Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted
We're all free to speculate our asses off, when it comes to that.

 

I think the days of $200mill payrolls are over for a while. It’s possible Henry frees up the cash if remaining cheap does not produce winning teams at some point. But if they win cheaply, it absolutely pushes that date back.

 

And I think Henry will go through multiple front offices to find someone who can win cheaply before he reinstated lofty payrolls again…

Posted
Why not?

 

Sale and Kluber had a lot in common. Two aging pitchers who once dominated the AL but both pitching sparingly in recent years due to a combination of age and injury…

 

Well, I didn't think the Kluber signing was horrible in itself. It was the fact that it was the only signing that bothered me. You can't have enough pitching is still a principle that makes sense. Trading Sale went against that principle.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Plus Sale's numbers would indicate that what he's doing is working just fine. I thought Bailey's philosophy was for guys to do what they do best.

 

Had it worked well for the last 4 years on the org? Another important aspect is that these guys are people, not robots. With the way the last couple of years had worked out, it's likely Sale wanted out of here too. Speculation aside, even if what he's doing is working for the Braves, it didn't fit for this system. There were just too many downsides to consider when you take into account, they really liked Grissom (with reason) and he may still work out.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Yes, I do.

 

So you only buy into the parts of Bailey’s philosophy that work?

 

(This sounds condescending up front, but I would state the majority of sports’ fans have similar thoughts about some aspect of something the front office does.)

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Well, I didn't think the Kluber signing was horrible in itself. It was the fact that it was the only signing that bothered me. You can't have enough pitching is still a principle that makes sense. Trading Sale went against that principle.

 

Unless Sale got hurt.

 

I mean, if I asked you in January for a prediction for IP for 2024 for Sale and Giolito, whose would be higher?

 

 

Granted, I do believe with no evidence that the Sox don’t sign Giolito unless they move Sale…

Posted (edited)
Well, I didn't think the Kluber signing was horrible in itself. It was the fact that it was the only signing that bothered me. You can't have enough pitching is still a principle that makes sense. Trading Sale went against that principle.

 

According to Cot's, we're $18M under the cap. What I don't understand is when the front office says our budget is $220M? Is that cash or luxury tax payroll.

 

If money was not an issue, we can trade Jansen, Martin and O'Neill (I'm not proposing it) and get more in return by taking on all their dollar amounts left on their respective contracts. That probably won't happen so I'm not so sure we'll get quality prospect (s) in return. If a trading partner doesn't take on say Jansen's remaining contract for the second half obviously they maybe enticed to giving us better prospects. We're buying prospects at this point, not just trading for them.

 

Our tax payroll is $218M so $220M cap probably applies to the tax payroll.

Edited by Nick
Posted (edited)
Had it worked well for the last 4 years on the org? Another important aspect is that these guys are people, not robots. With the way the last couple of years had worked out, it's likely Sale wanted out of here too. Speculation aside, even if what he's doing is working for the Braves, it didn't fit for this system.

 

You seem to be suggesting he's applying a one size fits all approach.

 

All the quotes I see from Bailey emphasize tailoring the approach to each pitcher, finding out what they do well and having them do it a lot.

Edited by Bellhorn04
Posted
You seem to be suggesting he's applying a one size fits all approach.

 

All the quotes I see from Bailey emphasize tailoring the approach to each pitcher, finding out what they do well and having them do it a lot.

 

Exactly, and one size doesn’t fit all. It Sale would have stayed he would have pitched the same way he has always pitched, and the same way he is pitching in Atlanta.🤭🙈

Posted
According to Cot's, we're $18M under the cap. What I don't understand is when the front office says our budget is $220M? Is that cash or luxury tax payroll.

 

If money was not an issue, we can trade Jansen, Martin and O'Neill (I'm not proposing it) and get more in return by taking on all their dollar amounts left on their respective contracts. That probably won't happen so I'm not so sure we'll get quality prospect (s) in return. If a trading partner doesn't take on say Jansen's remaining contract for the second half obviously they maybe enticed to giving us better prospects. We're buying prospects at this point, not just trading for them.

 

Our tax payroll is $218M so $220M cap probably applies to the tax payroll.

 

i totally agree. they are all simply rentals and unless we retain $$ i dont see us getting much in the way of decent prospects but hey maybe some team has another " Grissom" they want to unload. As for Henry it is all about unloading more payroll.

Posted

While the Tax line shows about $218M ($18M under the first tax line,) the player 2024 payroll is about $171M. This number includes:

17 Sale

1.5 Cooper

1.0 Joely

1.0 Hosmer+Reyes+Jacques+ V Gutierrez

In total, over $20M for players not on our rooster.

 

and...

22.5 Story

18.6 Yoshida

18.0 Giolito

3.5 Whitlock

2.0 Hendriks

This is almost $65M on the IL or just came off it (Yoshida.)

 

Together, these two lists equal about $86M, which is almost exactly half of our 2024 payroll.

 

Stunning!

Posted
While the Tax line shows about $218M ($18M under the first tax line,) the player 2024 payroll is about $171M. This number includes:

17 Sale

1.5 Cooper

1.0 Joely

1.0 Hosmer+Reyes+Jacques+ V Gutierrez

In total, over $20M for players not on our rooster.

 

and...

22.5 Story

18.6 Yoshida

18.0 Giolito

3.5 Whitlock

2.0 Hendriks

This is almost $65M on the IL or just came off it (Yoshida.)

 

Together, these two lists equal about $86M, which is almost exactly half of our 2024 payroll.

 

Stunning!

 

I have to object to putting Yoshida on the second list because he had an IL stint LOL

Posted
I have to object to putting Yoshida on the second list because he had an IL stint LOL

 

LOL.

 

Not on a ledge, though, right?

 

LOL

Posted

Alert:

 

Sox are the hottest team in baseball. Currently only 1 game out of the playoffs. Casas returning soon.

 

Authorities recommend that you immediately suspend any talk of trading players and root for this team. I repeat, we are jumping ON ship.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I love young, healthy, tough players who can run. I would not trade Hamilton. Grissom may still be an asset. he is just a kid. I'm not worried at all about second base. Yoshida and to be honest with you Story would be on the table if anybody was interested. For a couple of years, Sale was the target for some due to injuries. As good as Story might be, I am for the guys that are in the lineup and don't want to come out.
Posted
Alert:

 

Sox are the hottest team in baseball. Currently only 1 game out of the playoffs. Casas returning soon.

 

Authorities recommend that you immediately suspend any talk of trading players and root for this team. I repeat, we are jumping ON ship.

 

We passed KCR, today and are in the WC3 slot by o.5 games (on KC.)

 

We have the 10th best record in MLB. (-1 from #9 MN and -2 from #8 SEA. -2.5 from ATL and -3 from MIL#6. That being said, we are also just 4.5 games from the bottom 10 in MLB.

Posted
I love young, healthy, tough players who can run. I would not trade Hamilton. Grissom may still be an asset. he is just a kid. I'm not worried at all about second base. Yoshida and to be honest with you Story would be on the table if anybody was interested. For a couple of years, Sale was the target for some due to injuries. As good as Story might be, I am for the guys that are in the lineup and don't want to come out.

 

Interesting. I think this means you're crossing Casas off your list. He can't run, and he's barely played this year.

Community Moderator
Posted
Interesting. I think this means you're crossing Casas off your list. He can't run, and he's barely played this year.

 

Casas can stay because he's a weirdo. Every good team needs a weird guy.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Interesting. I think this means you're crossing Casas off your list. He can't run, and he's barely played this year.

 

He’s just saying Casas isn’t his favorite type of player. Not that Casas needs to be publicly flogged and traded…

Community Moderator
Posted
Like Millar, Papelbon, Gomes and Manny.

 

Pedro was weirder than Millar. I don't think Pap is a weird guy, just comes across like a high school bully.

Posted
Joe Kelly was the 2018 weird guy. Not a lot of weirdness with that bunch though.

 

Good pull on 2018. I couldn't think of anyone.

Posted
I’m not sure it’s the kind of weird we’re looking for, but the Sox do have a catcher who jerks off in public as a solid weirdo.
Community Moderator
Posted
I’m not sure it’s the kind of weird we’re looking for, but the Sox do have a catcher who jerks off in public as a solid weirdo.

 

Some people like to be publicly flogged.

 

You really have a thing for this factoid jbay. Got something to admit to the rest of the class?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Interesting. I think this means you're crossing Casas off your list. He can't run, and he's barely played this year.

 

Absolutely there is no place in my plan for anyone who might potentially be a big time hitter for us.lol I think that most here understand me fairly well but for you I will try to be more specific.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
He’s just saying Casas isn’t his favorite type of player. Not that Casas needs to be publicly flogged and traded…

 

thank you notin - I've been away for awhile. Maybe I need to change my approach - nope not likely to happen.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Casas can stay because he's a weirdo. Every good team needs a weird guy.

 

I thought Duran was the weird guy. I'm going to have to get to know them better.

Community Moderator
Posted
I thought Duran was the weird guy. I'm going to have to get to know them better.

 

He seems to be a very normal SoCal guy.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
He seems to be a very normal SoCal guy.

 

Is there such a thing? Pretty sure that what is normal where I am is not particularly considered normal to the people of SoCal.:P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...