well for them too.

  • Replies 6.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted
the Cardinals signing Sonny Gray has worked out well for them too.

 

Not a surprise. Gray was the AL Cy Younnf runner-up, AL ERA runner-up, and got MVP votes…

Community Moderator
Posted
Jays have been overrated for a long ass time. Rays are down for now, time to strike. Houston isn't in our division so we can't worry about them.

 

Might be a Captain Obvious take, but I think the Rays and Jays are the teams we have to finish ahead of this year to make the playoffs.

Community Moderator
Posted
Might be a Captain Obvious take, but I think the Rays and Jays are the teams we have to finish ahead of this year to make the playoffs.

 

At least one of them.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Don't sell. Just let these guys sit on the bench through September on a losing team then. Sounds great. Why get a return at all?

 

They should have kept Vazquez!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

If you’re not going to play to get in, and win then don’t play at all. The last two years the Red Sox were in shouting distance at the trade deadline you know when you were predicting the 80+ wins last year. It didn’t work out, and the Red Sox dropped off after the trade deadline. The players were pissed when Vaz got traded, so at the time NO. It’s worked out good since though.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Jays have been overrated for a long ass time. Rays are down for now, time to strike. Houston isn't in our division so we can't worry about them.

 

Houston doesn’t have to be in our Div to get a wildcard. I’m not even thinking about the Div. A little dab will do ya, so any wildcard spot will do.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Expendable guys or Potential Rule 5:

Hickey

Kavadas

Jordan

Yorke

Bastardo

Castro

Gambrell

Lugo

Zeferjahn

 

Lugo is making a strong bud to grab opposing scouts’ attention.

 

No one listed Fitts. Untouchable?

Posted

Minor League stats can be very deceiving, in terms of trade value of prospects.

 

How many of our top OPS guys have high trade value?

 

Woo

1.194 E Valdez (only 20 PAs)

1.079 Romy (over 40 PAs and on IL)

1.058 Kavadas (not much trade value, if any)

.969 Bobby Dee (replacement level player)

 

Meidroth .810 and Hickey .738 might have some trade value.

 

POR (These top two could have been traded, last winter, and nobody would have batted an eye.)

1.248 M Lugo

.912 Paulino

.883 Gasper

 

Jordan at .792 and Yorke at .737 might have some trade value.

Mayer .743, Teel .735 and Anthony .691 have the highest value,

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Teams that are in sell mode at the deadline usually trade expiring contracts and obtain prospects, no?

 

No problem with that if the Red Sox didn’t have any chance at the Postseason, but the last two years the Red Sox did. Didn’t Raffy, and some other players say they needed help last year at the deadline? Like I keep saying if you’re not playing to get in it then why play at all.

Posted
Teams that are in sell mode at the deadline usually trade expiring contracts and obtain prospects, no?

 

Those are the most common trades, yes.

 

Schwarber was one.

Nate and Pearce were two.

 

Then, there are a few like Workman & Hembree for Pivetta (not a prospect.)

Old-Timey Member
Posted
What percentage THC?

 

You'd have to ask Lugo. If you need to find him, look on base. He's there about 43% of the time...

Posted

Lugo made it up to 11th in the system, way back in 2019. He dropped out of the top 20 for a bit, but he was back at #14 by the end of 2022.

 

He was 12th to start 2023 but then dropped out of even the top 30, last summer and fall, and a no show in Spring 2024.

 

My guess is, he will crack the top 20 or 30, again, this summer.

Posted
I don't know where we'll be at the deadline. It's too hard to say what this team will look like due to all the injuries. If they suck: sell. If they are very good: buy. In between: up for discussion.

 

It's just about that simple.

Community Moderator
Posted
Lugo is making a strong bud to grab opposing scouts’ attention.

 

No one listed Fitts. Untouchable?

 

I don't know if Lugo has a spot here because he seems to be limited defensively from what I remember, but he's still young. He's Rule 5 eligible this offseason, so there's a chance he could be picked. If he keeps swinging a big stick, maybe you could move him for something?

 

I just figured it'd be silly to move a real starting pitching prospect that is so close to MLB. This isn't a WS contending team, so I don't know what kind of trade they'd be pursuing, but Fitts seems better here for now.

Community Moderator
Posted
Minor League stats can be very deceiving, in terms of trade value of prospects.

 

How many of our top OPS guys have high trade value?

 

Woo

1.194 E Valdez (only 20 PAs)

1.079 Romy (over 40 PAs and on IL)

1.058 Kavadas (not much trade value, if any)

.969 Bobby Dee (replacement level player)

 

Meidroth .810 and Hickey .738 might have some trade value.

 

POR (These top two could have been traded, last winter, and nobody would have batted an eye.)

1.248 M Lugo

.912 Paulino

.883 Gasper

 

Jordan at .792 and Yorke at .737 might have some trade value.

Mayer .743, Teel .735 and Anthony .691 have the highest value,

 

Valdez? Marginal trade value as he's a platoon DH.

Romy has no trade value. He's a DFA candidate.

Kavadas has less trade value than Valdez, but more than Romy.

Dalbec has no trade value. He's a DFA candidate.

 

Why move Meidroth if he's not Rule 5 eligible? Keep him another season and see if he develops more power.

 

Nobody would have wanted Lugo last year as he was a part time player who wasn't playing well at all.

 

Paulino is playing better this year. His glove is a good carrying tool and he can carve out a UTIL role somewhere, maybe even here.

 

Jordan and Yorke have some trade value, but teams aren't drooling over them.

Community Moderator
Posted
Lugo made it up to 11th in the system, way back in 2019. He dropped out of the top 20 for a bit, but he was back at #14 by the end of 2022.

 

He was 12th to start 2023 but then dropped out of even the top 30, last summer and fall, and a no show in Spring 2024.

 

My guess is, he will crack the top 20 or 30, again, this summer.

 

Top 20? Not a chance.

Posted

This may drive the number crunchers crazy, but if a team plays all 162 scheduled games in a season, can it ever finish three games over .500?

 

Three wins better than break-even 81-81 is a record of 84-78 -- good enough to get the D-backs into the '23 World Series. But say a club is .500 at 78-78 -- and then wins its final six... isn't that six games over .500? Or just six better than .500?

 

82-80, two game diff; 83-79, four game diff... if the Sox are on pace for either, they probably still don't get a wild card game. These are the projections that can get 18 Asst. VPs arguing about buying or selling... or closing up Blooms like tulips on cold Spring nights.

Verified Member
Posted
This may drive the number crunchers crazy, but if a team plays all 162 scheduled games in a season, can it ever finish three games over .500?

 

Three wins better than break-even 81-81 is a record of 84-78 -- good enough to get the D-backs into the '23 World Series. But say a club is .500 at 78-78 -- and then wins its final six... isn't that six games over .500? Or just six better than .500?

 

82-80, two game diff; 83-79, four game diff... if the Sox are on pace for either, they probably still don't get a wild card game. These are the projections that can get 18 Asst. VPs arguing about buying or selling... or closing up Blooms like tulips on cold Spring nights.

 

You know, once in a while, someone says something really interesting on this board! Damn, you're right!!!

Old-Timey Member
Posted
This may drive the number crunchers crazy, but if a team plays all 162 scheduled games in a season, can it ever finish three games over .500?

 

Three wins better than break-even 81-81 is a record of 84-78 -- good enough to get the D-backs into the '23 World Series. But say a club is .500 at 78-78 -- and then wins its final six... isn't that six games over .500? Or just six better than .500?

 

82-80, two game diff; 83-79, four game diff... if the Sox are on pace for either, they probably still don't get a wild card game. These are the projections that can get 18 Asst. VPs arguing about buying or selling... or closing up Blooms like tulips on cold Spring nights.

 

No because of how they phrase it.

 

A team finishing 84-78 is said to be 6 games above .500. But an 81-81 team is only 3 games behind them despite being .500. Where did those other 3 games go? Did the bellhop take them?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
notin makes the funniest typos, I try to let them go but sometimes I can't help myself.

 

Don’t blame me. Blame the duckhead who put the “i” and the “u” next to each other on the keyboard…

Community Moderator
Posted
Don’t blame me. Blame the duckhead who put the “i” and the “u” next to each other on the keyboard…

 

Señor QWERTY.

Community Moderator
Posted
This may drive the number crunchers crazy, but if a team plays all 162 scheduled games in a season, can it ever finish three games over .500?

 

Three wins better than break-even 81-81 is a record of 84-78 -- good enough to get the D-backs into the '23 World Series. But say a club is .500 at 78-78 -- and then wins its final six... isn't that six games over .500? Or just six better than .500?

 

82-80, two game diff; 83-79, four game diff... if the Sox are on pace for either, they probably still don't get a wild card game. These are the projections that can get 18 Asst. VPs arguing about buying or selling... or closing up Blooms like tulips on cold Spring nights.

 

Manfred just hasn't figured out a way to do ties yet!

Posted
You know, once in a while, someone says something really interesting on this board! Damn, you're right!!!

 

mvp 78 already said it and in fewer words.

 

In the AL it's tough to get a wild card bid with less than 90 wins and a winning percentage of .556. Right now the Sox are @ .543. Last year the Jays were a wild card with 89 wins and a winning percentage of .549.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...