Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Community Moderator
Posted

 

“He wouldn’t be a passive investor,” said Wharton School Professor of Management Maurice Schweitzer. “It doesn’t make sense for a level playing field to be a part owner of two franchises. It wouldn’t be a good look and it’d set a terrible precedent.”

 

I agree. It probably makes more sense to sell of his stake in the A's. They don't have a great tv deal and are stuck in Oakland due to the Giants owning a considerable portion of the NoCal market. Sox are more profitable. They have their own carve out in New England. Also, the "Fenway Sports Group" is much more than just the Red Sox.

Community Moderator
Posted
One thing I wonder about is what rights teams have to conduct medical exams on their players. It seems like the Red Sox should be entitled to give Nathan's arm a serious exam every offseason, but I don't know if they can.

 

I went through the Health & Safety portion of the CBA and there is nothing that prohibits a team from examining their players. If Eovaldi is getting treatment for a work related injury from a non-affiliated doctor, the treatment must be disclosed to the Sox. There is language about an "annual physical exam" of all players in Spring Training.

 

As for signing a player, a failed physical exam seems to void the contract.

 

My favorite language I found was this:

 

Loyalty

3.(a) The Player agrees to perform his services hereunder diligently

and faithfully, to keep himself in first-class physical condition and to

obey the Club’s training rules, and pledges himself to the American

public and to the Club to conform to high standards of personal conduct, fair play and good sportsmanship.

 

If that's the case, why wasn't Pablo's contract voided? Did his health just not go far enough over the line? Maybe it's just language that really isn't enforceable?

Posted
I went through the Health & Safety portion of the CBA and there is nothing that prohibits a team from examining their players. If Eovaldi is getting treatment for a work related injury from a non-affiliated doctor, the treatment must be disclosed to the Sox. There is language about an "annual physical exam" of all players in Spring Training.

 

As for signing a player, a failed physical exam seems to void the contract.

 

My favorite language I found was this:

 

Loyalty

3.(a) The Player agrees to perform his services hereunder diligently

and faithfully, to keep himself in first-class physical condition and to

obey the Club’s training rules, and pledges himself to the American

public and to the Club to conform to high standards of personal conduct, fair play and good sportsmanship.

 

If that's the case, why wasn't Pablo's contract voided? Did his health just not go far enough over the line? Maybe it's just language that really isn't enforceable?

 

Maybe there's some fine print about pre-existing fatso condition...

Community Moderator
Posted
Maybe there's some fine print about pre-existing fatso condition...

 

Probably covered under Amendment JJ - Big Is Beautiful and Busted Belt Buckles

Posted
Maybe there's some fine print about pre-existing fatso condition...

 

There are plenty of precedents like Rick Reuschel, LaMar Hoyt, John Kruk, Cecil Fielder, Jon Broxton, etc. that you need to get around first...

Community Moderator
Posted
There are plenty of precedents like Rick Reuschel, LaMar Hoyt, John Kruk, Cecil Fielder, Jon Broxton, etc. that you need to get around first...

 

Don't leg Greg Luzinski off the hook here...

Community Moderator
Posted
Maybe it was a misprint or Pablo just misread it as worst-ass physical condition.

 

"Well, they feed me milk and cookies when I fly first class, so those must be allowed!"

Posted
"Well, they feed me milk and cookies when I fly first class, so those must be allowed!"

 

LOL

 

Remember the spring where they had photos of the "trimmer Pablito?"

Posted
Don't leg Greg Luzinski off the hook here...

 

I left off a few precedents, most notably Jumbo Diaz and CC Sabathia...

Posted

The draft started in 1965. Here are the Sox highest picks of all time:

 

3. Mike Garman 1967

4. Ken Brett 1966

4. ________ 2021

5. Billy Conigliaro 1965

7. Trot Nixon 1993

7. Andrew Benintendi 2015

7. Trey Ball 2013

12.Nomar Garciaparra 1994

12. Jason Groome 2016

12. Tom Fischer 1988

12. Jeffrey Everett 1998

 

Posted
SWEET. The two top pitchers go 1 and 2 -- I envision a top position player/bat at 4.

 

We do better drafting bats and signing or trading for aces.

Community Moderator
Posted
SWEET. The two top pitchers go 1 and 2 -- I envision a top position player/bat at 4.

 

We’re also going on rankings based on 2019 scouting. These rankings will drastically change after next spring.

Community Moderator
Posted
We’re also going on rankings based on 2019 scouting. These rankings will drastically change after next spring.

 

For example, Leiter has thrown only 15.2 innings in college.

Posted
As of right now, Baseball Prospectus has the Sox taking LSU RHP Jaden Hill.

 

http://baseballprospectjournal.com/2021-mlb-draft-mock-draft-top-10-picks/

 

Looking around, prospectinsider.com has the Sox taking OF Jud Fabian (U Florida). They have previous pick Hill going 19th. This is also the latest anyone has Fabian going.

 

https://prospectinsider.com/2021-mlb-draft-order-top-prospects-rocker-leiter/

 

 

 

Bleacher Report has UCLA SS Matt McClain going 4th, but they do not impose a team order over their rankings.

 

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2895880-2021-mlb-mock-draft-early-predictions-for-top-1st-round-baseball-prospects

 

 

 

Prospectslive.com has the Sox taking Jack Leiter (RHP Vanderbilt)

 

https://www.prospectslive.com/mlb-draft/2020/9/26/2021-mlb-mock

 

 

 

Prospects365.com has the Sox taking Jack Leiter, but they have the Sox picking 3rd. They have Miami Hurricane C Adrian Del Castillo going 4th

 

https://prospects365.com/2020/09/04/mason-mcraes-2021-mlb-mock-draft-2-0/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...