Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Much like the Redskins, the Cleveland Guardians are considering a name change. What are some thoughts on a new name for an MLB franchise that represents the city of Cleveland?

 

Their minor league hockey team used to go by the Lake Erie Monsters, which was an incredible name. But they changed it to Cleveland Monsters, which just made it lame. It also hurts that the Angels just wasted one of the best monikers ever - Trash Pandas - on a minor league franchise.

 

Any thoughts on a new name for a Cleveland MLB franchise?

Posted
Erie's

 

Nope, that was the name of an Indian group wiped out by the Iroquois in the mid 1600s.

 

Wasn't there a NL team in Cleveland late in the 19th century called the Spiders?

Community Moderator
Posted
I was thinking the same thing.

 

I think they might as well change them all and get it over with, rather than drag out the process.

Posted
I think they might as well change them all and get it over with, rather than drag out the process.

 

But then where does it end? Chiefs and Braves would presumably be next, and then you can start to go crazy with it. For example, the original Patriots during the Revolutionary War were all white, so does the name Patriots promote white supremacy?

 

That's as non-political as I can be

Posted
Many towns or areas are named after various Indian tribes . This is intended as a compliment , not at all derogatory . The Florida State football team is nicknamed " Seminoles " , without any complaint from the Seminole tribe in Florida. Certainly , " Redskins " can be offensive and should be changed , but is there really a need to change everything ?
Posted
Many towns or areas are named after various Indian tribes . This is intended as a compliment , not at all derogatory . The Florida State football team is nicknamed " Seminoles " , without any complaint from the Seminole tribe in Florida. Certainly , " Redskins " can be offensive and should be changed , but is there really a need to change everything ?

 

Within the last couple years, my high school recently had to change Sachems. I don't think that is a derogatory term either

Posted
How about the Cleveland Galehouses ? If it wasn't for the late , great Denny Galehouse , they would be " celebrating " a 100 year championship drought this season . You are welcome , Cleveland .
Old-Timey Member
Posted
I think they might as well change them all and get it over with, rather than drag out the process.

 

People can find a reason to be offended about anything though. I'm not sure if it's possible to get it over with quickly.

Community Moderator
Posted
People can find a reason to be offended about anything though. I'm not sure if it's possible to get it over with quickly.

 

Redskins, Chiefs, Guardians, Braves - these are all pretty much at the same level, IMHO.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Redskins, Chiefs, Guardians, Braves - these are all pretty much at the same level, IMHO.

 

Redskins I understand. I don't understand what is offensive about the others. Forgive my ignorance.

Community Moderator
Posted
Redskins I understand. I don't understand what is offensive about the others. Forgive my ignorance.

 

I know what you're saying. But if indigenous people find them offensive I accept it.

Community Moderator
Posted
Maybe 'Guardians' and 'Braves' are not so offensive in themselves, but these two franchises have done plenty to emphasize all the obviously offensive stereotypes that can be associated with the names - "Chief Wahoo", "Chief Noc-a-homa", the "Tomahawk Chop", etc.
Community Moderator
Posted
Redskins I understand. I don't understand what is offensive about the others. Forgive my ignorance.

 

For starters, they aren’t “Guardians.”

Community Moderator
Posted
Maybe 'Guardians' and 'Braves' are not so offensive in themselves, but these two franchises have done plenty to emphasize all the obviously offensive stereotypes that can be associated with the names - "Chief Wahoo", "Chief Noc-a-homa", the "Tomahawk Chop", etc.

 

Wahoo should have been gone decades ago. Braves got rid of Noc-a-homa a few years ago I believe.

Posted
To make things easier all Cleveland franchises should be called the Browns

 

Someone would find that racist, even though it's after Paul Brown

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Maybe 'Guardians' and 'Braves' are not so offensive in themselves, but these two franchises have done plenty to emphasize all the obviously offensive stereotypes that can be associated with the names - "Chief Wahoo", "Chief Noc-a-homa", the "Tomahawk Chop", etc.

 

Another fair point. Can they change their logos, etc., without changing their names?

Posted
I know what you're saying. But if indigenous people find them offensive I accept it.

 

I can understand their positions, and whn you look at the Indian's logo, I'd be offended, too.

 

The Redskins logo has always looked distinguished, to me, but yeah, the name is a clear no-no.

 

Chiefs and Braves seem kind of neutral, but I can see how their names are being used to instill thoughts of brave warriors in battle, and that's a stereotype they feel has been overused for long enough.

 

My guess is, with all that is going on now, these names will be changed within a year or two.

 

Hell, the Lincoln Memorial may be next, after all, he did sign off on the biggest gov't sanctioned lynching of Native Americans in US history.

 

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/300-santee-sioux-sentenced-to-hang-in-minnesota

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...