Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Spud, this kid sounds like a generational talent

 

Well in that case most big market teams will be going balls to the walls for this kid. Even all the other teams have a crack at him.

 

I guess I have not read as much about him as I should.

 

Overall, I'm not a proponent of chasing every new beaner-de jour. The fact that he is from Cuba has me suspecting two things about him.

 

One, I bet no team has seen anywhere near enough of him playing the game to make an accurate assessment. The Sox, as an example, had not seen Castillo play much over the 2 years prior to his signing.

 

Two, he is probably very raw in skill development. He comes from a desperately poor country where facilities are few. At 19 he probably has not played much high level ball.

I bet he is over rated.

Posted
If Yankees are really interested in signing him, I can't see him becoming anything other than an improvement to that horrific middle infield.

 

Not sure you can really call it horrific. If anything, it is going to be a massive defensive improvement over last year. No idea what kind of offense we'll get with Drew having a full preseason and Gregorius moving to a good park for lefties. It certainly has the potential to be an offensive black hole, but far from a sure thing

Posted
Wade Miley has signed a 3 year, $19.25 mil extension, thus avoiding arbitration.

 

Seems reasonable. Especially if he does not suck.

 

And I do not believe that he will suck.

 

That job belongs to laptop.

Posted
Seems reasonable. Especially if he does not suck.

 

And I do not believe that he will suck.

 

That job belongs to laptop.

 

He doesn't throw hard and he doesn't have good secondary pitches. He will have to be very fine to be successful.

Posted
He doesn't throw hard and he doesn't have good secondary pitches. He will have to be very fine to be successful.

 

Wade Miley sits 91-93, which is above-average velocity for lefty, and his best secondary pitch, which is a changeup, grades as plus from both a scouting and analytical perspective. Read a scouting report for once.

Posted
Miley has gotten worse each seasons he has pitched in the majors. His HR rate has risen as has his walk rate in each season. The only good thing is he has seen his K rate jump. Going along with that is his WHIP, rising from 1.18 to 1.32 and last yr at 1.40. This guy walks a fair amount, gives up the longball regularly and gets hit around pretty good. I honestly don't see the draw aside from 200IP.
Posted
Miley has gotten worse each seasons he has pitched in the majors. His HR rate has risen as has his walk rate in each season. The only good thing is he has seen his K rate jump. Going along with that is his WHIP, rising from 1.18 to 1.32 and last yr at 1.40. This guy walks a fair amount, gives up the longball regularly and gets hit around pretty good. I honestly don't see the draw aside from 200IP.

Plus, he will not get an easy out each time around the lineup. We gave up a better pitcher than him in Arroyo after 2005.

Posted
Miley has gotten worse each seasons he has pitched in the majors. His HR rate has risen as has his walk rate in each season. The only good thing is he has seen his K rate jump. Going along with that is his WHIP, rising from 1.18 to 1.32 and last yr at 1.40. This guy walks a fair amount, gives up the longball regularly and gets hit around pretty good. I honestly don't see the draw aside from 200IP.

 

The longball is a legitimate problem. But a GB pitcher playing behind a s***** D in a park that accentuates his weaknesses is a recipe for disaster. I noticed you conveniently leave out his FIP and xFIP, which are much higher on his body of work. There's plenty of room for improvement moving to a better park (yes, Fenway is a better park than Chase in this particular case) with better D, and in a timeframe where offense in the AL just ain't what it used to be.

Posted (edited)
I do not see in Miley anything better than a 4.0 ERA pitcher going forward. In fact I do not see any of this staff below 4.0 with at least 190 IP. Edited by iortiz
Posted
I do not see in Miley anything better than a 4.0 ERA pitcher going forward. In fact I do not see any of this staff below 4.0 with at least 190 IP.

 

Miley is an excellent bet to deliver 200 average innings which is valuable in itself.

Posted
Miley must think that he got a great deal. The Red Sox think that they got a great deal. Something troubles me about that. I'm not sure I know what it is. 200 innings is important for sure. At what level? If it works out the way the Red Sox hope the deal works out it will turn out to be a very good deal. He is under contract and that is good I hope. Unlike Kelly, he isn't predicting a Cy Young year anytime soon either.
Posted
Miley is an excellent bet to deliver 200 average innings which is valuable in itself.

 

Yup, but I meant the combination. 4.0- AND 200 IP. In other words, if he posts 200 IP I do not see him below 4.0. Probably Kelly posts something below 4.0 but I do not see him posting it at 190+ IP.

Posted
Miley is an excellent bet to deliver 200 average innings which is valuable in itself.
An argument that a bitter Mike Torrez made when cut by the Mets at a time when he had a 5+ ERA. "Where are they going to get someone to pitch 200 innings?" he asked.
Posted (edited)
An argument that a bitter Mike Torrez made when cut by the Mets at a time when he had a 5+ ERA. "Where are they going to get someone to pitch 200 innings?" he asked.

 

Exactly.

 

I do not see Miley, Porcello, Kelly, Buch and Masterson giving us 1000 IP AND posting an average ERA below 4.

Edited by iortiz
Community Moderator
Posted

Only 34 pitchers threw 200 innings last year. Of course they won't get to 1000 IP. That's about 1 per team.

 

Only 66 pitchers had an ERA under 4. Could the staff average 4.00? Maybe? I bet 3 guys are under 4.00 and 2 are over.

Posted
Fair enough but still and as I said, I do not see anybody in our rotation posting an ERA below 4.0 AND 190 IP+.
Posted
Fair enough but still and as I said, I do not see anybody in our rotation posting an ERA below 4.0 AND 190 IP+.

 

That's because you don't like Porcello.

Posted
That's because you don't like Porcello.

 

haha yup. While the ALE pitching is "mediocre" the ALE Lups will destroy him.

Posted
Only 34 pitchers threw 200 innings last year. Of course they won't get to 1000 IP. That's about 1 per team.

 

Only 66 pitchers had an ERA under 4. Could the staff average 4.00? Maybe? I bet 3 guys are under 4.00 and 2 are over.

3 of the current staff under 4 AND at least 200 IP? If so... I propose u a bet, 100 Bucks, what do u say?

Posted
haha yup. While the ALE pitching is "mediocre" the ALE Lups will destroy him.

 

Let's have a reality check on the ALE - it ain't what it used to be.

 

Last year the other 4 teams in the ALE averaged 4.13 runs per game. League average was 4.18.

Posted
3 of the current staff under 4 AND at least 200 IP? If so... I propose u a bet, 100 Bucks, what do u say?

 

Nobody would be dumb enough to take that bet. No team in baseball last year had 3 such pitchers. Only 2 AL teams had 2 such pitchers. You should lower your IP requirement to 180 or the 'qualifying' standard of 162 if you want to have a remotely realistic betting option.

 

If there was an actual betting line on each of the Sox SP over/under 4.00 ERA, with -110 odds, I'd bet 1 unit on Porcello under and Miley over, and 3 units on Kelly and Masterson over, and not touch Buchholz.

Posted
Let's have a reality check on the ALE - it ain't what it used to be.

 

Last year the other 4 teams in the ALE averaged 4.13 runs per game. League average was 4.18.

 

This year I see strong Lups in NY and TOR. In BAL while some players are not anymore, it is still pretty dangerous. TB is the weakest but still could make some damage vs this mediocre rotation.

Posted
Nobody would be dumb enough to take that bet. No team in baseball last year had 3 such pitchers. Only 2 AL teams had 2 such pitchers. You should lower your IP requirement to 180 or the 'qualifying' standard of 162 if you want to have a remotely realistic betting option.

 

If there was an actual betting line on each of the Sox SP over/under 4.00 ERA, with -110 odds, I'd bet 1 unit on Porcello under and Miley over, and 3 units on Kelly and Masterson over, and not touch Buchholz.

Oks. I'm willing to bet at 170 IP. 3 of the current rotation with at least 170 IP and below 4.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...