Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • moonslav59

    2143

  • mvp 78

    1876

  • notin

    1647

  • Bellhorn04

    1162

Posted
What about deal like Castillo or Luzardo- pitchers with 3 or more years on control?

 

 

I don’t see why the Mariners would be so willing to move the Castillo. Now if you want Robbie Ray, he can be had for a song. And not even a good song. “Pictures of Matchstick Men” might be enough…

Posted
only if they come cheap

 

I'm not for trading for either, unless it is part of a larger plan to get better in 2024.

 

I'd be fine trading a lot for Luzardo, if we signed Monty and added Polanco.

 

BTV is a flawed site, and trying for a 3 players for one type deal is very likely a pipe dream, but what would you offer in the ballpark of these valued pitchers:

 

63 Luzardo (3 yrs for a total of an estimated $28M)

58 Garrett (5 yrs at $46M)

17 Castillo (5 yrs at $122M or $24.5M/yr)

 

Sox values:

51 Casas

48 Bello

45 Mayer

42 Anthony

34 Duran

24 Crawford

22 Houck

22 Bleis

18 Teel

13 Yorke

12 Rafaela

10 Schreiber

9 Wink & Pivetta

8 EValdez & Abreu

7 Cespedes

6 Wikelman

 

Duran, Crawford and Wikelman for Luzardo (That's the 3 for 1 I warned against working)

 

Mayer and Bleis for Luzardo?

Mayer & Houck or Crawford?

 

How about Mayer & Yorke for Garrett?

Mayer & Rafaela?

 

How about Crawford or Houck for Castillo and $5M?

Yorke and Schreiber for the same?

 

I'm not sure any of these offers would be accepted, but you get the general idea.

 

Posted
I don’t see why the Mariners would be so willing to move the Castillo. Now if you want Robbie Ray, he can be had for a song. And not even a good song. “Pictures of Matchstick Men” might be enough…

 

They are reportedly looking to cut salary and have a glut of SP'ers, but I agree. I doubt they want to trade him.

 

They'd have to really like one or two of our prospects to think about it.

Posted
Red Sox front office is catatonic, frozen in place, as if in a Twilight Zone episode.

 

My favorite was "The Hunt" where some old-timer and his loyal dog hike through the afterlife (the raccoon won) looking for a place where they're welcome. The guy wisely stayed away from the gate where fake St. Pete refused his dog entry.

 

They finally reach the real heaven, where a World Series isn't guaranteed every year, but the front office is actually sincere about building a roster for sustained contention...

Posted
My favorite was "The Hunt" where some old-timer and his loyal dog hike through the afterlife (the raccoon won) looking for a place where they're welcome. The guy wisely stayed away from the gate where fake St. Pete refused his dog entry.

 

They finally reach the real heaven, where a World Series isn't guaranteed every year, but the front office is actually sincere about building a roster for sustained contention...

 

A heavenly dream it was.

Posted
My favorite was "The Hunt" where some old-timer and his loyal dog hike through the afterlife (the raccoon won) looking for a place where they're welcome. The guy wisely stayed away from the gate where fake St. Pete refused his dog entry.

 

They finally reach the real heaven, where a World Series isn't guaranteed every year, but the front office is actually sincere about building a roster for sustained contention...

 

 

That old timer was the incredibly awesome Arthur Hunnicutt, who also appeared in such classics as “El Dorado” and “Cat Ballou.” In the latter, he played an aging Butch Cassidy.

 

Hunnicutt’s best talent, besides his non-stop rambling of nonsensical metaphors, was looking 80 while in his 40s. He was only in his mid-fifties for that Twilight Zone episode. (I believe he appeared in another episode of that show as well.)

Posted
That old timer was the incredibly awesome Arthur Hunnicutt, who also appeared in such classics as “El Dorado” and “Cat Ballou.” In the latter, he played an aging Butch Cassidy.

 

Hunnicutt’s best talent, besides his non-stop rambling of nonsensical metaphors, was looking 80 while in his 40s. He was only in his mid-fifties for that Twilight Zone episode. (I believe he appeared in another episode of that show as well.)

 

Damn, I knew it.

 

Back in the day, mid-50s was the old 70s. I was looking in my 40s in the 80s.

Posted
If you redo that offseason and spend the Hanley/Pablo money differently:

SP Ervin Santana

SP AJ Burnett (don't sign Masterson either)

3B Chase Headley

OF Nelson Cruz

 

Yeah. Ramirez and Sandoval were near the top of most of the FA Rankings ... Sandoval's utter collapse in particular was hard to predict. I was worried it would not be a good value, but I thought he would be a functional big leaguer.

Posted
I don’t see why the Mariners would be so willing to move the Castillo. Now if you want Robbie Ray, he can be had for a song. And not even a good song. “Pictures of Matchstick Men” might be enough…

Free agents pitchers find Seattle more attractive than free agent hitters so.

 

The Mariners would likely trade Luis Castiilo only for a prearb impact bat to free up payroll to sign a free agent pitcher. Think an interesting trade centered on Cincinnati third baseman Noelvi Marte.

 

BTW Castillo's contract, which has a no-trade clause, guarantees just $91 million over four years with a $25 million vesting option for as fifth year.

Posted

Some post mortem on Yamamoto:

 

-It seems that "the fix was in" to a certain extent in that he wanted to play for the Dodgers from the start. He took the Mets offer of 12/325 to LA, they matched it, and the Mets weren't given a chance to increase their offer.

-Article in the Boston Herald about the Sox and Yamamoto suggests they were willing to exceed what they paid Price and that was about it. Which would leave them roughly $100 million short.

Posted
Red Sox with Reported Interest in Teoscar Hernandez.

 

A guy worth discussing.

 

My first reaction was comparing him to righty power hitters the Sox once recruited like Jack Clark or Andre Dawson, when they were cooked. But Teoscar is only 31 (Clark and Dawson were still stars at 31, back when 31 was older than it is now, with modern training/arthoscopy/nutrition).

 

Teoscar is a two-time Silver Slugger whose Similar Batters on bb-ref include ex-Red Sox Tony Conigliaro, Hunter Renfroe and Yoenis Cespedes. And THern hasn't had the pleasure of hitting in Fenway Park for 81 games a season.

 

See how optimistic a poster can be in the dread of winter?

Posted
A guy worth discussing.

 

My first reaction was comparing him to righty power hitters the Sox once recruited like Jack Clark or Andre Dawson, when they were cooked. But Teoscar is only 31 (Clark and Dawson were still stars at 31, back when 31 was older than it is now, with modern training/arthoscopy/nutrition).

 

Teoscar is a two-time Silver Slugger whose Similar Batters on bb-ref include ex-Red Sox Tony Conigliaro, Hunter Renfroe and Yoenis Cespedes. And THern hasn't had the pleasure of hitting in Fenway Park for 81 games a season.

 

See how optimistic a poster can be in the dread of winter?

 

Can he pitch?

Posted
Red Sox with Reported Interest in Teoscar Hernandez.

 

Perfect!!

 

Another corner OF who can’t field and is coming off a season where he has a lower OPS+ than Masataka Yoshida!

Posted
Perfect!!

 

Another corner OF who can’t field and is coming off a season where he has a lower OPS+ than Masataka Yoshida!

 

Checks all the boxes!

Posted
We need to let it sink in that the Sox were NOT serious players for Moto.

 

So what exactly are they in on?

 

I told you that all along.

 

Granted, I said the Mets were. But most important was the Sox weren’t.

 

That leaves Snell, Montgomery, Giolito, Stroman, Montas, Clevinger. And the longshot of long shots - Brad Keller (included because of Breslow’s reported interest in hard-throwing pitchers, which Keller certainly is.)

 

 

Still some trade market options as well…

Posted
I told you that all along.

 

Granted, I said the Mets were. But most important was the Sox weren’t.

 

That leaves Snell, Montgomery, Giolito, Stroman, Montas, Clevinger. And the longshot of long shots - Brad Keller (included because of Breslow’s reported interest in hard-throwing pitchers, which Keller certainly is.)

 

 

Still some trade market options as well…

 

I think Snell is clearly out, especially with the lost draft pick.

 

I also have a lot of doubt they're willing to pay Montgomery's price.

 

It's so close to making more sense to punt.

 

But I'm sure they will make a move or two to at least give the appearance they're trying to do something.

Posted
I think Snell is clearly out, especially with the lost draft pick.

 

I also have a lot of doubt they're willing to pay Montgomery's price.

 

It's so close to making more sense to punt.

 

But I'm sure they will make a move or two to at least give the appearance they're trying to do something.

 

So why was Bloom fired at all?

 

And stop being unobservanr and unimaginative. It’s been pointed out HUNDREDS of times free agency is the worst place ti get pitching. Short term deals? Sure. But game-changing players? I’ve asked dozens of times the last time one of those deals worked out for Boston. And really, no good answer.

 

Now the trade market is a different story. Sale, Schilling and Pedro headline that list. And I know a lot of fans would prefer a free agent and keep the prospects, as free agents cost “only money”, but that’s because we’re all not thinking like team owners. We’re thinking like poor people. They’re thinking like billionaires. Prospects and money are two methods of acquiring new players, but in general, owners like to keep the money. Largely because, unlike prospects, everyone accepts it. They can’t go to the Lamborghini dealer and, when he asks how will you be paying, respond in good faith with “will you accept an 18yo Baseball America top 100 shortstop prospect and a 22yo MLB-ready starting pitcher?”

 

It turns out, Italian sports car dealers are not so into prospects.

 

Breslow been talking trade market all along, rarely mentioning free agent pitchers. I expect more along that line…

Posted
So why was Bloom fired at all?

 

And stop being unobservanr and unimaginative. It’s been pointed out HUNDREDS of times free agency is the worst place ti get pitching. Short term deals? Sure. But game-changing players? I’ve asked dozens of times the last time one of those deals worked out for Boston. And really, no good answer.

 

It's not the right question.

 

The question is how do they work out in general. The results are obviously mixed, but there are successful ones.

 

I will submit that Lackey was a good signing. He contributed to a title and when he was healthy he pitched well. We were better off with him than without him.

Posted
It's not the right question.

 

The question is how do they work out in general. The results are obviously mixed, but there are successful ones.

 

I will submit that Lackey was a good signing. He contributed to a title and when he was healthy he pitched well. We were better off with him than without him.

 

Take a look at Lackey's WAR and his dollar values on FanGraphs.

 

It's a myth that it wasn't a good signing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...