If I have the time, or more importantly, the mental inclination, I might check out the OPS/RS discrepancy. The correlation between RS and OPS is as close to 1.00 as real life allows. The RS are 17th in OPS and 22nd in RS. It sounds close, but probably the biggest variance in MLB.
Setting aside the prices paid, adding Rutschman and Mead were directionally correct. As we all know, the biggest relative weaknesses (sOPS+) for the RS were:
LF (Anthony)
C (Rutschman)
SS (Story)
2B (Mead)
Story was probably the least reliable of the replacements, but it's difficult to address every weakness.
Past that, I have never denied some bias. I use FG and BR as much as is reasonable, but even hard-core statistics are subject to interpretation.