The 2021-2022 Offseason Thread

[mvp 78]

Picking and choosing which players we got for the money isn't much of a methodology.

 

It's on point for moon though.

[moonslav59]

Who has more career GS, IP, lower WHIP and ERA in MLB: Weiland or Ranaudo? I'll hang up and listen. Thanks.

 

Okay. I'll sub Ranaudo for Weiland.

 

It's such an important fix.

[mvp 78]

Yeah, just like age.

 

Some sayings are stoopid.

 

I don't know why you got to hate on Aaliyah (RIP) today. Jeez...

[mvp 78]

Okay. I'll sub Ranaudo for Weiland.

 

It's such an important fix.

 

I thought you said he didn't qualify?

[notin]

True. There has still be a long drought (though Kopech would have been here if he hadn't been dealt).

 

Ditto Montas...

[notin]

Height ain't nuthin but a number.

 

Technically, height is two numbers...

[moonslav59]

It's on point for moon though.

 

Like your pick of Ranaudo over Weiland?

[moonslav59]

Technically, height is two numbers...

 

not in CMs

[moonslav59]

I thought you said he didn't qualify?

 

I did not think he was as "good" as Ranaudo.

 

The whole point was sarcastic, but I see you enjoy picking everything I say apart (not that I don't do the same pretty often).

 

I'm fine subbing Ranaudo for Weiland in my sarcastic post.

 

Now, I'll wait for you next nit-picking comment.

[mvp 78]

Technically, height is two numbers...

 

No.

[mvp 78]

Ditto Montas...

 

Montas would have never made MLB if he hadn't been traded out of the dreadful BOSOX starting pitching development program.

[mvp 78]

I did not think he was as "good" as Ranaudo.

 

The whole point was sarcastic, but I see you enjoy picking everything I say apart (not that I don't do the same pretty often).

 

I'm fine subbing Ranaudo for Weiland in my sarcastic post.

 

Now, I'll wait for you next nit-picking comment.

 

I mean, if you want nits still hanging out in your posts, go for it. I'm just trying to make you a better poster.

[notin]

not in CMs

 

My lack of desire to express my height in cms is exactly why I avoid Europe...

[notin]

No.

 

you're only saying that because you're 5' 0"...

[moonslav59]

I mean, if you want nits still hanging out in your posts, go for it. I'm just trying to make you a better poster.

 

Is that your goal?

[mvp 78]

you're only saying that because you're 5' 0"...

 

If only I was that tall.

[mvp 78]

Is that your goal?

 

That's everyone's goal on here.

[notin]

If only I was that tall.

 

Start wearing high heels...

[moonslav59]

That's everyone's goal on here.

 

That helps me understand your mentality.

[mvp 78]

Start wearing high heels...

 

They don't make them in youth sizes.

[5GoldGlovesOF,75]

you're only saying that because you're 5' 0"...

 

That's 1,524 millimeters!

[Dojji]

I’d stack Workman, Barnes, Beeks, Weiland and Wilson up against any other team’s top pitching prospects over the last 14 years!

 

No Steven Wright? i know he fell off rapidly after he got hurt but he had it going for a couple years there.

[notin]

No Steven Wright? i know he fell off rapidly after he got hurt but he had it going for a couple years there.

 

But he was technically a product on the Cleveland farm system...

[notin]

That's 1,524 millimeters!

 

If we are going to use the single number height system and be all metric about it, at the very least all heights should be expressed on Angstroms or, for taller people, like people over 6'2", hectometers. Nothing else is acceptable...

[mvp 78]

If we are going to use the single number height system and be all metric about it, at the very least all heights should be expressed on Angstroms or, for taller people, like people over 6'2", hectometers. Nothing else is acceptable...

 

I saw a news story the other day where someone stated their neighbor was 2 acres away. The was unacceptable to me.

[moonslav59]

No Steven Wright? i know he fell off rapidly after he got hurt but he had it going for a couple years there.

 

We traded for him. The list was for all the "greats" brought up through the Sox system since Buchholz.

[Bellhorn04]

If we are going to use the single number height system and be all metric about it, at the very least all heights should be expressed on Angstroms or, for taller people, like people over 6'2", hectometers. Nothing else is acceptable...

 

It actually works with inches too. And you can even say something like 5.88 feet tall, and not be wrong.

[notin]

I saw a news story the other day where someone stated their neighbor was 2 acres away. The was unacceptable to me.

 

Did he follow up with "And the guy on the other side is at least 110 volts further than that"?

[notin]

It actually works with inches too. And you can even say something like 5.88 feet tall, and not be wrong.

 

No. That's wrong. Even in Canada...

[Bellhorn04]

No. That's wrong. Even in Canada...

 

How's it wrong?