Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
DD was hired as the President of Baseball Operations, not GM. Ben could have stayed on. Mike Hazen functioned as the GM under DD.

 

Ben would have been a wimp to stay on. He did the right thing.

  • Replies 12.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • moonslav59

    2423

  • Old Red

    1587

  • Bellhorn04

    1491

  • notin

    1442

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
So playoffs or bust? What's "the goal" for him to keep his job?

 

They wanted him to build a sustainable farm and a competitive roster that could be supplemented by it. The farm looks like it can be a top-notch unit from here on out, but the MLB roster needs work. He'll have money to burn and clear needs to address. If he can't get this team to at least the playoffs next year, he should be canned.

Posted
They wanted him to build a sustainable farm and a competitive roster that could be supplemented by it. The farm looks like it can be a top-notch unit from here on out, but the MLB roster needs work. He'll have money to burn and clear needs to address. If he can't get this team to at least the playoffs next year, he should be canned.

 

Even if they give him $20M to fill the 3 big slots needed to fill?

 

SP1

SP2

RH'd OF

Posted
If they do that he should quit.

 

Why?

 

He's getting paid enough and may end up seeing the benefits of his work starting in 2025, like Ben might have in 2018.

 

He's been playing the long game, as I suspect he was told to do, hired to do, and has been doing rather well, IMO.

Posted

If 2021 had been a .440 winning %, this would have been Bloom's progression:

 

.519 in 2019- before the purge

 

.400 in '20

.440 in '21

.480 in '22

.520 in '23

 

Perfect graph line!

 

Extend this guy for 4 YEARS!

 

We'll be at .640 by then.

Posted
Why?

 

He's getting paid enough and may end up seeing the benefits of his work starting in 2025, like Ben might have in 2018.

 

He's been playing the long game, as I suspect he was told to do, hired to do, and has been doing rather well, IMO.

 

It's all a matter of opinion.

Posted
One pitcher wouldn't have made enough of a difference this year.

 

Nope, but two of the many who were dealt in July would've meant a lot better shot at the postseason. It was the month that two team leaders (at least in salary) -- Jansen and Devers -- appealed for help for both the pen and rotation. According to Bloom, BOH and Sam K, that just didn't "make sense."

 

Instead, in the first series after the deadline -- vs. a team the Sox were just one game behind in the loss column for a wild card spot -- Cora was left to start two openers. Toronto -- using starters Manoah, Berrios and Bassitt -- swept Boston. The Jays didn't even have to use their #1, Kevin Gausman. For fans, it will be remembered as the most despicable series of the season.

 

The most ridiculous, of course, was being swept by Houston, when the Astros were another playoff-bound club Boston still had a chance to catch. The infamous Bear Claw Game will always be a reminder of what can happen when a front office regularly refuses to fortify the big league bullpen with legitimate MLB pitchers.

Posted
They wanted him to build a sustainable farm and a competitive roster that could be supplemented by it. The farm looks like it can be a top-notch unit from here on out, but the MLB roster needs work. He'll have money to burn and clear needs to address. If he can't get this team to at least the playoffs next year, he should be canned.

 

Agreed. He hasn't put it together for the MLB team yet. His drafts have been fine. His offseason maneuvers have left something to be desired.

Posted
Even if they give him $20M to fill the 3 big slots needed to fill?

 

SP1

SP2

RH'd OF

 

Wouldn't they have Duvall's contract, Turner's contract, Kluber's contract, Kiké's contract and remaining cap space (assuming Devers uses Barnes/Bleier/Brasier/Tapia contract amounts)? That's closer to 35M to spend.

Posted
Did you know the Sox are 56-3 when leading after 6 innings? f*** Nola!! Sign Hader and Dylan Floro!

 

That's an interesting stat (56-3, after 6 when leading) given that Jansen himself has lost 5 games . That means the Sox trailed after 6 at least 2 times, tied or regained the lead, then Kenley blew it. There must be a few others on the staff who did the same.

 

Anyway, the eye test indicates that the Sox tend to hit better late in the game , often quiet early.

Posted
If 2021 had been a .440 winning %, this would have been Bloom's progression:

 

.519 in 2019- before the purge

 

.400 in '20

.440 in '21

.480 in '22

.520 in '23

 

Perfect graph line!

 

Extend this guy for 4 YEARS!

 

We'll be at .640 by then.

 

If you change one number it makes a perfect progression? Uh..........

 

.417 in '20

.546 in '21

.469 in '22

.444 in '23

 

Maybe that's the progression Bloom is going for?

Posted
If you change one number it makes a perfect progression? Uh..........

 

.417 in '20

.546 in '21

.469 in '22

.444 in '23

 

Maybe that's the progression Bloom is going for?

 

You changed 4.

 

My point was meant to show that other than 2021, the winning % has been on a steady upward slope.

 

Posted
You changed 4.

 

My point was meant to show that other than 2021, the winning % has been on a steady upward slope.

 

 

Other than 2019, Dombrowski's teams were on a rocket ride to interstellar space.

Posted
Other than 2019, Dombrowski's teams were on a rocket ride to interstellar space.

 

Indeed. Had the spending kept rising, too, he might still be here.

Posted
Indeed. Had the spending kept rising, too, he might still be here.

 

Your taste for hypothetical histories far exceeds mine. I find making sense of what's actually happened hard enough.

Posted
You changed 4.

 

My point was meant to show that other than 2021, the winning % has been on a steady upward slope.

 

 

I used actual winning % for 20, 21 and 22 and then project the remainder of 2023. You rounded down for 2020, made up a number for 2021 and rounded up for 2022. Why?

Posted
Your taste for hypothetical histories far exceeds mine. I find making sense of what's actually happened hard enough.

 

IMO, DD's friction with the top brass seemed to be over the change in spending and trading away prospects philosophies.

 

Had we brought back Kimbrell and traded Casas or Bello back in 2019, we might have kept the winning going another year or two. Okay, I just added another hypothetical... YIKES!

Posted
Dombrowski left a legacy of three straight division titles and one championship , featuring one of the best teams in MLB history. Also a not so decimated farm with prospects like Bello, Casas, Duran, Crawford, Houck and Rafaela.
Posted
Dombrowski left a legacy of three straight division titles and one championship , featuring one of the best teams in MLB history. Also a not so decimated farm with prospects like Bello, Casas, Duran, Crawford, Houck and Rafaela.

 

Indeed. His legacy is a great one.

 

Almost all the prospects he traded away underperformed expectation.

 

Only a small few of the players he traded for underperformed.

 

He was not the one that put the brakes on spending and trading prospects, so he should not be "blamed" for 2019.

 

Posted
IMO, DD's friction with the top brass seemed to be over the change in spending and trading away prospects philosophies.

 

It's a reasonable guess, but that's all it is. There was the rumor about "lack of communication", but a cynic might think that was a cover story.

 

As has been pointed out many times, he seemed to do what he was hired to do.

Posted
IMO, DD's friction with the top brass seemed to be over the change in spending and trading away prospects philosophies.

 

Had we brought back Kimbrell and traded Casas or Bello back in 2019, we might have kept the winning going another year or two. Okay, I just added another hypothetical... YIKES!

 

Bello was the 17th ranked prospect when DD was fired. Not sure what that brings back.

Posted
It's a reasonable guess, but that's all it is. There was the rumor about "lack of communication", but a cynic might think that was a cover story.

 

As has been pointed out many times, he seemed to do what he was hired to do.

 

When people agree, not much communication is needed.

Posted
Dombrowski left a legacy of three straight division titles and one championship , featuring one of the best teams in MLB history. Also a not so decimated farm with prospects like Bello, Casas, Duran, Crawford, Houck and Rafaela.

 

Also he was one of the best horse traders in baseball. He could make a deal, the right deal. Do people who want to see Bloom deal anyone away, really think he can make the types of deal that Dombrowski did? Oh, by the way, the farm does have more players in it then when he was here. Does that alone mean that he decimated the farm? Not by a long shot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...