Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Immaturity isn't our problem here from what I've noticed with our elder posters.

 

Keep me posted for when it is. I’m actually holding back…

  • Replies 7.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • moonslav59

    2278

  • mvp 78

    1228

  • notin

    1146

  • Bellhorn04

    734

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
If Ward pitches well this season, you have a strong case to just let Bloom go even if the Sox aren't a dumpster fire.

 

 

I doubt he gets let go for that specific move. But the big picture at present doesn’t look good.

 

I mean, we saw a GM select an unprotected Johan Santana in the Rule 5 draft and then trade him for some random human being named Jared Camp. That GM was Dave Dombrowski, and it didn’t inhibit his ability to build a career..

Edited by notin
Posted
I do think Tapia means Duran gets DFAd. And as he’s extremely unlikely to clear waivers, I’d think he does get traded.

 

But trading him for any of the aforementioned shortstops, while it makes sense from a baseball perspective, fails to achieve the objective of DFAing Duran in the first place, which is clearing a 40 man roster spot for Duvall…

 

DFA Ort to make room for Duvall. Trade Duran for a SS (or 2BMan.)

Posted
When all is said, and done in this offseason how many other big market clubs with a payroll as big as the Red Sox will have as many question marks entering the season? Good Golly Miss Molly.
Posted
When all is said, and done in this offseason how many other big market clubs with a payroll as big as the Red Sox will have as many question marks entering the season? Good Golly Miss Molly.

 

Not many

Posted
For that Yankee fan I formerly respected, only number that is meaningful is 4-1 as we enter 2023 season.
Posted
When all is said, and done in this offseason how many other big market clubs with a payroll as big as the Red Sox will have as many question marks entering the season? Good Golly Miss Molly.

 

Most teams have a lot of questions, but yes indeed, we have more than our fair share, especially for the large, player budget we have.

 

Our highest contracts seem to be the biggest question marks.

 

$313M/10 Devers- some question his D and weight

$145M/5 Sale- too many questions to list

$140M/6 Story- Injury questions

$90M/5 Yoshida- No MLB experience questions

$32M/2 Jansen- age regression questions

$22M/2 Turner- age regression

$19M/2 Barnes- inconsistency

$18M/2 Martin- age

$10M/1 Kike- injury

$10M/1 Kluber- injury/age

$7M/1 Duval- age/recent regression

Verdugo, Pivetta, Arroyo, McGuire, Casas- good enough?

Paxton- injury

Houck/Whitlock- starter/reliever?

 

Many more than this.

 

 

Posted
I do think Tapia means Duran gets DFAd. And as he’s extremely unlikely to clear waivers, I’d think he does get traded.

 

But trading him for any of the aforementioned shortstops, while it makes sense from a baseball perspective, fails to achieve the objective of DFAing Duran in the first place, which is clearing a 40 man roster spot for Duvall…

Tapia is better than Duran. Not a bad move.
Posted

Sox made an offer that Devers couldn't refuse. Tax hit is only $29M. No second guessing now.

 

We will alway have the Fill Ins on short term deal.

 

I viewed Bloom's job to be developing inhouse talen.

I can go buy players. I am wwilling to wait.

Community Moderator
Posted
It might matter how well Yoshida, Jansen, Martin, Turner and Duvall are doing.

 

There have been some significant unforced errors by Ben. Those just can't happen.

Community Moderator
Posted
I swear you said that exact same thing (except for the year, obviously) in 2018…

 

In 2021 it was the "I've been right for 7 straight years about the Sox and they are going to suck this year."

Posted
The Sox seem to be assembling a half way decent ball club . A team that should be able to pass the Orioles and possibly the Rays , if Tampa Bay continues to drop off. However , this team does not look like it can match up with the top tier teams. A healthy and productive Chris Sale would be key , but that might be asking for too much.
Posted
The final tax budget numbers for 2022 are in. The Sox went over by $1.2M, which caused our comp picks for losing Bogey and Nate to fall a couple rounds.

 

Thanks, Bloom!

 

Incorrect number, though. They paid $1.2 mill but were over by $6 mill. Per Cot's:

 

2022: $1,229,936 tax on CBT payroll of $236,149,678 with $230M threshold and a rate of 20 percent as a first-time payor.

Posted
DFA Ort to make room for Duvall. Trade Duran for a SS (or 2BMan.)

 

Ort appears to be immovable. Whatever blackmail he has on Bloom, it’s apparently rock solid…

Posted
The Sox seem to be assembling a half way decent ball club . A team that should be able to pass the Orioles and possibly the Rays , if Tampa Bay continues to drop off. However , this team does not look like it can match up with the top tier teams. A healthy and productive Chris Sale would be key , but that might be asking for too much.

 

Half way decent remains to be seen, but what they are building is one of the oldest teams in the league, and might get there with a old SS, or two.

Posted
There have been some significant unforced errors by Ben. Those just can't happen.

 

No doubt, but again, when 95% of your deals are $7M or under, what is the expected success rate?

Community Moderator
Posted
Ort appears to be immovable. Whatever blackmail he has on Bloom, it’s apparently rock solid…

 

1. Options

2. Velo

3. ???

Posted
Half way decent remains to be seen, but what they are building is one of the oldest teams in the league, and might get there with a old SS, or two.

 

No way are they the oldest.

 

Last year, the Sox were the 11th oldest team with an average age of 28.8 years, just behind the Miami Marlins. Adding Jansen, Martin and Duvall certainly ups them a bit lit. But bear in mind we also lost Rich Hill, among others…

Community Moderator
Posted
No doubt, but again, when 95% of your deals are $7M or under, what is the expected success rate?

 

What I mean is (a) going over the CBT in a year you wind up in last DAMN, (B) letting your prospect get picked 1/1 in the Rule 5 draft when you protected a whole bunch of nonsense, © trading Renfroe because he was going to be too expensive for an even more expensive JBJ, (d) letting your star SS go for a QO pick when you probably could have re-signed him for cheaper money in previous years (e) etc.

 

I'm not talking about FA signings or that didn't work out, just the things that were so obvious that he must have been hit over the head with a frying pan to not notice what was going on while these were occurring.

Community Moderator
Posted
No way are they the oldest.

 

Last year, the Sox were the 11th oldest team with an average age of 28.8 years, just behind the Miami Marlins. Adding Jansen, Martin and Duvall certainly ups them a bit lit. But bear in mind we also lost Rich Hill, among others…

 

When fans only pay attention to one team, they sky is always falling.

Posted
What I mean is (a) going over the CBT in a year you wind up in last DAMN, (B) letting your prospect get picked 1/1 in the Rule 5 draft when you protected a whole bunch of nonsense, © trading Renfroe because he was going to be too expensive for an even more expensive JBJ, (d) letting your star SS go for a QO pick when you probably could have re-signed him for cheaper money in previous years (e) etc.

 

I'm not talking about FA signings or that didn't work out, just the things that were so obvious that he must have been hit over the head with a frying pan to not notice what was going on while these were occurring.

 

Yes, I'm fully aware of many of the dumb choices made by this group of leaders. You mentioned most of the worst and most impactful ones. I'd add a few more, too, like our fascination with LF'ers and moving GG caliber defenders to other positions, but agreed.

 

Some moves made before this group took over had lasting affects... like the Sale extension, leaving a farm that produced just Houck over a 5 year span, and a bloated budget.

Posted
1. Options

2. Velo

3. ???

 

Also, Ort has gas. True. But so did Jacob Wallace, who was traded away. So did Julian Merryweather, whom he passed up on waivers. So does Manny Rodriguez, sitting out there on waivers right now.

 

Ort throws hard. But so do a lot of pitchers…

Posted
What I mean is (a) going over the CBT in a year you wind up in last DAMN, (B) letting your prospect get picked 1/1 in the Rule 5 draft when you protected a whole bunch of nonsense, © trading Renfroe because he was going to be too expensive for an even more expensive JBJ, (d) letting your star SS go for a QO pick when you probably could have re-signed him for cheaper money in previous years (e) etc.

 

I'm not talking about FA signings or that didn't work out, just the things that were so obvious that he must have been hit over the head with a frying pan to not notice what was going on while these were occurring.

 

I’d say this sums things up pretty dam well.

Posted
Half way decent remains to be seen, but what they are building is one of the oldest teams in the league, and might get there with a old SS, or two.

 

They are hoping to get AARP as a sponsor.

Posted
They are hoping to get AARP as a sponsor.

 

At least the older guy contracts are 1-2 year deals.

 

We will be one of the youngest teams by next year.

Posted

Age Player Years of control

 

38 Turner (1-2)

36 Martin (2), Kluber (1-2)

35 Jansen (2), Brasier (1)

34 Paxton (1)

33 Sale (2-3)

32 Barnes (1-2)

31 Kike (1), Refsnyder (2), J Rodriguez (3)

30 Story (5), Ort (5+)

 

Posted
At least the older guy contracts are 1-2 year deals.

 

We will be one of the youngest teams by next year.

 

But will they be better??? That’s all that counts. Lots of hopes, and wishes for all these prospects you’ve been touting.

Posted
But will they be better??? That’s all that counts. Lots of hopes, and wishes for all these prospects you’ve been touting.

 

It's almost all speculation, but with the increase in the amount of promising prospects called up last summer and scheduled to see time in 2023, I'm thinking there is good reason to be optimistic that some will help, perhaps greatly.

 

I'm sure several will fail, but I count 15 recent grads and upcoming prospects that should or may see time, this season:

 

5 Recent Grads: Bello, Wong, Crawford, Wink & Ort

 

3 Second Seasons: Casas, Kelly, German

 

8 First Timers in 2023: Mayer, Rafaela, Mata, Walter, Murphy, EValdez, RHern, Hamilton

 

There is certainly reason for caution and doubt, but I sense you are not very optimistic about the new crop of prospects.

 

I could be wrong, but it looks vastly better than...

 

Houck

Dalbec

Duran

Downs

Chavis

DHern

Shawaryn

BJohnson

Lakins

 

That's only 9 guys from Devers in 2017 to Bello in 2022 (5 years!)

 

Less names.

 

Worse names.

 

I think we have good reason to be cautiously optimistic.

 

On this area, I think Bloom and even DD deserve some credit, but we'll know more, soon enough.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...