Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 last places in 4 years. Henry signed off on DD hire. He's the best owner we've had. I trust his judgement.

 

Henry signed off on Dombrowski to replace Lucchino, not Cherington. Dombrowski was reportedly caught offguard by Cherinton's resignation...

  • Replies 744
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Henry signed off on Dombrowski to replace Lucchino, not Cherington. Dombrowski was reportedly caught offguard by Cherinton's resignation...

 

^^^

 

I see Dombrowski more favorably than Lucchino.

Posted
^^^

 

I see Dombrowski more favorably than Lucchino.

 

Most people see a fire-breathing velociraptor holding a fistful of eviction notices as a favorable alternative to Lucchino...

Posted
Henry signed off on Dombrowski to replace Lucchino, not Cherington. Dombrowski was reportedly caught offguard by Cherinton's resignation...

 

But the point was DD became head of baseball operations, supplanting Cherington. Cherington was going to be DD's errand boy.

Posted
It's not just who he traded , but who he kept. He kept Devers , who has turned out to be better than any of those traded . ( Maybe the jury is still out on Moncada )
Posted
Henry signed off on Dombrowski to replace Lucchino, not Cherington. Dombrowski was reportedly caught offguard by Cherinton's resignation...

 

Jeez man, you really put a lot of stock in the official titles. If DD was only replacing Lucchino's function, Ben would not have resigned.

Posted
But the point was DD became head of baseball operations, supplanting Cherington. Cherington was going to be DD's errand boy.

 

Disagree.

Posted
Jeez man, you really put a lot of stock in the official titles. If DD was only replacing Lucchino's function, Ben would not have resigned.

 

Disagree. You guys are just playing into the A700 narrative that Ben was "coffee boy."

Posted
Disagree. You guys are just playing into the A700 narrative that Ben was "coffee boy."

 

Not at all. Why would Ben resign if his position in operations wasn't going to change? Makes no sense.

Posted

Theo Epstein is the president of the Cubs. I don't think there's any doubt he's the head decision-maker in baseball operations.

 

Sam Kennedy is the president of the Red Sox. I don't think there's any doubt Chaim Bloom is the head decision-maker in baseball operations.

Posted
But the point was DD became head of baseball operations, supplanting Cherington. Cherington was going to be DD's errand boy.

 

Is that what Hazen was?

Posted
Theo Epstein is the president of the Cubs. I don't think there's any doubt he's the head decision-maker in baseball operations.

 

Sam Kennedy is the president of the Red Sox. I don't think there's any doubt Chaim Bloom is the head decision-maker in baseball operations.

 

So is Jed Hoyer just a “coffee boy”?

Posted
Jeez man, you really put a lot of stock in the official titles. If DD was only replacing Lucchino's function, Ben would not have resigned.

 

1) Maybe he didn’t like Dombrowski personally. Reportedly it’s not uncommon.

 

2) Possible he suspected that, but that doesn’t mean he was correct.

 

3) Maybe he worked very hard to restore a pretty depleted farm system (while winning a title) that was meant to pipeline players in for years, but knew it would be torn down in front of his eyes when Henry brought in a guy whose very reputation was “Farm Killer”...

Posted
1) Maybe he didn’t like Dombrowski personally. Reportedly it’s not uncommon.

 

2) Possible he suspected that, but that doesn’t mean he was correct.

 

3) Maybe he worked very hard to restore a pretty depleted farm system (while winning a title) that was meant to pipeline players in for years, but knew it would be torn down in front of his eyes when Henry brought in a guy whose very reputation was “Farm Killer”...

 

It all adds up to the fact that he was being 'supplanted', as Nick correctly put it. If you want to argue that it was a case of Ben seeing 'the writing on the wall', that's virtually the same thing.

Posted
So is Jed Hoyer just a “coffee boy”?

 

I never said he was, that's just trying to put words in my mouth.

 

The point is that he's not the head decision-maker.

Posted
It all adds up to the fact that he was being 'supplanted', as Nick correctly put it. If you want to argue that it was a case of Ben seeing 'the writing on the wall', that's virtually the same thing.

 

Even if he was being supplanted, that doesn’t mean the Sox were better off with him going. As I said, DD wanted him to stay, presumably to keep the farm strong...

Posted
I never said he was, that's just trying to put words in my mouth.

 

The point is that he's not the head decision-maker.

 

And every time DD signs a major contract, someone excuses it with “Henry signed off on it.” Doesn’t that mean Dombrowski isn’t either? (And given the number of people who credit Sandoval and/or Hanley with Lucchino, was Ben really ever the head decision maker?)

Posted
3 last places in 4 years. Henry signed off on DD hire. He's the best owner we've had. I trust his judgement.

 

Henry tends to overreact.

 

He should have kept Ben. The 3 last places were not Ben's fault.

Posted
Even if he was being supplanted, that doesn’t mean the Sox were better off with him going. As I said, DD wanted him to stay, presumably to keep the farm strong...

 

The Sox would have been better off if Cherington had stayed under Dombrowski, IMO. That said, I don't blame Cherington one bit for leaving. I would have left under those circumstances.

Posted
The Sox would have been better off if Cherington had stayed under Dombrowski, IMO. That said, I don't blame Cherington one bit for leaving. I would have left under those circumstances.

 

Are we all not saying the same thing? Screw the job titles. DD became head of day to day baseball operations, the job Ben had. I don't blame Ben for leaving.

 

My only point was I tend to think Henry is a good owner and I'll live with his decision making when it comes to hiring of his direct report. I'm assuming head of baseball operations has to answer to the ownership group.

Posted
And every time DD signs a major contract, someone excuses it with “Henry signed off on it.” Doesn’t that mean Dombrowski isn’t either? (And given the number of people who credit Sandoval and/or Hanley with Lucchino, was Ben really ever the head decision maker?)

 

There are likely very few people outside of the most ardent supporters of Ben Cherington who want to blame someone else for the bad decisions that he made while in charge. Lucchino always served as an adequate scapegoat for those who think that they are sure that they know how all of these guys operate.

Posted
Are we all not saying the same thing? Screw the job titles. DD became head of day to day baseball operations, the job Ben had. I don't blame Ben for leaving.

 

My only point was I tend to think Henry is a good owner and I'll live with his decision making when it comes to hiring of his direct report. I'm assuming head of baseball operations has to answer to the ownership group.

No.

 

On August 1, 2015, the Red Sox announced that Lucchino was stepping down after the 2015 season.

 

Dombo was hired two weeks later to take over for Larry. Are you saying that Ben left because of 2 weeks believing he’d be president of baseball ops?

Posted
And every time DD signs a major contract, someone excuses it with “Henry signed off on it.” Doesn’t that mean Dombrowski isn’t either? (And given the number of people who credit Sandoval and/or Hanley with Lucchino, was Ben really ever the head decision maker?)

 

I don't think that's true. Most people hold DD responsible for Price, Sale, and Eovaldi.

 

And the stuff about Lucchino being responsible for Sandoval and/or Hanley is all speculation.

Posted
No.

 

On August 1, 2015, the Red Sox announced that Lucchino was stepping down after the 2015 season.

 

Dombo was hired two weeks later to take over for Larry. Are you saying that Ben left because of 2 weeks believing he’d be president of baseball ops?

 

It's totally implausible that Dombo was only hired to do what Larry had been doing (whatever that was). Dombo has always been a head decision-maker. It only makes sense that Henry wanted DD to assume that responsibility with the Red Sox, and that's exactly the way it unfolded.

 

Ben realized he was no longer going to be that guy, and he resigned.

Posted
I don't think that's true. Most people hold DD responsible for Price, Sale, and Eovaldi.

 

And the stuff about Lucchino being responsible for Sandoval and/or Hanley is all speculation.

 

I blame Werner for Pablo and Hanley.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...