Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Darwinzon

Seabold

German

 

Some were traded for other guys. I don't remember if DHern was.

 

There were others too, wasn't there that SS who they literally just added to the 40 man a week earlier, traded for actually, only to remove him shortly after the rule 5.

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I suppose you could argue that in hindsight, but the fact that he was taken #1 overall tells you had had trade value, and the Sox let him slip away for nothing. So yes, it was a mistake.

 

I think it was a mistake, too, but the final grade is still pending.

 

He could still end up back with us, although that is doubtful, but how would it be viewed, if that happened?

Posted
There were others too, wasn't there that SS who they literally just added to the 40 man a week earlier, traded for actually, only to remove him shortly after the rule 5.

 

Yes, they traded Lobo for Park, then DFA'd him.

Posted
They don't grow on trees, but it seems like there are more and more of them these days.

 

Well, you know how relief pitching goes. Some guys can never put it together, and others tweak a thing or two and become shutdown relief pitchers. Another teams trash becomes another teams treasure, it's not un justified carrying Ort until now BUT there's a very strong argument that it may be time to move on now.

Posted
Yes, they traded Lobo for Park, then DFA'd him.

 

A lot of teams traded for Hoy Park this off-season and then DFAd him. Teams liked his glove and OBP skills, but not enough to dedicate a 40 man roster spot.

 

That type of thing happens to a few players every offseason…

Posted
Yes, they traded Lobo for Park, then DFA'd him.

 

I forget how long it was, but it felt like he was on the 40 man for only two weeks, I'm sure maybe it was longer but I know it was brief. I think the Rule 5 was mismanaged, leaving Ward unprotected was an obvious mistake. Politi and Song there's nothing you really could have done, but Ward shouldn't have been exposed.

Posted
I think it was a mistake, too, but the final grade is still pending.

 

He could still end up back with us, although that is doubtful, but how would it be viewed, if that happened?

 

The difference in final grade is between an F and an F+

Posted
Well, you know how relief pitching goes. Some guys can never put it together, and others tweak a thing or two and become shutdown relief pitchers. Another teams trash becomes another teams treasure, it's not un justified carrying Ort until now BUT there's a very strong argument that it may be time to move on now.

 

It’s always been unjustified carrying Ort until now. And while people say that it makes not protecting Ward look worse, is there a single person on this board who thnks keeping Ort has ever been the right baseball move?

Posted
Well I don't think we should assume if we DFA'd Ort back then that today we'd be DFAing Ward. I feel that may be a false premise, besides the fact that he was picked up with the #1 pick should tell us that if anything we would be trading him not DFAing him.

 

 

It’s not so much a false premise as it is a strong possibility.

 

If not Ward, then who?

Community Moderator
Posted
There were others too, wasn't there that SS who they literally just added to the 40 man a week earlier, traded for actually, only to remove him shortly after the rule 5.

 

Park was brought in AFTER the Rule 5 date so he doesn't count. His transactions had no impact on whether they kept Ward or not.

Community Moderator
Posted
I forget how long it was, but it felt like he was on the 40 man for only two weeks, I'm sure maybe it was longer but I know it was brief. I think the Rule 5 was mismanaged, leaving Ward unprotected was an obvious mistake. Politi and Song there's nothing you really could have done, but Ward shouldn't have been exposed.

 

I agree. If Chris Murphy was taken in the draft, I'm not sure we'd be still talking about it.

Posted
It’s always been unjustified carrying Ort until now. And while people say that it makes not protecting Ward look worse, is there a single person on this board who thnks keeping Ort has ever been the right baseball move?

 

I think that's 100% a hindsight opinion, because people who fit Orts description become really good players. Not all the time, and often they do not, and sometimes become something in-between. Look at a guy like Andrew Miller who looked like garbage until his 6th or 7th year in the majors. If we were talking about age 21-25 Andrew Miller on our 40 man right now what would the narrative be in here? On paper, he would be looking worse than Ort is right now.

 

Just because it might be the right decision to DFA order today, doesn't mean we can go back retroactively and say he never should have been protected. At one point he showed more promise than he is today.

 

And he still might become a big leaguer one day, I just don't think it's going to be in Boston.

Posted
Park was brought in AFTER the Rule 5 date so he doesn't count. His transactions had no impact on whether they kept Ward or not.

 

No he wasn't, he was traded for in November, and the Rule 5 draft was in December.

Community Moderator
Posted
I think that's 100% a hindsight opinion, because people who fit Orts description become really good players. Not all the time, and often they do not, and sometimes become something in-between. Look at a guy like Andrew Miller who looked like garbage until his 6th or 7th year in the majors. If we were talking about age 21-25 Andrew Miller on our 40 man right now what would the narrative be in here? On paper, he would be looking worse than Ort is right now.

 

Just because it might be the right decision to DFA order today, doesn't mean we can go back retroactively and say he never should have been protected. At one point he showed more promise than he is today.

 

And he still might become a big leaguer one day, I just don't think it's going to be in Boston.

 

Kaleb Ort is 31!

Posted
I agree. If Chris Murphy was taken in the draft, I'm not sure we'd be still talking about it.

 

… Which is odd because Murphy is 16 months younger and actually been pitching. Why would we lament the 26 year old minor leaguer whose only thrown 71 IP total in the last 3 years? At some point, the best ability is availability…

Posted
No he wasn't, he was traded for in November, and the Rule 5 draft was in December.

 

The Rule 5 draft was December 7 and Park was DFAd December 13 and subsequently traded to Atlanta.

Community Moderator
Posted
No he wasn't, he was traded for in November, and the Rule 5 draft was in December.

 

Maybe you need a refresher on the rules?

 

In order to protect eligible minor league players from the draft, teams must add those prospects to their 40-man roster by 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, Nov. 15.

 

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2022/11/red-sox-acquire-hoy-park.html

 

Hoy Park was acquired on 11/23. It didn't impact Ward's Rule 5 pick at all.

Community Moderator
Posted
The Rule 5 draft was December 7 and Park was DFAd December 13 and subsequently traded to Atlanta.

 

That doesn't matter either.

Posted (edited)
That doesn't matter either.

 

Those are the dates. Don’t blame me. Park was acquired 11/23 as well.

 

Either way, not many are happy with the whole Ort/Ward thing, but Ort has done absolutely nothing to justify it, and simply keeping him on the roster and hoping that happens is even more foolish.

 

At this point, it’s not even Ward. I’d much rather have held onto to German over both Ort and Ward…

Edited by notin
Posted
Those are the dates. Don’t blame me. Park was acquired 11/23 as well.

 

Either way, not many are hardly with the whole Ort/Ward thing, but Ort has done absolutely nothing to justify it, and simply keeping him on the roster and hoping that happens is even more foolish.

 

At this point, it’s not even Ward. I’d much rather have held onto to German over both Ort and Ward…

 

Maybe even Wallace.

Community Moderator
Posted
Those are the dates. Don’t blame me. Park was acquired 11/23 as well.

 

Either way, not many are hardly with the whole Ort/Ward thing, but Ort has done absolutely nothing to justify it, and simply keeping him on the roster and hoping that happens is even more foolish.

 

At this point, it’s not even Ward. I’d much rather have held onto to German over both Ort and Ward…

 

The Park transaction has NOTHING to do with the Rule 5 draft.

Posted
Maybe even Wallace.

 

I don’t get the Wallace/Mills trade.

 

But part of that was me clearly valuing Wallace more than Bloom did, and also me knowing absolutely nothing about Mills. I still really don’t…

Posted
The Park transaction has NOTHING to do with the Rule 5 draft.

 

I only named dates.

 

Although I’d probably have kept Park over Ort, too, if I had that option…

Posted
I don’t get the Wallace/Mills trade.

 

But part of that was me clearly valuing Wallace more than Bloom did, and also me knowing absolutely nothing about Mills. I still really don’t…

 

It also further crunched the 40.

Community Moderator
Posted
I don’t get the Wallace/Mills trade.

 

But part of that was me clearly valuing Wallace more than Bloom did, and also me knowing absolutely nothing about Mills. I still really don’t…

 

They like his spin rate and arm slot. Believe he can be a Schreiber-type if given the time. He looked ok in ST? IDK.

Posted
They like his spin rate and arm slot. Believe he can be a Schreiber-type if given the time. He looked ok in ST? IDK.

 

I did criticize the deal, but only half-ass since Mills was a former Tampa farmhand and figured Bloom knew something…

Posted
It’s always been unjustified carrying Ort until now. And while people say that it makes not protecting Ward look worse, is there a single person on this board who thnks keeping Ort has ever been the right baseball move?

 

I'd make a retort of sort, but since this is sport, I'll be short.

Posted
I forget how long it was, but it felt like he was on the 40 man for only two weeks, I'm sure maybe it was longer but I know it was brief. I think the Rule 5 was mismanaged, leaving Ward unprotected was an obvious mistake. Politi and Song there's nothing you really could have done, but Ward shouldn't have been exposed.

 

The worst part is that old Sox fans won't get to see Ward scold Wally.

Community Moderator
Posted
I did criticize the deal, but only half-ass since Mills was a former Tampa farmhand and figured Bloom knew something…

 

He's a bottom of the 40 man roster guy to me. If he works out, fine. Maybe he's DFA'd at some point?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...