Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
not a top of the rotation one. People have been saying that for years but teams are loathe to give up top young arms

 

Here are the top pitchers by fWAR from 2023-2024 and how they were acquired:

 

Wheeler: Traded to Mets in '11/ FA '19

S Gray: Traded '17, traded '19, traded '22, FA '24

Z Gallen: Traded '17, traded '19

L Webb: Drafted

Gausman: FA '19, FA '20, FA '21

Z Eflin: Traded '14 (twice), FA '22 (not expensive)

Strider: Drafted

Kirby: Drafted

Lopez: Traded '17, Traded '23

Skubal: Drafted

Cease: Traded '17, Traded '24

Cole: Traded '19, FA '19

Glasnow: Traded '18, Traded '23

A Nola: Drafted/ FA (re-sign) '23

Burnes: Traded '24

Steele: Drafted

Castillo: Traded '16 (twice), Traded '17, Traded '22 (extended)

Monty: Traded '22, Traded '23, FA '24 (1 year deal)

S Lugo: FA '22, FA '23 (moderate deal)

 

6 out of 20 were acquired by trade in the last 1-2.5 years)

2 more were acquired by trade over 3 years ago

7 were acquired through Free Agency, some not at a high cost or long term.

6 were drafted

 

Not many traded for were "young," but some were not old, and some are very good pitchers.

 

8 by trade

7 by FA

5 by draft and holding on

 

I'd have traded Duran for Castillo and maybe Lopez. Cease? Maybe. Burnes? Not for 1 year. Glasnow? No.

 

Edited by moonslav59
Old-Timey Member
Posted
not a top of the rotation one. People have been saying that for years but teams are loathe to give up top young arms

 

And yet it seems to happen anyway.

 

Zac Gallen being a prime example. Also Tyler Glasgow, Dylan Cease, Cole Ragans, Joe Ryan, AJ Puk, Sandy Alcantara, etc..

Community Moderator
Posted
As much as I’d love to pencil Story in at 2nd next year can we really trust him?

 

I mean if Sale stays healthy all year maybe there is hope.

 

Pencil him at 2B with Grissom on the bench as backup. Could do worse.

Posted
And yet it seems to happen anyway.

 

Zac Gallen being a prime example. Also Tyler Glasgow, Dylan Cease, Cole Ragans, Joe Ryan, AJ Puk, Sandy Alcantara, etc..

 

how many of those have the Sox acquired?

Posted
Pencil him at 2B with Grissom on the bench as backup. Could do worse.

 

If he hits as advertised I would love to see Grissom in a super utility role, the kind where he's getting 400 AB's a year.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
how many of those have the Sox acquired?

 

You just said other teams don't trade them. I named several examples of pitchers they did trade. Naming one team that does not have one (unless you count Pivetta) doesn't disprove this.

 

But if you like, the Sox did trade for Pedro and Sale, which have been two of the best TOR arms in the last 30 years, and the Sox traded for them both...

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Pencil him at 2B with Grissom on the bench as backup. Could do worse.

 

Next year they also might start Story at SS and hold off on Mayer until Trevor gets injured...

Posted
how many of those have the Sox acquired?

 

That is the issue, not that no teams are offering them in trade.

 

We had several chances to make better offers, and we have a strong enough farm to propose top offers.

Posted
And yet it seems to happen anyway.

 

Zac Gallen being a prime example. Also Tyler Glasgow, Dylan Cease, Cole Ragans, Joe Ryan, AJ Puk, Sandy Alcantara, etc..

 

so seven guys......spread out over how many years? there's 30 teams in baseball looking for pitching.

 

Teams like to keep young pitching isn't analogous with teams keep all of their pitching.

Posted
That is the issue, not that no teams are offering them in trade.

 

We had several chances to make better offers, and we have a strong enough farm to propose top offers.

 

Think of me as John Henry so I can tell you that spending big--in dollars or prospects--on pitchers is stupid. Right now the Sox rotation--Bello, Pivetta, Crawford, Whitlock (on the IL, maybe for the season), Houck, and now Criswell--is the primary reason why the Sox team ERA, 2.95, is just a tad behind the Yankees 2.92 for the best team ERA in MLB.

 

And the Sox are paying those six starters a total of $15M this season, $1M less than Kenley Jansen, the closer who these days basically gets by with one pitch, a cutter. Last night he threw 11 pitches, including 10 cutters and 1 slider--and he got the save (with no runs scored), but the Rays hit the ball hard.

Posted

Since this thread is about Sale, I agree with the general belief that the Braves outsmarted us by giving up Grissom to get Sale, with the Sox paying Sale's $17M salary this year.

 

On the other hand, while I would love to see 2024 Chris Sale in the Sox rotation, I like the one we have. In fact, so far, after 49 games, they are probably the best Sox rotation in 50 years.

Community Moderator
Posted
If he hits as advertised I would love to see Grissom in a super utility role, the kind where he's getting 400 AB's a year.

 

Brock Holt had a few seasons with the Sox where he got 500, but I think 300-500 is reasonable for a really good UTIL guy.

Community Moderator
Posted
Next year they also might start Story at SS and hold off on Mayer until Trevor gets injured...

 

You trying to 4 year ARB Mayer?

Community Moderator
Posted
And yet it seems to happen anyway.

 

Zac Gallen being a prime example. Also Tyler Glasgow, Dylan Cease, Cole Ragans, Joe Ryan, AJ Puk, Sandy Alcantara, etc..

 

Beckett

Old-Timey Member
Posted
so seven guys......spread out over how many years? there's 30 teams in baseball looking for pitching.

 

Teams like to keep young pitching isn't analogous with teams keep all of their pitching.

 

First of all, it was seven off the top of my head. Was I supposed to name every young pitcher who was traded to disprove that no young pitchers get traded?

 

Second, there are two philosophies with young pitchers. Some teams E absolutely do like to keep them. But others don’t mind dealing them because they pan out at a much lower rate than position players. I only named pitchers who have panned out; the list of high profile pitching prospects that didn’t and got traded is much, much larger…

Posted
First of all, it was seven off the top of my head. Was I supposed to name every young pitcher who was traded to disprove that no young pitchers get traded?

 

Second, there are two philosophies with young pitchers. Some teams E absolutely do like to keep them. But others don’t mind dealing them because they pan out at a much lower rate than position players. I only named pitchers who have panned out; the list of high profile pitching prospects that didn’t and got traded is much, much larger…

 

Teams deal young pitching because they’re cheap small market teams and when said player is entering expensive arby years and the team is nowhere near competing, team cashes in for a haul of prospects.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Since this thread is about Sale, I agree with the general belief that the Braves outsmarted us by giving up Grissom to get Sale, with the Sox paying Sale's $17M salary this year.

 

On the other hand, while I would love to see 2024 Chris Sale in the Sox rotation, I like the one we have. In fact, so far, after 49 games, they are probably the best Sox rotation in 50 years.

 

46 years. That 1978 rotation with Eck, Tiant, Lee and Torrez was king. Not that s***** 1974 rotation with Tiant, Lee, Reggie DH

 

 

;)

Community Moderator
Posted
Teams deal young pitching because they’re cheap small market teams and when said player is entering expensive arby years and the team is nowhere near competing, team cashes in for a haul of prospects.

 

Trade an expensive player and wish on 3 lottery tickets. It doesn't always work out, but it may someday.

Community Moderator
Posted
46 years. That 1978 rotation with Eck, Tiant, Lee and Torrez was king. Not that s***** 1974 rotation with Tiant, Lee, Reggie DH

 

 

;)

 

Tell that to the Hamster that pulled Lee out of the rotation.

Posted (edited)

The best rotation ERA- since at least 1967:

 

64 BOS 2024 and PHI 2024 (in progress)

70 LAD 2022

71 CHC '16, CLE '20

72 LAD '21

73 ATL '98, LAD '19, CIN '20, ATL '97

 

SOX Best

2024 (64)

2002 (77) Pedro 2.26, Lowe 2.58, Wake 2.81, Burkett 4.53, Castillo 5.07, Fossum 3.46

1990 (81) Clemens 1.93, Boddicker 3.36, 3.38 Bolton, 3.97 Kiecker, 4.00 Harris

1999 (82) Pedro 2.07, Saberhagen 2.95, 4.12 Rapp, Rose 4.87, Portugal 5.51

1993 (84) Sele 2.74, 3.26 Darwin, 3.14 Viola, 4.46 Clemens, Dopson 4.97, Quantrill 3.91

2018 (85) Sale 2.11, Price 3.58, ERod 3.82, Nate 3.33, Porcello 4.28, Johnson 4.17

1986 (86) Clemens 2.48, Hurst 2.99, 3.78 Boyd, 3.80 Seaver, Nipper 5.38

1978 (87) Eckersley 2.99, Tiant 3.31, Lee 3.46, Wright 3.57, Torrez 3.96 (notin has a good point)

1992 (88)

2017, 1979, 2008 (89)

1973, 2000, 2007 (90)

2004, 1995 (91)

2013, 1998, 1994 (92)

 

I like the 2002 and 1986 rotations, a lot. To me, 2018 was the best.

 

The 2004 one was great, but Wake was at 4.87 that year, and Lowe was at 5.42.

 

Best fWAR rotations:

1990 (20.6)

2002 (19.9)

1999 (19.7)

2004 (18.2)

1992 (18.1)

2003 (17.7)

 

Edited by moonslav59
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Teams deal young pitching because they’re cheap small market teams and when said player is entering expensive arby years and the team is nowhere near competing, team cashes in for a haul of prospects.

 

Some teams just deal them to complete trades. Like how the Sox got Pivetta, Fitts, Winckowski, Sandlin and Judice…

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Tell that to the Hamster that pulled Lee out of the rotation.

 

I tried using my Ouija Board. No dice so far…

Posted
Some teams just deal them to complete trades. Like how the Sox got Pivetta, Fitts, Winckowski, Sandlin and Judice…

 

Within 8 years or so, we also got Sale, ERod, Nate, Kimbrell & Porcello by trade.

 

And, lessers like Kelly, Ottavino, Pom, Wright & Hembree.

Posted
Some teams just deal them to complete trades. Like how the Sox got Pivetta, Fitts, Winckowski, Sandlin and Judice…

 

And how many of those guys are TOTRS? 3 of them don’t even have MLB experience.

 

Teams are more willing to deal prospects than young, proven, cost controlled pitching e.g. white Sox Chris Sale.

 

It’s a lot easier to trade for the next Josh Winckowski than it is Spencer Strider.

Posted
And how many of those guys are TOTRS? 3 of them don’t even have MLB experience.

 

Teams are more willing to deal prospects than young, proven, cost controlled pitching e.g. white Sox Chris Sale.

 

It’s a lot easier to trade for the next Josh Winckowski than it is Spencer Strider.

 

How about Luis Castillo, Pablo Lopez, Dylan Cease and Burnes?

Posted
How about Luis Castillo, Pablo Lopez, Dylan Cease and Burnes?

 

Weren’t all those guys rentals?

 

Sure some of them signed extensions and that’s the right ideal if you trade for them and feel co didn’t you can do so.

 

But didn’t they all have .5-1 year or team control.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
And how many of those guys are TOTRS? 3 of them don’t even have MLB experience.

 

Teams are more willing to deal prospects than young, proven, cost controlled pitching e.g. white Sox Chris Sale.

 

It’s a lot easier to trade for the next Josh Winckowski than it is Spencer Strider.

 

You should see how easy it was to trade for Pablo Lopez. Not when Minnesota did it; when Miami did…

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...