Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Yes, and they don't calculate it till after the season. There are year end accounting adjustments to be made by the bean-counters for things like opt-outs that are exercised.

 

I remember one year, I think the Sox felt like they got under the limit, but ended up over by a very small amount.

  • Replies 4.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Tanaka is apparently looking for $15+M/1.

 

I will be really annoyed if this is true. $4 mil for a better known and healthier commodity. Kluber isnt a power pitcher either, so it isnt like we are getting a guy with better stuff.

Posted
I remember one year, I think the Sox felt like they got under the limit, but ended up over by a very small amount.

 

I think I already looked into that and found it wasn't so.

Posted
I think I already looked into that and found it wasn't so.

 

I think we paid just $21K in 1999. That does not mean we thought we stayed under, but we did cut it pretty close. Had we dumped some of our plaayers a few weeks early, we'd have reset in 1999- not that it would have made a world of difference.

Posted
@Rotoworld_BB

Report: Blue Jays are a "finalist' for Kirby Yates

 

Also pr MLBTR. Although I strongly suspect they use Rotoworld as a source...

Community Moderator
Posted
Also pr MLBTR. Although I strongly suspect they use Rotoworld as a source...

 

Yeah, I think MLBTR relies on everyone else for their info.

Posted
Yeah, I think MLBTR relies on everyone else for their info.

 

They do, and they readily admit it. They really just started out compiling blogs and online articles from a variety of sources and bringing them all on to one website.

 

But they also do use fantasy advice site Rotoworld (who does the same thing) as one of those sources. Numerous times, I've seen updates on Rotoworld that would appear later on MLBTR. So either they peruse Rotoworld or use the same sources, only slower. (And with more in-depth coverage)..

Community Moderator
Posted
They do, and they readily admit it. They really just started out compiling blogs and online articles from a variety of sources and bringing them all on to one website.

 

But they also do use fantasy advice site Rotoworld (who does the same thing) as one of those sources. Numerous times, I've seen updates on Rotoworld that would appear later on MLBTR. So either they peruse Rotoworld or use the same sources, only slower. (And with more in-depth coverage)..

 

I appreciate that they just compile info from everywhere. I don't have the time to check 10 different websites about which C level player the Sox will sign next.

Posted
I appreciate that they just compile info from everywhere. I don't have the time to check 10 different websites about which C level player the Sox will sign next.

 

Oh I've been reading it since it launched and my only complaint is kicking myself for not thinking of doing it first.

 

And I would bet they look at far more than 10 websites. The closest I can come to that level of research is checking out he "Player News" section on Baseball-Reference to see what the chatter is, and even then that can only be done for one player at a time..

Posted
Liam Hendriks signs with CWS. The closer will receive a $1MM signing bonus, $11MM in 2021, $13MM in 2022, $14MM in 2023, and then the $15MM option/buyout for 2024. The option will automatically vest if Hendriks is traded.
Posted
Angels to sign Quintana.

 

Looks like Odorizzi is the only guy left, for us, IMO.

 

Well there are a slew of former Yankee starters no one seems to want.

 

Also, there is another sneaky and possibly underrated option out there.

 

Trevor Bauer: 1190 IP, 3.62 ERA, 2.82 K/BB

Julio Teheran: 1391 IP, 3.81 ERA, 2.54 K/BB

 

Bauer does have a better FIP (3.85 to 4.33), which is the basis of fWAR, so he also has the advantage there (19.1 to 12.8). Also the better ERA+ (113 to 106). Both players are the same age. (Bauer is 10 days older.)

 

Bauer is clearly better, but how much better? And when you consider he is looking for maybe $200+ over 6 years and Teheran can probably be had for 1 year $10mill, is this difference between the two so substantial?

 

Jake Odorizzi also fits in well in this comp, as his ERA (3.92), ERA+ (105), FIP (4.12), K/BB (3.09), and fWAR (13.7) make him an option roughly equal to Teheran. And he is only 9 months older than the other two...

Community Moderator
Posted
Well there are a slew of former Yankee starters no one seems to want.

 

Also, there is another sneaky and possibly underrated option out there.

 

Trevor Bauer: 1190 IP, 3.62 ERA, 2.82 K/BB

Julio Teheran: 1391 IP, 3.81 ERA, 2.54 K/BB

 

Bauer does have a better FIP (3.85 to 4.33), which is the basis of fWAR, so he also has the advantage there (19.1 to 12.8). Also the better ERA+ (113 to 106). Both players are the same age. (Bauer is 10 days older.)

 

Bauer is clearly better, but how much better? And when you consider he is looking for maybe $200+ over 6 years and Teheran can probably be had for 1 year $10mill, is this difference between the two so substantial?

 

Jake Odorizzi also fits in well in this comp, as his ERA (3.92), ERA+ (105), FIP (4.12), K/BB (3.09), and fWAR (13.7) make him an option roughly equal to Teheran. And he is only 9 months older than the other two...

 

They did go to see Teheran throw yesterday. Odorizzi is more durable though, correct?

Posted
Well there are a slew of former Yankee starters no one seems to want.

 

Also, there is another sneaky and possibly underrated option out there.

 

Trevor Bauer: 1190 IP, 3.62 ERA, 2.82 K/BB

Julio Teheran: 1391 IP, 3.81 ERA, 2.54 K/BB

 

Bauer does have a better FIP (3.85 to 4.33), which is the basis of fWAR, so he also has the advantage there (19.1 to 12.8). Also the better ERA+ (113 to 106). Both players are the same age. (Bauer is 10 days older.)

 

Bauer is clearly better, but how much better? And when you consider he is looking for maybe $200+ over 6 years and Teheran can probably be had for 1 year $10mill, is this difference between the two so substantial?

 

Jake Odorizzi also fits in well in this comp, as his ERA (3.92), ERA+ (105), FIP (4.12), K/BB (3.09), and fWAR (13.7) make him an option roughly equal to Teheran. And he is only 9 months older than the other two...

 

I'd welcome both Odorizzi and Teheran. But I just don't see Bloom spending even $10 mil on any pitcher right now. Look at the starters that have already signed; average cost was around $10 or $11 mil -- if Bloom was really desperate to add arms, he could've had any of them. Quintana just signed for $8; Bloom chose to keep Perez at a little over half that.

 

Might as well forget about a top reliever, too. Hendriks got a ton, so Hand will benefit from the losing bidders. But Yates just signed for $4.5 plus incentives... what price stability?

Posted
Well there are a slew of former Yankee starters no one seems to want.

 

Also, there is another sneaky and possibly underrated option out there.

 

I'd be okay with Tanaka or Odorizzi. I just don't see Tanaka wanting to play here.

 

I guess you could say Paxton is as good as Odorizzi, so maybe he'd be okay.

 

I'm hoping for Odorizzi, the guy I thought might be the best SP'er for the money, this winter.

 

If we don't get Hand, and it looks like we won't, I'm not sure there is anybody left I'd view as a lock down closer.

Posted
I'd welcome both Odorizzi and Teheran. But I just don't see Bloom spending even $10 mil on any pitcher right now. Look at the starters that have already signed; average cost was around $10 or $11 mil -- if Bloom was really desperate to add arms, he could've had any of them. Quintana just signed for $8; Bloom chose to keep Perez at a little over half that.

 

Might as well forget about a top reliever, too. Hendriks got a ton, so Hand will benefit from the losing bidders. But Yates just signed for $4.5 plus incentives... what price stability?

 

Well, Bloom has been checking in on Colome apparently, or did at one point. Petit averages out to about 1 fWAR per year over the last 4 and 0.7 fWAR per year over the last 3 but has never made more than $5.5 mill and is not likely to get hat much this year...

Posted
So is the best we can hope for is Odorizzi, Colome, Kike and Pillar, then maybe trade Beni for a RP'er or lesser RP'er and CF'er/RF'er?
Posted
So is the best we can hope for is Odorizzi, Colome, Kike and Pillar, then maybe trade Beni for a RP'er or lesser RP'er and CF'er/RF'er?

 

We also heard they had interest in Garrett Richards.

Posted (edited)
So is the best we can hope for is Odorizzi, Colome, Kike and Pillar, then maybe trade Beni for a RP'er or lesser RP'er and CF'er/RF'er?

 

If the Sox signed Ordoizzi/Teheran and Colome and Enrique Hernandez and JBJ/Pillar (or ?). That's a decent start. I'd deal Chavis for a RP. Per BTV, some relievers roughly equal to Chavis in value and whose availablity is not listed as "Low" include Wander Suero of Washington and Anthony Reyes of St. Louis. I don't see the Cardinals dealing Reyes for Chavis. Also the Yankees' Jonathan Loasigia, but we all know that sin't happening.

 

SP: Odorizzi (Teheran)/ERod/Eovaldi/Perez/Pivetta/Houck(Sale)

RP: Colome, Barnes, Brasier, Hernandez, Taylor, Whitlock, Andriese, Suero (Brice? Eventually Houck?)

 

1B: Dalbec

2b: Hernandez

3b: Devers

SS: Bogerts

LF: Benintendi (Renfroe)

CF: Bradley/Pillar/Almora/Marisnick

RF: Verdugo

DH: Martinez

C: Vazquez

 

BN: Plawecki

BN: Arroyo

BN: Renfroe

BN: ? (Chavis? Moreland? Miller?)

 

 

I would not think this team would come in last again. But is it an 85-90 win team?

Edited by notin
Posted
We also heard they had interest in Garrett Richards.

 

Can we stay under the limit by signing Odorizzi, Richards, Colome, Pillar & Kike? (maybe by trading Beni for a cheap RP'er or OF'er?)

Posted
We also heard they had interest in Garrett Richards.

 

As a closer, I would be OK with that. But for a team with health issues atop the rotation, Richards represents another problem, not a solution...

Posted
As a closer, I would be OK with that. But for a team with health issues atop the rotation, Richards represents another problem, not a solution...

 

You are fond of that line, and get to use it a lot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...