Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
But we have the top UZR/150 in the AL.

 

I'm quickly losing faith in that stat.

 

I apologize for defending it so much in the past.

  • Replies 4.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Community Moderator
Posted
I'm quickly losing faith in that stat.

 

Is that stat just based on getting to balls and fielding them cleanly? Maybe the issue is the throwing to 1B? Maybe the issue is the type of contact the starters are giving up?

Community Moderator
Posted

Cora may not believe in UZR/150 either.

 

Renfroe is starting in CF today, but has a -89.2 UZR/150 in CF this season.

Posted
Is that stat just based on getting to balls and fielding them cleanly? Maybe the issue is the throwing to 1B? Maybe the issue is the type of contact the starters are giving up?

 

I thought it was supposed to be the most comprehensive of all defensive stats?

Community Moderator
Posted
I thought it was supposed to be the most comprehensive of all defensive stats?

 

Is it? I have no idea. Wouldn't that be dWAR?

Posted
Is that stat just based on getting to balls and fielding them cleanly? Maybe the issue is the throwing to 1B? Maybe the issue is the type of contact the starters are giving up?

 

We don't seem to be getting to as many balls as we should or as other teams seem to do vs us.

 

Our pitching suffers from the worst BAbip in the league, and it's not even close.

 

DRS has about in the middle.

 

Our D sucks. It's not even close.

Posted
I'm quickly losing faith in that stat.

 

I apologize for defending it so much in the past.

 

This team has one of the worst batted ball profiles of any contending team. Can't blame the defense for the pitching giving up lots of line drives and barrels.

Posted
I thought it was supposed to be the most comprehensive of all defensive stats?

 

It is. But it's not perfect. Defense is too hard to measure, and using uzr/150 instead of UZR compounds the issue, because UZR/150 is more predictive than cumulative in smaller samples.

Community Moderator
Posted
This team has one of the worst batted ball profiles of any contending team. Can't blame the defense for the pitching giving up lots of line drives and barrels.

 

That is my question too. It's not necessarily "defense bad."

Posted
It is. But it's not perfect. Defense is too hard to measure, and using uzr/150 instead of UZR compounds the issue, because UZR/150 is more predictive than cumulative in smaller samples.

 

Exactly.

 

And Fenway skews it a bit because the zone for left field can’t count those balls hit 25 feet up the monster where any play is impossible.

 

It is worth noting the Sox team defense is supported by great numbers in LF (2nd in MLB) which might mask some of the other positions, notably 3b (14th), SS (16th) and 1b (27th)…

Community Moderator
Posted

@ChrisCotillo

Matt Andriese's time with the Red Sox is done, as the club designated him for assignment. Josh Taylor activated from the COVID-19 IL.

Posted
Cora may not believe in UZR/150 either.

 

Renfroe is starting in CF today, but has a -89.2 UZR/150 in CF this season.

 

I think he’s lining them up for the stadium.

 

He has JD in the smaller RF and Verdugo covering the expansive LF…

Posted (edited)
This team has one of the worst batted ball profiles of any contending team. Can't blame the defense for the pitching giving up lots of line drives and barrels.

 

The thing is, it's not that.

 

We are 11th out of 15 AL teams in Hard Hit Ball Percentage at 31.0%- (really 4th best) -actually better than TRB and CHW.

 

It's interesting to point out that the top 7 AL playoff contenders have the best 7 hard hit% numbers:

 

29.7 OAK & HOU

30.3 NYY

30.4 TOR

31.0 BOS

31.2 CWS & TBR

31.4 LAA

31.5 SEA

(Even SEA and LAA are placed near the top in the standings, too!)

 

LD% shows us looking pretty bad, but the difference bwteen being 2nd last and middle of the road is just 0.6%.

 

Best

18.2 NYY

19.4 TOR

19.8 DET

20.4 CLE

20.5 SEA & HOU

20.7 TBR

20.8 CWS

20.9 MIN

21.1 KCR & OAK

21.2 TEX

21.5 BOS & LAA

21.9 BAL

 

The Sox are also 3rd best in Soft Hit % at 17.6% (behind only NYY & CWS)

 

We are 5th in HR/FB at 12.6%, 4th in GB% (43.5%)and 3rd in GB/FB at 1.25.

 

We are also 4th in K% (24.8%), so less balls are put in play than most teams, thank God!

 

Our K/BB rate is 6th (2.79)

 

 

 

Edited by moonslav59
Posted
The thing is, it's not that.

 

We are 11th out of 15 AL teams in Hard Hit Ball Percentage at 31.0%- (really 4th best) -actually better than TRB and CHW.

 

It's interesting to point out that the top 7 AL playoff contenders have the best 7 hard hit% numbers:

 

29.7 OAK & HOU

30.3 NYY

30.4 TOR

31.0 BOS

31.2 CWS & TBR

31.4 LAA

31.5 SEA

(Even SEA and LAA are placed near the top in the standings, too!)

 

LD% shows us looking pretty bad, but the difference bwteen being 2nd last and middle of the road is just 0.6%.

 

Best

18.2 NYY

19.4 TOR

19.8 DET

20.4 CLE

20.5 SEA & HOU

20.7 TBR

20.8 CWS

20.9 MIN

21.1 KCR & OAK

21.2 TEX

21.5 BOS & LAA

21.9 BAL

 

The Sox are also 3rd best in Soft Hit % at 17.6% (behind only NYY & CWS)

 

We are 5th in HR/FB at 12.6%, 4th in GB% (43.5%)and 3rd in GB/FB at 1.25.

 

We are also 4th in K% (24.8%), so less balls are put in play than most teams, thank God!

 

Our K/BB rate is 6th (2.79)

 

 

 

 

I am in court looking up some documents foe a divorce, but I will expand on this topic when I get back. The cumulative numbers are mediocre, and not necessarily a reflection of crappy defense. Also again, uzr/150 is beyond terrible in smaller samples.

 

I don't see how you can turn on UZR while supporting CERA honestly.

Posted
I am in court looking up some documents foe a divorce, but I will expand on this topic when I get back. The cumulative numbers are mediocre, and not necessarily a reflection of crappy defense. Also again, uzr/150 is beyond terrible in smaller samples.

 

I don't see how you can turn on UZR while supporting CERA honestly.

 

They are wildly different things. One isn't even a stat.

Posted
@ChrisCotillo

Matt Andriese's time with the Red Sox is done, as the club designated him for assignment. Josh Taylor activated from the COVID-19 IL.

 

Finalmente!

Community Moderator
Posted

@alexspeier

Since the beginning of July, No. 9 hitters are hitting .275/.338/.443 against Red Sox pitchers. League average No. 9 hitters (non-pitcher variety) are posting a .220/.293/.354 line.

 

Figuring out how to blame this on UZR.

Community Moderator
Posted
@ChrisCotillo

Matt Andriese's time with the Red Sox is done, as the club designated him for assignment. Josh Taylor activated from the COVID-19 IL.

 

So about Andriese...

Community Moderator
Posted

@IanCundall

Since Tanner Houck has moved into the rotation, here are his batters faced per start: 18 (7/22), 15 (7/28), 16 (8/7), 21 (8/12), 18 (8/17). Today, he got pulled at only 58 p. w/the top of the order coming up. Very clear the Red Sox don’t want hitters seeing him for a third time.

Posted
@IanCundall

Since Tanner Houck has moved into the rotation, here are his batters faced per start: 18 (7/22), 15 (7/28), 16 (8/7), 21 (8/12), 18 (8/17). Today, he got pulled at only 58 p. w/the top of the order coming up. Very clear the Red Sox don’t want hitters seeing him for a third time.

And that worked out great.
Posted
And that worked out great.

 

I can't blame Cora for doing his best to win the game. Houck has not done well the third time through the order. He went to Whitlock who made bad decisions by trying to be too fine. Waling the first hitter we a 2 run lead was clearly a mistake and led to the loss of the game. Taylor also tried to get the Yankees chase and then gave up a blooper. Our pitchers failed and I hope they learned from it. Robles scares me as he lacks command even though he has a strong arm. this loss is not on Cora.

 

Base running was poor in the game as well.

Posted
Cora can’t win with some fans no matter what he chooses.

 

Well, that's exactly right. It's always been that way. SPLINTER does not think Cora is a good manager at all, other than that players like him. But the amusing thing is, SPLINTER didn't think Francona or Farrell were good managers either. And yet those are the 3 guys who managed the team to their 4 rings in our lifetimes.

Community Moderator
Posted (edited)
Well, that's exactly right. It's always been that way. SPLINTER does not think Cora is a good manager at all, other than that players like him. But the amusing thing is, SPLINTER didn't think Francona or Farrell were good managers either. And yet those are the 3 guys who managed the team to their 4 rings in our lifetimes.

 

Well, please don't besmirch Tito by lumping him in with Farrell.

Edited by mvp 78
Posted
Well, that's exactly right. It's always been that way. SPLINTER does not think Cora is a good manager at all, other than that players like him. But the amusing thing is, SPLINTER didn't think Francona or Farrell were good managers either. And yet those are the 3 guys who managed the team to their 4 rings in our lifetimes.

 

Cora is a good manager IMO.

Posted
Well, please don't besmirch Tito by lumping him in with Francona.

 

I know you meant Farrell. I was just trying to be comprehensive. :cool:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...