Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
I wonder if D.Hernandez will get opportunities to pitch in more high leverage situations? With Eovaldi taking over the closer role, will Hernandez eventually take over the 8th inning set up role? Hernandez has dominant stuff, but his walks are concerning.

 

DH has great stuff. that's been his thing though. lack of control and consistency.

Hopefully Eovaldi can help balance things out down there because i really don't see this team making a BIG move unless they're within 4-5 games by the deadline.

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
The Red Sox bullpen can be pretty good with Eovaldi taking over as the closer. Workman has earned the 8th inning role (main set up guy). That would leave Barnes, Hernandez, Walden, as the 6th/7th inning relievers. If the Red Sox do acquire a relief pitcher, I would think that Brewer is sent down. Taylor has moved in front of him IMO and Hembree is out of options.
Posted
The Red Sox bullpen can be pretty good with Eovaldi taking over as the closer. Workman has earned the 8th inning role (main set up guy). That would leave Barnes, Hernandez, Walden, as the 6th/7th inning relievers. If the Red Sox do acquire a relief pitcher, I would think that Brewer is sent down. Taylor has moved in front of him IMO and Hembree is out of options.

 

Key word is "can."

 

I've always liked Barnes, but I'm not so sure he bounces back. Walden has had a short comeback after a tough stretch, but I don't see him as a guy I want in the 7th or 8th inning of a playoff game.

 

Hembree was doing well before the injury and looks awful, now. Brewer was doing okay for a stretch, but not now.

 

Last 28 days (listed by most IP):

 

2.13 Taylor (12.2 IP) Looking great, but would anyone be surprised, if he implodes?

3.72 Workman (9.2) Our most consistently good RP'er all year, but is largely a surprise.

5.79 Brewer (9.1) Not my idea of a solid RP'er.

9.00 Walden (7.0) Has made an improvement, of late.

10.29 Brasier (7.0) Not even doing well at AAA.

4.50 Barnes (6.0) Something going on with Matt.

9.00 Hembree (6.0) Not good since return.

0.00 Hernandez (4.) Needs a larger sample size to convince me he is "solid."

 

 

 

 

Posted
The Red Sox bullpen can be pretty good with Eovaldi taking over as the closer. Workman has earned the 8th inning role (main set up guy). That would leave Barnes, Hernandez, Walden, as the 6th/7th inning relievers. If the Red Sox do acquire a relief pitcher, I would think that Brewer is sent down. Taylor has moved in front of him IMO and Hembree is out of options.

ZiPS, Steamer and FanGraphs Depth Chart project Nathan Eovaldi with rest-of-season ERA of 4.43, 3.38 and 3.91, as well of rest-of-season BAA of .281, .237 and .263:

 

https://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=9132&position=P

 

Eovaldi comes with risks.

Posted
ZiPS, Steamer and FanGraphs Depth Chart project Nathan Eovaldi with rest-of-season ERA of 4.43, 3.38 and 3.91, as well of rest-of-season BAA of .281, .237 and .263:

 

https://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=9132&position=P

 

Eovaldi comes with risks.

 

So many do. Just look at that closer the Mets acquired from the Mariners this offseason. After the 2018 season he had, what could possibly go wrong for the Mets on that one?

Posted
Hembree was doing well before the injury and looks awful, now.

 

He looked completely lost the other night against the Yankees. If the Red Sox acquire a RP, I suppose they could put Hembree back on the IL and then send him out on a rehab stint when he returns. He looks like he needs it.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
ZiPS, Steamer and FanGraphs Depth Chart project Nathan Eovaldi with rest-of-season ERA of 4.43, 3.38 and 3.91, as well of rest-of-season BAA of .281, .237 and .263:

 

https://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=9132&position=P

 

Eovaldi comes with risks.

 

Yahoo fantasy baseball is forecasting 44.5 saves for Eovaldi for the remainder of the season (which is 57 games).

 

I’m taking the under on that one...

Posted
Three weeks ago , Hembree was being touted as the next closer . Now , he is on the outs . And so it goes . I will say it once more : Eovaldi closing can stabilize the bullpen . Guys like Workman , Barnes , possibly Hernandez and the rest can settle into their setup roles . That is how a bullpen should operate . All season long , it has been too uncertain . Too much playing it by ear . Not good .
Posted
So many do. Just look at that closer the Mets acquired from the Mariners this offseason. After the 2018 season he had, what could possibly go wrong for the Mets on that one?

And Edwin Diaz had a career ERA+ of 156 at the time of the trade as opposed to Nathan Eovaldi's career ERA+ of 95.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
23 saves and 22 blown saves. Whether it's fully deserved or not, the bullpen is racking up some horrid numbers in saves and save %.
Posted
23 saves and 22 blown saves. Whether it's fully deserved or not, the bullpen is racking up some horrid numbers in saves and save %.

 

The starter did great, today, too!

Posted
Three weeks ago , Hembree was being touted as the next closer . Now , he is on the outs . And so it goes . I will say it once more : Eovaldi closing can stabilize the bullpen . Guys like Workman , Barnes , possibly Hernandez and the rest can settle into their setup roles . That is how a bullpen should operate . All season long , it has been too uncertain . Too much playing it by ear . Not good .

 

Hembree did have an injury that may have been part of the reason why he went from having a good start to the year to poofdom.

Posted
Hembree did have an injury that may have been part of the reason why he went from having a good start to the year to poofdom.

 

Hembree and Barnes both seem to get flustered when under pressure. Better to find replacements for them going forward.

Posted
Honest question (sorry if this has been answered before) has any other bullpen been used more than the Sox?? I swear they are playing more than the starters this year, it’s insane.
Posted

Can we remember one thing?

 

Today's SP: 1.2 IP 3 ER (8 H+BB)

 

Today's pen: 8.1 IP 2 ER (8H + BB)

 

I'm tired of these loses being blamed on the pen.

 

Posted
Can we remember one thing?

 

Today's SP: 1.2 IP 3 ER (8 H+BB)

 

Today's pen: 8.1 IP 2 ER (8H + BB)

 

I'm tired of these loses being blamed on the pen.

 

The bullpen stinks. I am glad that it makes you happy that the starters stink too. Cashner can be thrown in the Dumpster on October 1st or sooner imo. Porcello should be given a cake and a big goodbye card. He has had 3 atrocious seasons, 1 meh season and 1 stellar season. I don't expect that he will improve. For $22.5 million/yr, DD can do better.
Posted
The bullpen stinks. I am glad that it makes you happy that the starters stink too. Cashner can be thrown in the Dumpster on October 1st or sooner imo. Porcello should be given a cake and a big goodbye card. He has had 3 atrocious seasons, 1 meh season and 1 stellar season. I don't expect that he will improve. For $22.5 million/yr, DD can do better.

 

Don't be a dick.

 

I'm pissed at hell about the starters and the pen.

 

Our team sucks. There's nothing to be "happy" about.

 

I guess I should begin to think like you and wonder, if you find joy in the pen blowing another save, since it make you look right. Only a warped mind would think like this.

 

(I'm not sure what Porcello has to do with any of this. He's a starter, and he sucks.)

Posted
Don't be a dick.

 

I'm pissed at hell about the starters and the pen.

 

Our team sucks. There's nothing to be "happy" about.

 

I guess I should begin to think like you and wonder, if you find joy in the pen blowing another save, since it make you look right. Only a warped mind would think like this.

 

(I'm not sure what Porcello has to do with any of this. He's a starter, and he sucks.)

I didn't see that anyone was blaming the pen for today's loss. Cashener got booed off the mound. I thought your post was dick-ish.
Posted

 

(I'm not sure what Porcello has to do with any of this. He's a starter, and he sucks.)

Yeah, we agree on that. I never said anything different about him.
Posted
Honest question (sorry if this has been answered before) has any other bullpen been used more than the Sox?? I swear they are playing more than the starters this year, it’s insane.

 

And we have a winner!!!

 

The Red Sox do lead the American League with 419 bullpen appearances (and that’s before adding another half dozen today).

 

And yet they are 7th in innings from the pen - and last in the AL East. (Opener strategies do impact here.) That might say something since it probably also means the Sox are at or near the bottom of the league in bullpen IP/Appearance. Maybe because they aren’t dry effective? Or is Cora too overeactive?

Posted
And we have a winner!!!

 

The Red Sox do lead the American League with 419 bullpen appearances (and that’s before adding another half dozen today).

 

And yet they are 7th in innings from the pen - and last in the AL East. (Opener strategies do impact here.) That might say something since it probably also means the Sox are at or near the bottom of the league in bullpen IP/Appearance. Maybe because they aren’t dry effective? Or is Cora too overeactive?

 

Its not really Cora. He is stuck dealing with the sludge that passes for MLB quality pitching these days and that is really all it is. As fans we simply have not come to terms with how bad pitching is generally across MLB. We keep comparing these clowns to each other without realizing that its a formula that does not work any longer because they are basically with few exceptions all a buncha' double AA quality pitchers at best. Who cares anymore that this guy's ERA is X and this other guy's ERA is Y. We are comparing a bum to a hobo and somehow trying to build an argument for the bum vs the hobo.

 

The final coup de grace for the whole bunch of them impersonating MLB pitchers is the new 2019 Manfred Missile. The 2016 version was not good enough for our boy Rob. Noooooooo....and the 2018 version was not good enough for him either.

 

Whatever low level of actual pitching talent they have has been scared right out of them by a baseball that any two bit punk could knock over the wall just by barely touching it.

 

So welcome to Manfred League Baseball. Hope you like it. Anybody with an eye for baseball talent not completely attached to a spread sheet should have seen this coming years ago.

Posted
And we have a winner!!!

 

The Red Sox do lead the American League with 419 bullpen appearances (and that’s before adding another half dozen today).

 

And yet they are 7th in innings from the pen - and last in the AL East. (Opener strategies do impact here.) That might say something since it probably also means the Sox are at or near the bottom of the league in bullpen IP/Appearance. Maybe because they aren’t dry effective? Or is Cora too overeactive?

 

I think Cora has managed this pen about as well as he could.

Posted
Its not really Cora. He is stuck dealing with the sludge that passes for MLB quality pitching these days and that is really all it is. As fans we simply have not come to terms with how bad pitching is generally across MLB. We keep comparing these clowns to each other without realizing that its a formula that does not work any longer because they are basically with few exceptions all a buncha' double AA quality pitchers at best. Who cares anymore that this guy's ERA is X and this other guy's ERA is Y. We are comparing a bum to a hobo and somehow trying to build an argument for the bum vs the hobo.

 

The final coup de grace for the whole bunch of them impersonating MLB pitchers is the new 2019 Manfred Missile. The 2016 version was not good enough for our boy Rob. Noooooooo....and the 2018 version was not good enough for him either.

 

Whatever low level of actual pitching talent they have has been scared right out of them by a baseball that any two bit punk could knock over the wall just by barely touching it.

 

So welcome to Manfred League Baseball. Hope you like it. Anybody with an eye for baseball talent not completely attached to a spread sheet should have seen this coming years ago.

 

I'm not sure the pitching is any worse than 1, 2, 5, 10 or 15 years ago. I'm not sure how those guys would have done with the juiced ball and smaller ball parks.

Posted
I'm not sure the pitching is any worse than 1, 2, 5, 10 or 15 years ago. I'm not sure how those guys would have done with the juiced ball and smaller ball parks.

 

I agree. It's not really fair to say on one hand that the ball is now a missile and on the other hand the pitching is now worse.

Posted
I agree. It's not really fair to say on one hand that the ball is now a missile and on the other hand the pitching is now worse.

 

I guess it's hard to now, and that's why I hate these kind of changes to the game, especially made in secret.

 

They ruin the integrity of the game and its history.

 

It could be a little of both, but how can we ever know.

Posted
I agree. It's not really fair to say on one hand that the ball is now a missile and on the other hand the pitching is now worse.

 

The pitching was getting worse Waaaaaaaaaaaay before the first Manfred Missile. The Manfred Missiles (now plural) just exacerbated an already existing condition.

 

The pitching was certainly better in the 1990's and before, better in at least the first 5 to maybe 10 years of this century. Baseball prides itself on its statistical records that go back a long long way. Going back 10 years, even 15 years is just dodging the issue.

 

The pitching sucks and much like any frame of reference you want to talk about realistically, once a performance standard falls to a very low level it cascades from there. It will hockey stick at some point. No performance standard remains steady state either in advance or decline forever. Eventually it will cascade either way whether it a business performance standard or anything else you want to measure over time.

 

There is no question but that the Manfred Missile has exacerbated that cascade even further but that is all it has done. The "Missile" is the coup de grace and not more than that.

Posted
I guess it's hard to now, and that's why I hate these kind of changes to the game, especially made in secret.

 

They ruin the integrity of the game and its history.

 

It could be a little of both, but how can we ever know.

 

I'm not sure the game really ever had any integrity. Deadball, racism, gambling, greenies, steroids, high pitchers mounds, juiced balls... Did I miss anything? That is the nature of all sports. What keeps me from giving up on it is the drama of it all. You can't predict the outcome. Unless it is all fixed, which I don't really think it is.

Posted
The pitching was getting worse Waaaaaaaaaaaay before the first Manfred Missile. The Manfred Missiles (now plural) just exacerbated an already existing condition.

 

The pitching was certainly better in the 1990's and before, better in at least the first 5 to maybe 10 years of this century. Baseball prides itself on its statistical records that go back a long long way. Going back 10 years, even 15 years is just dodging the issue.

 

The pitching sucks and much like any frame of reference you want to talk about realistically, once a performance standard falls to a very low level it cascades from there. It will hockey stick at some point. No performance standard remains steady state either in advance or decline forever. Eventually it will cascade either way whether it a business performance standard or anything else you want to measure over time.

 

There is no question but that the Manfred Missile has exacerbated that cascade even further but that is all it has done. The "Missile" is the coup de grace and not more than that.

 

personally i dont think the pitching has dropped off that much. i think the hitting preparation has gotten better. video / training / pitcher tendencies / harder bats. plus the unwritten rules have changed. pitchers can no longer light it up inside willy nilly. thank the insanely high priced salaries players get for that one.....

Posted
the best way to fix the hitting / pitching is to have robot umps. pitchers getting all 17" width + knee to letters would move the needle for sure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...