Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted
There are issues with being able to construct and maintain a minor league program capable of feeding the major league team with a few good players each year. The main issue that I see is the draft choices successful teams acquire are later selections. That means the selectors must be wise and the development team must be first class. It also means that clubs avoid trading away top prospects without getting great value in return. Finally, it should be a goal to avoid further penalties associated with the competitive balance tax. It comes down to having a high quality management.

 

Luck also plays a part. Sore arms, illnesses and bouncing balls can change the fortune of a team, but a sound approach should provide the best result overall. Forgive my use of bolded print as it is easier for me to read these days.

 

Well said Oldtimer. You bring up a good point that I think sometimes gets overlooked, that it's not just the drafting, but it's also the development. Emotional and mental development along with physical development. And yes, luck plays a big part in whether prospects pan out or not.

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I also believe Pedey's contract was unwise, although he was well loved by the fans. When sentimentality gets involved, better opportunities are lost. A club can't be as successful when management tosses away budget room on a bad bet.

 

I liked Pedroia's contract at the time it was signed. But here is just another example in the long line of examples of long contracts that end up hurting the team. Sure, the Sox can and are absorbing that money. But wouldn't it be nice to have the extra resource?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
How about what's to come next? How many position players from the '18 champs will still be Red Sox in '21? I'd say only Devers and Bogaerts are sure bets...

 

Cliff? Did somebody say cliff?

 

{Ducks}

Posted
Cliff? Did somebody say cliff?

 

{Ducks}

 

If Bloom turns out to be a really good one, as I'm hopeful he will (and I know you are too), John Henry and the franchise will be golden again.

Posted
If Bloom turns out to be a really good one, as I'm hopeful he will (and I know you are too), John Henry and the franchise will be golden again.

 

Exactly...

 

Right after the cliff of 2019-2020 (hopefully not 2021).

Verified Member
Posted (edited)

Holy Crap!! I'm watching them LIVE! It's a miracle.

 

(But the 'no-spitting' policy clearly isn't being enforced.

Edited by jad
Posted
Exactly...

 

Right after the cliff of 2019-2020 (hopefully not 2021).

 

And 2019 wasn't a cliff, just a year where everything went wrong.

Posted
And 2019 wasn't a cliff, just a year where everything went wrong.

 

On paper, we had one of the best starting rotations.

Posted
On paper, we had one of the best starting rotations.

 

One of the best lineups, too. We were given a good chance to repeat.

Community Moderator
Posted
And 2019 wasn't a cliff, just a year where everything went wrong.

 

Gotta keep that narrative going somehow!

Old-Timey Member
Posted
If Bloom turns out to be a really good one, as I'm hopeful he will (and I know you are too), John Henry and the franchise will be golden again.

 

I am hopeful. Excited, actually.

Community Moderator
Posted
Braiser sucks. Workman sucks. The bullpen sucks.

 

Workman was a 2 fWAR guy last year out of the bullpen. That's how good he was. Maybe he'll never be that good again, but it's hard to say he "sucks."

Posted
Workman was a 2 fWAR guy last year out of the bullpen. That's how good he was. Maybe he'll never be that good again, but it's hard to say he "sucks."

 

I meant Barnes and I edited the post. LOL

Posted
Brasier is a semi-pro, independent league type. He got in a good groove for 1 season and the Red Sox benefited from it. As I said earlier, he's well past his expiration date. Workman had his career season last year and I would not expect a repeat. Barnes has been deteriorating for a while. The whole staff looks like a horror show --3 legitimate MLB starters and potluck followed up by a parade of pigs from the pen.
Old-Timey Member
Posted

Roenicke really likes the idea of JD in the #2 hole. He's been paying attention. :)

 

Hopefully, he won't bat Devers 3rd.

Posted
Roenicke really likes the idea of JD in the #2 hole. He's been paying attention. :)

 

Hopefully, he won't bat Devers 3rd.

 

Isn't the idea he espoused was to break up the two lefties hitting back to back but inserting JD in between? If so, he is thinking of Devers 3rd. Don't worry, if it doesn't work Roenicke will make a change. If we are not in a competitive position after 30 games, I would hope the Sox make changes like experimenting with younger talent and offloading guys who have underperformed. JBJ comes to mind and some of our pitching staff.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Isn't the idea he espoused was to break up the two lefties hitting back to back but inserting JD in between? If so, he is thinking of Devers 3rd. Don't worry, if it doesn't work Roenicke will make a change. If we are not in a competitive position after 30 games, I would hope the Sox make changes like experimenting with younger talent and offloading guys who have underperformed. JBJ comes to mind and some of our pitching staff.

 

Yes, that is exactly what Roenicke is thinking, which is a big reason why he put JD 2nd. I'm okay with that. I would prefer Devers and JD in the 2nd and 4th spots, in either order, but I'm okay with what he's going with. As you said, there will likely be changes in the lineup throughout the short season.

Posted
Yes, that is exactly what Roenicke is thinking, which is a big reason why he put JD 2nd. I'm okay with that. I would prefer Devers and JD in the 2nd and 4th spots, in either order, but I'm okay with what he's going with. As you said, there will likely be changes in the lineup throughout the short season.

 

The only other candidate for 2nd in the order is Bogey. Not such a bad choice either.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
The only other candidate for 2nd in the order is Bogey. Not such a bad choice either.

 

We hope to have a good enough line up that it doesn't matter who bats where in the top 5. (Not that it matters a whole lot to begin with.)

Posted
Cliff? Did somebody say cliff?

 

{Ducks}

 

It is worse than a cliff. The golden years are over. It was sweet while it lasted. Time to get comfortable with consistent mediocrity.

Community Moderator
Posted
It is worse than a cliff. The golden years are over. It was sweet while it lasted. Time to get comfortable with consistent mediocrity.

 

Yup. 108 wins two years ago. Mediocre last year so we’ll always be mediocre going forward. Good analysis.

Posted
ERod is out again. By time he gets back to full strength, the race will be over for the Red Sox. Although if 16 teams will make the playoffs, teams with under .500 records will be in the hunt.
Posted
And 2019 wasn't a cliff, just a year where everything went wrong.

 

It shouldn't have been a cliff, but man, it felt like one.

Posted
And 2019 wasn't a cliff, just a year where everything went wrong.
The Cliff was Cora's ill-conceived Spring Training preparation for the pitching staff.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
It shouldn't have been a cliff, but man, it felt like one.

 

It felt like they could just never get going...

Community Moderator
Posted
It shouldn't have been a cliff, but man, it felt like one.

 

3rd place in the division and above .500. What a cliff!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...