Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Even though our ability to score runs has been frustratingly inconsistent and our pen has been pretty good, I think a late inning reliever is a bigger need than a small upgrade at 3B. Kelly's injury sounds like it may be long term.

 

Adding someone like Frazier (or even Beltre, for that matter) isn't going to solve our offensive problems. The guys that we have still need to perform like they are capable of performing.

 

The way I see it, if you add Frazier you're certainly not expecting to solve offensive problems. You're just hoping he might help you win a game or two down the stretch with a timely long ball. He might even just be a bridge to Devers in September.

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
The way I see it, if you add Frazier you're certainly not expecting to solve offensive problems. You're just hoping he might help you win a game or two down the stretch with a timely long ball. He might even just be a bridge to Devers in September.

 

Not worth the cost.

Posted

You guys have just about talked me out of Frazier... the Big D may not be reading this forum, however:

 

Bob Nightengale‏Verified account @BNightengale 28m28 minutes ago

The #Redsox moving closer to acquiring #Whitesox 3B Todd Frazier. Be interesting if Boston can get David Robertson as setup man in package

Posted
You guys have just about talked me out of Frazier... the Big D may not be reading this forum, however:

 

Bob Nightengale‏Verified account @BNightengale 28m28 minutes ago

The #Redsox moving closer to acquiring #Whitesox 3B Todd Frazier. Be interesting if Boston can get David Robertson as setup man in package

I wouldn't mind picking him up if we got Robertson too.
Posted

I said it in the beginning and I'll say it now. The Sox need a late inning reliever and a 3B who can hit NOW.

 

If you can get Frazier/Robertson without giving up Groome/Devers.........you do it.

Posted
I said it in the beginning and I'll say it now. The Sox need a late inning reliever and a 3B who can hit NOW.

 

If you can get Frazier/Robertson without giving up Groome/Devers.........you do it.

 

Isn't Frazier only hitting .213?

Posted
Isn't Frazier only hitting .213?

 

Yep, which is why the Red Sox might be better off saving their prospects for a more potent bat, e.g., Y.Alonso, and let Devers take over 3b in September.

Posted
Isn't Frazier only hitting .213?

 

That is after a poor opening to the season. Hitting better the last month and with some power. We are not winning the division with the current platoon at 3B. The rest of the lineup doesn't hit enough to carry them. Lin is probably a younger version of Holt.

Posted (edited)
The way I see it, if you add Frazier you're certainly not expecting to solve offensive problems. You're just hoping he might help you win a game or two down the stretch with a timely long ball. He might even just be a bridge to Devers in September.

This year Todd Frazier has posted a wRC+ 104 -- with rest-of-season projections of 101, 106 and 103 -- at a position where Red Sox third basemen have produced a wRC+ of 61 this year:

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=785&position=3B

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=3b&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2017&month=0&season1=2017&ind=0&team=0,ts&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=16,d

 

Frazier has an OPS+ of 107 while Red Sox third basemen have an sOPS+ of 63.

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/f/frazito01.shtml

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/split.cgi?t=b&team=BOS&year=2017

 

Many Red Sox fans underestimate Frazier's worth. ZiPS, Steamer and FanGraphs Depth Charts have only four Red Sox hitters exceeding the rest-of-season WAR projections of Frazier (who is projected to produce at least at the level of Andrew Benintendi).

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/projections.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&type=rzips&team=3&lg=all&players=0&sort=24,d

Edited by harmony
Posted (edited)
Isn't Frazier only hitting .213?

With an on-base percentage of .330 (compared to the .292 OBP posted by Red Sox third basemen this year).

 

Batting average is so rarely cited in player valuations these days.

 

As a side note, the huge new scoreboard at San Diego's Petco Park has so much information that I struggled to find the stats I wanted. But one player stat was conspicuous in its absence: batting average. Times have changed.

Edited by harmony
Posted
This year Todd Frazier has posted a wRC+ 104 -- with rest-of-season projections of 101, 106 and 103 -- at a position where Red Sox third basemen have produced a wRC+ of 61 this year:

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=785&position=3B

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=3b&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2017&month=0&season1=2017&ind=0&team=0,ts&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=16,d

 

Frazier has an OPS+ of 107 while Red Sox third basemen have an sOPS+ of 63.

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/f/frazito01.shtml

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/split.cgi?t=b&team=BOS&year=2017

 

Many Red Sox fans underestimate Frazier's worth. ZiPS, Steamer and FanGraphs Depth Charts have only four Red Sox hitters exceeding the rest-of-season WAR projections of Frazier (who is projected to produce at least at the level of Andrew Benintendi).

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/projections.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&type=rzips&team=3&lg=all&players=0&sort=24,d

 

I totally agree with you. Plus you do not lose a lot with his glove. DD needs to make this happen before the Sox throw the season away.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
The arguement against going after someone like Frazier would be that even if he provided an upgrade over what we currently send out there to third, it would likely not really be much of a difference maker. Trading anyone for him so that he could play the position for the rest of this season just doesn't seem to make any sense. He ain't that good.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
The way I see it, if you add Frazier you're certainly not expecting to solve offensive problems. You're just hoping he might help you win a game or two down the stretch with a timely long ball. He might even just be a bridge to Devers in September.

 

Fair enough. It all depends on what he costs, of course.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
You guys have just about talked me out of Frazier... the Big D may not be reading this forum, however:

 

Bob Nightengale‏Verified account @BNightengale 28m28 minutes ago

The #Redsox moving closer to acquiring #Whitesox 3B Todd Frazier. Be interesting if Boston can get David Robertson as setup man in package

 

Robertson would put us over the luxury tax limit. This might be doable if the White Sox are willing to eat some of his remaining salary.

Posted
Robertson would put us over the luxury tax limit. This might be doable if the White Sox are willing to eat some of his remaining salary.

 

 

Contracts are paid out over a 6 month time frame. If Boston acquires Robertson any time now until the deadline they pick up only 4 mill of the 12 mill owed to the player. Same with Frazier. You could get both for 8mill for the remaining 17 season. That is not taking into account what the luxury tax % hit was on those two contracts. Remember, Sale making 12 mill, only 6 counts towards the luxury tax cap...

 

Right now I had Boston at around 185 million vs luxury tax of 195 give or take the draft picks signed and international pool money.

 

I figure there is 10 to spend..

Posted
Ding ding ding.

 

We have a winner.

 

He'd probably could be had for a rookie ball prospect. Decent bat, and good insurance if Devers struggles when he gets the call.

 

I think we should call the Padres about Solarte, though. Cost is probably too high, but he'd a be a bigger impact player than Frazier.

Posted
He'd probably could be had for a rookie ball prospect. Decent bat, and good insurance if Devers struggles when he gets the call.

 

I think we should call the Padres about Solarte, though. Cost is probably too high, but he'd a be a bigger impact player than Frazier.

ZiPS, Steamer and FanGraphs Depth Charts project rest-of-season WAR of 1.0, 1.2 and 1.2 for Todd Frazier and 0.7, 0.8 and 0.8 for Yangervis Solarte:

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=785&position=3B

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=5352&position=2B/3B

 

Because he comes with two more years of team control, Solarte is likely to cost more in trade (for less immediate contribution).

Posted
ZiPS, Steamer and FanGraphs Depth Charts project rest-of-season WAR of 1.0, 1.2 and 1.2 for Todd Frazier and 0.7, 0.8 and 0.8 for Yangervis Solarte:

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=785&position=3B

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=5352&position=2B/3B

 

Because he comes with two more years of team control, Solarte is likely to cost more in trade (for less immediate contribution).

 

I think Solarte is better than the projected offensive number Fangraphs have, but I wouldn't complain if we got Frazier.

Posted

Why are we afraid to trot out Devers? Lin came up and performed better than expected. All Devers has to do is what he's been doing.

 

IT COSTS US NOTHING TO HAVE A LOOK. NOTHING. MEANWHILE WE'RE GOING TO EXPEND MONEY AND PROSPECTS FOR A RENTAL. UNFREAKING BELIEVABLE.

Community Moderator
Posted
Why are we afraid to trot out Devers? Lin came up and performed better than expected. All Devers has to do is what he's been doing.

 

IT COSTS US NOTHING TO HAVE A LOOK. NOTHING. MEANWHILE WE'RE GOING TO EXPEND MONEY AND PROSPECTS FOR A RENTAL. UNFREAKING BELIEVABLE.

 

^^^

Posted
Why are we afraid to trot out Devers? Lin came up and performed better than expected. All Devers has to do is what he's been doing.

 

IT COSTS US NOTHING TO HAVE A LOOK. NOTHING. MEANWHILE WE'RE GOING TO EXPEND MONEY AND PROSPECTS FOR A RENTAL. UNFREAKING BELIEVABLE.

 

what he said - now i do not know if there is a free spot on the 40 for him yet ... well, DFAing Pablo creates one for sure

Community Moderator
Posted
what he said - now i do not know if there is a free spot on the 40 for him yet ... well, DFAing Pablo creates one for sure

 

There are spots.

 

Selsky

Kyle Martin

Noe Ramirez

Posted
Why are we afraid to trot out Devers? Lin came up and performed better than expected. All Devers has to do is what he's been doing.

 

IT COSTS US NOTHING TO HAVE A LOOK. NOTHING. MEANWHILE WE'RE GOING TO EXPEND MONEY AND PROSPECTS FOR A RENTAL. UNFREAKING BELIEVABLE.

 

Bogaerts was higher regarded and had better numbers than Devers when he was called up in 2013, and he still struggled making the adjustment. Most prospects do. It doesn't hurt to have an insurance policy.

Posted
what he said - now i do not know if there is a free spot on the 40 for him yet ... well, DFAing Pablo creates one for sure

 

Pretty sure Holt took Pablo's 40-man slot when they activated him off the 60-day DL (players on the 60 day don't count towards the 40-man)

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Contracts are paid out over a 6 month time frame. If Boston acquires Robertson any time now until the deadline they pick up only 4 mill of the 12 mill owed to the player. Same with Frazier. You could get both for 8mill for the remaining 17 season. That is not taking into account what the luxury tax % hit was on those two contracts. Remember, Sale making 12 mill, only 6 counts towards the luxury tax cap...

 

Right now I had Boston at around 185 million vs luxury tax of 195 give or take the draft picks signed and international pool money.

 

I figure there is 10 to spend..

 

I don't know what the exact figures are, but my understanding is that we have about $6 mil to spare and acquiring Frazier and Robertson would cost us about $8 mil. I read yesterday that getting both would put us over. I may very well be misinformed.

Community Moderator
Posted
Pretty sure Holt took Pablo's 40-man slot when they activated him off the 60-day DL (players on the 60 day don't count towards the 40-man)

 

The only remaining guy on the 60 day that could see time this year is Carson Smith.

 

Selsky's spot is useless imo.

Community Moderator
Posted
I don't know what the exact figures are, but my understanding is that we have about $6 mil to spare and acquiring Frazier and Robertson would cost us about $8 mil. I read yesterday that getting both would put us over. I may very well be misinformed.

 

I don't think the Sox will get Robertson. If they get Frazier, I hope it's on the cheap. Otherwise, it's a waste of prospects to me. If he was on a longer deal and they wanted to move him to 1b, I'd understand the trade.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...