Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Pitch counts aren't necessarily the big factor.

 

True, but 60 is awfully low.

 

This season: 72, 79, 82, 92, 60

 

Maybe the 92 made Cora think he'd go light, this time, but it's not like 92 is way too much.

 

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Community Moderator
Posted
True, but 60 is awfully low.

 

This season: 72, 79, 82, 92, 60

 

Maybe the 92 made Cora think he'd go light, this time, but it's not like 92 is way too much.

 

 

My argument is in the reply I posted to Jackson. It was a game situation call. Cora didn't want Wacha to face Ohtani there. Cora was treating this as a virtual must-win.

Community Moderator
Posted
You have to look at the specifics of the game, too.

 

Sox ahead 2-0. Wacha is left in to face Ward and Trout for the third time each. Trout gets on and Ohtani is up with a chance to tie the game. Cora goes to the lefty.

 

Seems like the time to make the move?

Community Moderator
Posted
My argument is in the reply I posted to Jackson. It was a game situation call. Cora didn't want Wacha to face Ohtani there. Cora was treating this as a virtual must-win.

 

And Diekman did his job. Brasier came in and looked great. Sox then scored more runs so they could bring Low Leverage Sawamura in.

Community Moderator
Posted
And Diekman did his job. Brasier came in and looked great. Sox then scored more runs so they could bring Low Leverage Sawamura in.

 

Yep. Logical stuff all the way.

Posted
My argument is in the reply I posted to Jackson. It was a game situation call. Cora didn't want Wacha to face Ohtani there. Cora was treating this as a virtual must-win.

 

I get it. Cora understands all the ins and outs better than I do.

 

That being said, I'd like to see our starters going a bit longer into games, and with ST'ing being delayed and shortened, I can understand why there has been a delay. The expanded pens are now gone, so that's another reason we have seen shorter starts.

Posted
You have to look at the specifics of the game, too.

 

Sox ahead 2-0. Wacha is left in to face Ward and Trout for the third time each. Trout gets on and Ohtani is up with a chance to tie the game. Cora goes to the lefty.

 

More strain on an already over performing pen.

Community Moderator
Posted
More strain on an already over performing pen.

 

They only have 4 more innings than league average.

Posted
More strain on an already over performing pen.

 

What pen arm has been over-used, so far?

 

Maybe Whitlock? Maybe not.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
What pen arm has been over-used, so far?

 

Maybe Whitlock? Maybe not.

 

It might not be a problem this early in the season, but to keep up this early season pace all season long will most likely be one later in the season.

Verified Member
Posted
What pen arm has been over-used, so far?

 

Maybe Whitlock? Maybe not.

 

Wacha 26 IP 4 ER .095 WHIP .257 AVG

Whitlock 16.2 IP 1 ER .078 WHIP .218 AVG

 

Let's quit babying him. I think they are ready to stretch him and that's my prediction. Not sure if he's been 'overworked'.

 

Last night, Eck was laughing when Wacha got pulled with his 60 or so pitch count. I know what he thinks of current state of pitcher management. I agree with him.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Wacha 26 IP 4 ER .095 WHIP .257 AVG

Whitlock 16.2 IP 1 ER .078 WHIP .218 AVG

 

Let's quit babying him. I think they are ready to stretch him and that's my prediction. Not sure if he's been 'overworked'.

 

Last night, Eck was laughing when Wacha got pulled with his 60 or so pitch count. I know what he thinks of current state of pitcher management. I agree with him.

That’s today’s game of baseball, which to me is over managing.

Community Moderator
Posted
Wacha 26 IP 4 ER .095 WHIP .257 AVG

Whitlock 16.2 IP 1 ER .078 WHIP .218 AVG

 

Let's quit babying him. I think they are ready to stretch him and that's my prediction. Not sure if he's been 'overworked'.

 

Last night, Eck was laughing when Wacha got pulled with his 60 or so pitch count. I know what he thinks of current state of pitcher management. I agree with him.

 

And if Ohtani homered off Wacha to tie it, with Diekman ready, I'm sure they would been yucking it up too.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
It's kind of weird when you win 4-0 and people are still second-guessing the pitching moves.

 

I don’t think it’s weird at all, and as a matter of fact it’s pretty common place when a starting pitcher gets taken out when his pitch count is low, and is pitching a good game, which like I said what the modern day of baseball has become.

Posted
Wacha 26 IP 4 ER .095 WHIP .257 AVG

Whitlock 16.2 IP 1 ER .078 WHIP .218 AVG

 

Let's quit babying him. I think they are ready to stretch him and that's my prediction. Not sure if he's been 'overworked'.

 

Last night, Eck was laughing when Wacha got pulled with his 60 or so pitch count. I know what he thinks of current state of pitcher management. I agree with him.

 

I think babying our starters stops, real soon. Pens were reduced on May 2nd, and starters should be all caught up from the delayed and shortened ST'ings.

 

It's good to see all of our starters seemingly finding their groove, at just the right time. It does look like we will stick with 13 RP'ers after the 14 man pen extension is ended. 8 RP'ers shuld be enough, when we have Whitlock able to go 2-5 IP, and some others able to go 2 IP.

 

Here are the numbers on our rotation turn-around:

 

Wacha has been great all year, but even he has improved:

1.88 first 3

0.77 last 2

 

Eovaldi

4.50 first 2

1.45 last 3

 

Hill

7.00 first 2

0.00 last 2

 

Pivetta

10.03 first 3

5.00 last 2

Old-Timey Member
Posted
It's not about "babying". Analytics and game planning are the culprit for the quick hooks, if you want one.

 

And not for the better of the game in my opinion.

Posted
It's not about "babying". Analytics and game planning are the culprit for the quick hooks, if you want one.

 

I do think the delayed & shortened ST'ing and 15 man pens have contributed to less IP'd by starters, too.

 

"Babying" is probably not the right word to use, but I do think we will start seeing our starters go longer into games, especially when we are force to go from 14 to 13 pen arms.

Community Moderator
Posted
I do think the delayed & shortened ST'ing and 15 man pens have contributed to less IP'd by starters, too.

 

"Babying" is probably not the right word to use, but I do think we will start seeing our starters go longer into games, especially when we are force to go from 14 to 13 pen arms.

 

They've got guys they can shuttle to help out with the reduced pen number.

Posted
They've got guys they can shuttle to help out with the reduced pen number.

 

True, but do you really think we will remain at 76 pitches per start and 4.72 IP per start?

 

Of course, a lot depends on how well our starters do going forward, but assuming they continue doing well, I'm guessing we'll see longer starts by just about all our starters... not 8-9 IP, but more times into the 6th and 7th innings.

Community Moderator
Posted
It's kind of weird when you win 4-0 and people are still second-guessing the pitching moves.

 

The problem is that there was a period of time where pitch counts were the big thing and you would monitor how close a guy got to 100 pitches. That was the focus every game. Guy is at 85 pitches, maybe he gets taken out after the inning, maybe he faces a few more batters. Now, it's times through the order. It's just another way of looking at effectiveness.

Community Moderator
Posted
It's not about "babying". Analytics and game planning are the culprit for the quick hooks, if you want one.

 

^^^

Community Moderator
Posted
And not for the better of the game in my opinion.

 

They pulled Wacha after 60 pitches and the game was still over in 2.5 hours. I don't see how anyone could complain about how that game went.

Community Moderator
Posted
They've got guys they can shuttle to help out with the reduced pen number.

 

It's just about stocking up on guys that can go more than one inning at a time. Also, by getting rid of the LOOGY guys and one batter stints, it spreads the innings out more equitably among relief staffs.

Community Moderator
Posted
True, but do you really think we will remain at 76 pitches per start and 4.72 IP per start?

 

Of course, a lot depends on how well our starters do going forward, but assuming they continue doing well, I'm guessing we'll see longer starts by just about all our starters... not 8-9 IP, but more times into the 6th and 7th innings.

 

I do.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
They pulled Wacha after 60 pitches and the game was still over in 2.5 hours. I don't see how anyone could complain about how that game went.

 

Because to me it’s the analytics that controls the game to much, and I will always complain win, or lose, or not watch.

Posted
The problem is that there was a period of time where pitch counts were the big thing and you would monitor how close a guy got to 100 pitches. That was the focus every game. Guy is at 85 pitches, maybe he gets taken out after the inning, maybe he faces a few more batters. Now, it's times through the order. It's just another way of looking at effectiveness.

 

Wacha's history does not warrant strict 3rd time through the order watching.

Community Moderator
Posted
Because to me it’s the analytics that controls the game to much, and I will always complain win, or lose, or not watch.

 

It didn't slow up the game at all. It would have had no measurable impact on the game if the announcers didn't guffaw over it.

Community Moderator
Posted
Wacha's history does not warrant strict 3rd time through the order watching.

 

His FIP has been over 5 the previous 2 seasons. He's pitching great now and being pulled early. Seems like it's working so it must be necessary.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...