Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Answer to corruption in college basketball according to talking heads is to pay the athletes.

 

Are they really THAT DUMB?

 

If you pay the 'students-athletes' living wages, no one thinks that someone out there won't offer MORE money to entice a player to come?

 

And what are they really saying? Obviously they think college education has NO VALUE to them. These morons don't realize how expensive it is to attend Duke, just as an example?

 

What about title IX issues and non revenue sports? No one thinks that someone will challenge the policy of only football and basketball players getting 'paid'?

 

Start a minor league system or better yet, make high school seniors eligible for the draft.

 

Many of the reported cases were for minor infractions like parents being invited to lunch by an agent and no school involvement. Why throw them into the same category as where a coach discusses paying big money to an athlete to get them to attend their school. Clearly there are corrupting influences and they infect some of the football and basketball programs. You mention Duke for instance and they have a clean program as far as I know but the ESPN talking heads live by formenting controversy instead of reporting the true situation. Something great about young kids going out and playing their hearts out. I don't have the same feeling about the NBA players or games.

  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Any trade that we make should consider what we do if Bogeyor Devers happen to be injured. Some of our options are Nunez, Marrero and Lin. We need to keep at least one utility player who can play solid defense at those positions. Marrero and Lin can do that, Nunez can but is not as capable defensively.

 

Probably Nunez would be the guy. His good offense would hopefully outweigh the poor defense. Marrero & Lin could be defensive replacements.

Posted
By signing Nunez, you filled an opening day hole. What you also did is potentially fill any IF hole in the meantime. Flexibility will be key. If Pedroia cannot come back or comes back a shell of himself, you have his replacement. Should Bogey go down, Nunez can slot in for a bit at SS. Should Devers go down, Nunez can head there. Should Moreland go down, Devers can slide over and Nunez can take 3b. This is akin to what the Yanks did with Drury. You can create a super-team, but if your depth is thin, you're an injury away from being bad
Posted
By signing Nunez, you filled an opening day hole. What you also did is potentially fill any IF hole in the meantime. Flexibility will be key. If Pedroia cannot come back or comes back a shell of himself, you have his replacement. Should Bogey go down, Nunez can slot in for a bit at SS. Should Devers go down, Nunez can head there. Should Moreland go down, Devers can slide over and Nunez can take 3b. This is akin to what the Yanks did with Drury. You can create a super-team, but if your depth is thin, you're an injury away from being bad

 

Perhaps the best defensive position Nunez plays is LF, and with no OF depth, except the "fragile" JDM, maybe Nunez sees more action in the OF than IF once Pedey returns. I'm not even talking out of injury. We could see JBJ slumping or Beni struggling vs lefties by June, and maybe Nunez plays the OF. (This assumes Pedey comes back FT at 2B.

Posted

Cora wants Travis to learn the OF:

 

http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/red_sox/2018/03/red_sox_notebook_sam_travis_shows_off_power

 

 

A talk with Beeks:

 

http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/redsox/2018/03/04/jalen-beeks-has-built-himself-future-big-leagues/0CYiIvjWKqLLG4ntQsi1II/story.html

 

 

Word on Buttrey's chang-up:

 

http://www.masslive.com/redsox/index.ssf/2018/03/ty_buttrey_boston_red_sox_pros_2.html

 

 

A talk with Tanner Houck:

 

http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/red_sox/2018/03/red_sox_prospect_tanner_houck_aims_to_force_his_way_through_pipeline

 

 

Notes from soxprospects.com:

 

Blake Swihart has caught and played first base so far this spring, and getting playing time in the outfield seems like a good possibility for the soon-to-be 26-year-old. With his talent and the way he is hitting this spring he has earned a spot on a major league roster, and if that team is the Red Sox he will need to play multiple positions with Christian Vazquez and Sandy Leon on the roster.

 

With Steven Wright and Eduardo Rodriguez unlikely to be healthy enough for Opening Day and Drew Pomeranz now dealing with a mild flexor strain in his left forearm, Brian Johnson is the top in-house candidate to open the season as the fifth starter. Johnson has allowed two hits and struck out two without allowing a walk in his four innings this spring, including two scoreless innings against the Yankees on Saturday.

 

Positional versatility is clearly a desirable trait for Alex Cora, and he has mentioned Marwin Gonzalez a few times this spring as he stresses the importance of a player being able to field multiple positions. Cora coached Gonzalez on the Astros last season, and Gonzalez played every outfield position and every infield position except for catcher, all while hitting .303. In addition to Travis, Cora has played Esteban Quiroz in the outfield this spring even though he was exclusively an infielder over the last two years.

Posted
Wright had the same procedure are Pedroia and he isn't ready for prime time. Just an FYI. If Pom misses time, then the sox roll out of camp with Sale, Price, Porcello, Johnson, ??. The way the sox schedule is set up, you will need a 5th starter on April 2nd then not again until April 14th. Maybe Velazquez makes that April 2nd start and the sox hold Pom back until April 12th. That pushes Johnson back to the 14th. The schedule is really whacky. You will need a 4th and 5th starter first time through, but with the off days built in for the sox return to Fenway, you can run 3 starters out there for a turn before you have to use your 4 and 5 again. Gives the sox time to baby Pomeranz and an outside chance that ERod is ready by then
Posted
Wright had the same procedure are Pedroia and he isn't ready for prime time. Just an FYI. If Pom misses time, then the sox roll out of camp with Sale, Price, Porcello, Johnson, ??. The way the sox schedule is set up, you will need a 5th starter on April 2nd then not again until April 14th. Maybe Velazquez makes that April 2nd start and the sox hold Pom back until April 12th. That pushes Johnson back to the 14th. The schedule is really whacky. You will need a 4th and 5th starter first time through, but with the off days built in for the sox return to Fenway, you can run 3 starters out there for a turn before you have to use your 4 and 5 again. Gives the sox time to baby Pomeranz and an outside chance that ERod is ready by then

 

Don't count out Elias.

Posted

I actually think one or two of these four will be alright.

 

Johnsom

 

Velazquez

 

Elias

 

Beeks

 

I just hope we don;t have to go through 2-3 massive failures to find the one or two that work out.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Is there any MLB team out there that does not have a 25 man roster crunch and could use 2 of our out-of-options players?

 

In theory, I'd like to make a 2 or 3 for one trade for a decent 5/6th starter or a better LH'd RP'er than we have. My idea would look something like this:

 

Trade:

Johnson, Marrero and Travis

For:

A better SP'er than Johnson

 

Or,

 

Trade:

Hembree, Marrero and Ockimey (Beeks?)

For:

A LH'd RP'er (or 5/6 starter)

 

Or, we could just trade one out-of-options player for a player with options or a prospect.

 

I don't think guys like Marrero and Hembree carry a world of trade value, And dealing Hembree might create a Boggs in the pen, although not a huge one. The guy whose trade value might be piquing right now is Swihart, and as of now he is a bench option. If the Sox are going to make a move to bolster pitching and create a roster spot, Swihart would be the easiest to move and certainly get back a better player than Marrero would.

 

Not sure who would be available for Swihart. Certainly not Chris Archer or equivalent. So it comes down to who helps the overall team more: Swihart? Our a pitcher who can be acquired for Swihart (and ancillary pieces)?

Posted
I don't think guys like Marrero and Hembree carry a world of trade value, And dealing Hembree might create a Boggs in the pen, although not a huge one. The guy whose trade value might be piquing right now is Swihart, and as of now he is a bench option. If the Sox are going to make a move to bolster pitching and create a roster spot, Swihart would be the easiest to move and certainly get back a better player than Marrero would.

 

Not sure who would be available for Swihart. Certainly not Chris Archer or equivalent. So it comes down to who helps the overall team more: Swihart? Our a pitcher who can be acquired for Swihart (and ancillary pieces)?

 

I'm not thinking we'd get anyone great- just someone slightly better at a position of need in exchange for 2 guys with no options. The overall return value could even be a little less, if it's a position of need and we clear up roster issues from all these out-of-options players.

Posted
I don't think guys like Marrero and Hembree carry a world of trade value, And dealing Hembree might create a Boggs in the pen, although not a huge one. The guy whose trade value might be piquing right now is Swihart, and as of now he is a bench option. If the Sox are going to make a move to bolster pitching and create a roster spot, Swihart would be the easiest to move and certainly get back a better player than Marrero would.

 

Not sure who would be available for Swihart. Certainly not Chris Archer or equivalent. So it comes down to who helps the overall team more: Swihart? Our a pitcher who can be acquired for Swihart (and ancillary pieces)?

 

I do hope we could wait on dealing Swihart until he hypothetically could build up more value. A great Spring training can only go so far and I’d hate to sell low on a former #1 prospect who 1) was rushed to the majors in the first place, and 2) who’s only real fault was getting hurt.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I do hope we could wait on dealing Swihart until he hypothetically could build up more value. A great Spring training can only go so far and I’d hate to sell low on a former #1 prospect who 1) was rushed to the majors in the first place, and 2) who’s only real fault was getting hurt.

 

I agree with you Emp. I'm not sure what ultimately happens with Swihart but the only place I have heard much about possibly trading him is on this board. I suspect he'll make the 25 man and if he stays healthy and hits he'll see playing time somewhere. They won't just give away a guy with his potential. They really don't have any major pressing needs at this time.

Posted

I'm for keeping Swihart, at least for a few more months. I wanted him to stay, even before his hot start.

 

If he fizzles out, it's not like we can later say, we missed a chance at getting someone really good in March.

 

I like the idea of being able to PH for a catcher- maybe even twice in a game. Our catching position is, by far, our weakest offensive position.

 

Swihart can also play 1b and OF, so we can avoid playing JD in the OF, if Swihart hits well this year.

Posted
I'm for keeping Swihart, at least for a few more months. I wanted him to stay, even before his hot start.

 

If he fizzles out, it's not like we can later say, we missed a chance at getting someone really good in March.

 

I like the idea of being able to PH for a catcher- maybe even twice in a game. Our catching position is, by far, our weakest offensive position.

 

Swihart can also play 1b and OF, so we can avoid playing JD in the OF, if Swihart hits well this year.

 

If we can keep Swihart, what do you all think of this lineup?

 

Benitendi, LF

Betts, RF

Martinez, DH

Ramirez, 1B

Devers, 3B

Pedroia, 2B

Swihart, C

Bogaerts, SS

Bradly JR, CF

Posted
I agree with you Emp. I'm not sure what ultimately happens with Swihart but the only place I have heard much about possibly trading him is on this board. I suspect he'll make the 25 man and if he stays healthy and hits he'll see playing time somewhere. They won't just give away a guy with his potential. They really don't have any major pressing needs at this time.

 

I read a recent article that other teams are already inquiring about Swihart. Teams are smart, they’re looking to buy low. I just hope we’re smarter. I think there’s a good chance he cld increase his value over the course of a few months. Could be our best chance (a solid piece in a tade) to aquire another SP later on if need be.

Posted
If we can keep Swihart, what do you all think of this lineup?

 

Benitendi, LF

Betts, RF

Martinez, DH

Ramirez, 1B

Devers, 3B

Pedroia, 2B

Swihart, C

Bogaerts, SS

Bradly JR, CF

 

I don't think Swihart will start at the catcher position much, but he probably would be the best offense at the position of the 3.

Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)
I read a recent article that other teams are already inquiring about Swihart. Teams are smart, they’re looking to buy low. I just hope we’re smarter. I think there’s a good chance he cld increase his value over the course of a few months. Could be our best chance (a solid piece in a tade) to aquire another SP later on if need be.

 

There is a chance that he ultimately gets traded I guess - I hope not though. I think that there is also a chance that he winds up playing a very significant role for us going forward. Some of that will be determined I think by whether or not his catching skill improves. I know that I am wearing the label of being a DD lover but one thing I think I can say is that Dombrowski is not likely to be outsmarted by any other GM out there. He is an old horse trader.

Edited by cp176
Posted

I can see not wanting to carry 3 catchers, but since Swihart can play 1B & LF, I think we can make it work, even if just for the first part of the season.

 

I would not trade Swihart after a small ST'ing bump in his value. He could end up being worth much much more.

Posted
I can see not wanting to carry 3 catchers, but since Swihart can play 1B & LF, I think we can make it work, even if just for the first part of the season.

 

I would not trade Swihart after a small ST'ing bump in his value. He could end up being worth much much more.

 

Especially to a team with a you-know-what possibly looming in its future.

Posted
Especially to a team with a you-know-what possibly looming in its future.

 

He does have 4 arb years starting in 2019.

 

Vaz and Leon have 2 more arb years.

Posted (edited)
especially to a team with a you-know-what possibly looming in its future.

 

Cliff Lee.jpg

 

 

You talking about me, punk? Where in the hell is Kimmi?

Edited by Nick
Old-Timey Member
Posted
[ATTACH=CONFIG]588[/ATTACH]

 

 

You talking about me, punk? Where in the hell is Kimmi?

 

I love you too Nick.

Posted

I'm not against Swihart making the roster, and I'm going to be excited if he does and rooting for him but...BUT (but usually precedes something stupid, eh?). But he's out of options. My point is, I'm not going to be crying foul if they decide to keep him in Pawtucket.

 

If Swihart is struggling at the MLB by the time Pedroia comes back the Sox are going to have a tough decision to make.

Posted
I'm not against Swihart making the roster, and I'm going to be excited if he does and rooting for him but...BUT (but usually precedes something stupid, eh?). But he's out of options. My point is, I'm not going to be crying foul if they decide to keep him in Pawtucket.

 

If Swihart is struggling at the MLB by the time Pedroia comes back the Sox are going to have a tough decision to make.

 

The guy always had natural ability. I just don't think it simply goes away. He has no trade value. I'd keep him.

Posted
There is a chance that he ultimately gets traded I guess - I hope not though. I think that there is also a chance that he winds up playing a very significant role for us going forward. Some of that will be determined I think by whether or not his catching skill improves. I know that I am wearing the label of being a DD lover but one thing I think I can say is that Dombrowski is not likely to be outsmarted by any other GM out there. He is an old horse trader.

 

I’d like it better he stuck on and contributed long term, sure. But if he got his value up close to what it was ( & I’m going w/ a 65% chance that could happen) getting something of value back in a trade later in the season could be huge for our chances this year. These are best case scenarios. But for the fans that think we need another meaningful SP, this could be our only chance to get one. So, by all means, either way, root for Swihart. :)

Posted
I'm not against Swihart making the roster, and I'm going to be excited if he does and rooting for him but...BUT (but usually precedes something stupid, eh?). But he's out of options. My point is, I'm not going to be crying foul if they decide to keep him in Pawtucket.

 

If Swihart is struggling at the MLB by the time Pedroia comes back the Sox are going to have a tough decision to make.

 

Yes, and a decision to make about where Nunez gets continued PAs.

 

At that time, we might have a catcher on the DL or know enough about Swihart's relationship with our staff to feel secure enough to trade or dump Leon.

 

Another option would be to trade JBJ for a SP'er, use JD and Nunez in LF and move Beni to CF. This seriously hurts our OF defense, but the offense could be stronger. How good the pitcher we get in return would be the key for me agreeing with this plan. Swihart could then play some DH or 1B or LF as HRam DHs or sits so as not to vest.

 

There's all kinds of scenarios that could allow Swihart to play more often, if he is doing well.

 

If he's not doing well, the choice will actually be easier.

 

I'm hopeful.

 

Posted

Moustakas signs for $6.5M! What a steal!

 

$5.5M/1

 

$1M buyout on mutual option 2nd year at $15M.

 

I'm starting to wonder, if we might have spent our money in a better way.

 

Low risk- short term deals to 3-4 players instead of one big one for JD.

Posted
Moustakas signs for $6.5M! What a steal!

 

$5.5M/1

 

$1M buyout on mutual option 2nd year at $15M.

 

I'm starting to wonder, if we might have spent our money in a better way.

 

Low risk- short term deals to 3-4 players instead of one big one for JD.

 

You do know that Sox can only carry 25 players, right?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...