Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
I remembr checking the odds on this back in the spring, and saw Porcello at 1000-1. What is he now? Odds-On? I never bet sports, so I was doing a general check on RS pitchers. Will we get both AL awards?
  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Kluber, Sale and Porcello will be very close. Fortunately, the Cy vote is usually entirely on individual merit. Kluber is perhaps a tiny bit ahead of the other two - but hard to argue with any.
Posted
Kluber, Sale and Porcello will be very close. Fortunately, the Cy vote is usually entirely on individual merit. Kluber is perhaps a tiny bit ahead of the other two - but hard to argue with any.

 

I'd have to agree that Kluber is ahead of the others by a tad. As you said, though, I really couldn't argue with the others.

Posted
I think Porcello has it locked up. Shouldn't be very much deliberation among the voters.

 

He's certainly deserving, but saying he has it locked up is a bit of a stretch.

Posted
I think Porcello has it locked up. Shouldn't be very much deliberation among the voters.

 

it is possible. voters are not as hypnotized by pitcher wins as they used to be though - and that is a good thing.

Posted
I see Kluber's strikeouts and raise with Porcello's league leading WHIP, which is a much more fundamentally important number.
Posted
I see Kluber's strikeouts and raise with Porcello's league leading WHIP, which is a much more fundamentally important number.

 

not when related to pitcher performance - although it says a lot of team run prevention ... Porcello is the probable choice because pitcher wins can hypnotize. He is also coincidentally entirely worthy.

Posted

Wins should not be a major factor in winning the Cy young award.

 

ERA-

69 Porcello

72 Kluber, Tanaka, A Sanchez

75 Wright, Verlander

76 Sale, Happ

 

WHIP

0.98 Porcello

1.01 Verlander

1.03 Sale

1.05 Kluber

1.08 Tanaka

1.13 Estrada

1.15 Quintana

1.17 Happ

1.18 Price

 

WAR

5.2 Kluber/Sale

4.9 Price

4.7 Porcello/Tanaka

4.6 Quintana

 

Wins (and losses)

21-4 Porcello

17-8 Price

18-9 Kluber

14-4 Tanaka

16-9 Sale

12-11 Quintana

 

Porcello is first in the numbers that mean the most to me: ERA- and WHIP. The 21-4 record seals the deal for me.

 

Posted

I'm not big on K's but the one K stat that matters to me is K/BB ratio:

 

6.0 Porcello

5.7 Tomlin

5.0 Sale

4.8 Price

(Kluber is 9th at 4.0)

 

Posted
Wins should not be a major factor in winning the Cy young award.

 

ERA-

69 Porcello

72 Kluber, Tanaka, A Sanchez

75 Wright, Verlander

76 Sale, Happ

 

WHIP

0.98 Porcello

1.01 Verlander

1.03 Sale

1.05 Kluber

1.08 Tanaka

1.13 Estrada

1.15 Quintana

1.17 Happ

1.18 Price

 

WAR

5.2 Kluber/Sale

4.9 Price

4.7 Porcello/Tanaka

4.6 Quintana

 

Wins (and losses)

21-4 Porcello

17-8 Price

18-9 Kluber

14-4 Tanaka

16-9 Sale

12-11 Quintana

 

Porcello is first in the numbers that mean the most to me: ERA- and WHIP. The 21-4 record seals the deal for me.

 

 

Perfect presentation and most agreeable conclusion, Moon.

 

I have been impressed with Porcello's demeanor while pitching. Cool as a cucumber. Face of a automaton, deals with a dagger.

 

And he walks no one. Hardly. He doesn't have games where he gives up 5 hits and four walks. This is more than I imagined he could be. I thought he would rebound from last season but he's been money since last August.

Posted
I'm not big on K's but the one K stat that matters to me is K/BB ratio:

 

6.0 Porcello

5.7 Tomlin

5.0 Sale

4.8 Price

(Kluber is 9th at 4.0)

 

 

Good numbers all around Moon. Yes K/BB is the way to look at it in this situation. Hes walking less guys and still striking out a lot. Maybe not the most, but the best when compared to how many potential unearned runs hes walking.

They are all deserving and nobody should complain if either of the three win it. My vote is for Porcello.

Posted
Two Ray's off-booth Rat's announcers just ranted about Porcello calling the Cy Young a "sure-thing" for him.
Posted
Wins should not be a major factor in winning the Cy young award.

 

ERA-

69 Porcello

72 Kluber, Tanaka, A Sanchez

75 Wright, Verlander

76 Sale, Happ

 

WHIP

0.98 Porcello

1.01 Verlander

1.03 Sale

1.05 Kluber

1.08 Tanaka

1.13 Estrada

1.15 Quintana

1.17 Happ

1.18 Price

 

WAR

5.2 Kluber/Sale

4.9 Price

4.7 Porcello/Tanaka

4.6 Quintana

 

Wins (and losses)

21-4 Porcello

17-8 Price

18-9 Kluber

14-4 Tanaka

16-9 Sale

12-11 Quintana

 

Porcello is first in the numbers that mean the most to me: ERA- and WHIP. The 21-4 record seals the deal for me.

 

 

Kluber leads in FIP by a solid amount over 2-4. And the strikeouts matter as well. As I noted, Porcello probably wins - and there is no really wrong answer between him, Sale and Kluber.

Posted
Kluber leads in FIP by a solid amount over 2-4. And the strikeouts matter as well. As I noted, Porcello probably wins - and there is no really wrong answer between him, Sale and Kluber.

 

FIP is determined by HR/9, BB/9, and K/9. Porcello wins BB/9, HR/9 is a push, and Kluber wins K/9.

 

FIP doesn't add much light because it is only determined by strikeout numbers in this case.

Posted

Porcello is making a very strong case for Cy Young. He's been our most reliable pitcher this season. And his performance is a huge reason why we're going to win the AL East title.

I think that has to factor into it. Not just the wins but the fact he pretty much carried us on his back for a large part of this season on a division winning club.

Posted
I would say Porcello is a shoe in among starters. There's a few pitchers with similar stats except Porcello has more wins and quality starts and the others have more strikeouts. Wins definitely mean more than strikeouts. Britton definitely has a shot though, a 0.6 ERA and 0 blown saves is pretty impressive.
Posted

I don't think anyone is saying that Porcello is not deserving. I have been one of his biggest supporters since he joined the team and Ben and I would love to see him win the Cy. The race is tight enough that I have no problem with Porcello winning it.

 

If I'm being as objective as possible, however, I have to give it Kluber, by a hair.

 

The voters will likely go with Porcello, mostly because of his 22 Wins.

Posted
FIP is determined by HR/9, BB/9, and K/9. Porcello wins BB/9, HR/9 is a push, and Kluber wins K/9.

 

FIP doesn't add much light because it is only determined by strikeout numbers in this case.

 

Strikeouts are a pitcher accomplishment - fascist as they are ... other outs are on some level team accomplishments. Both guys have "unnatural" BABIPs so they are basically neutral on that front if one tries to infer some "not getting quality contact" from either.

Posted
I would say Porcello is a shoe in among starters. There's a few pitchers with similar stats except Porcello has more wins and quality starts and the others have more strikeouts. Wins definitely mean more than strikeouts. Britton definitely has a shot though, a 0.6 ERA and 0 blown saves is pretty impressive.

 

Britton certainly does. There has never been a closer who has deserved the award - and the years closers have won MVPs are the equivalent to that year Mark Moseley won the NFL MVP.

Posted (edited)
Strikeouts are a pitcher accomplishment - fascist as they are ... other outs are on some level team accomplishments. Both guys have "unnatural" BABIPs so they are basically neutral on that front if one tries to infer some "not getting quality contact" from either.

 

Personally, I'm a "An out is an out" kind of guy myself, but what I'm saying is that while FIP is usually useful... it doesn't really tell us anything in this particular case.

 

Also, with Porcello's recent high strikeout, 1BB/0HR performance, he dropped his FIP from 3.48 to 3.36, so even that is pretty close now.

Edited by Palodios
Posted
Kluber leads in FIP by a solid amount over

2-4. And the strikeouts matter as well. As I noted, Porcello probably wins - and there is no really wrong answer between him, Sale and Kluber.

 

I never get why K's are viewed as highly as WHIP and ERA-. Porcello's last start wasn't as good as most others, but his FIP improves and his ERA- and WHIP got worse.

 

I get why people want a park and defense independent number, but it's just one small piece in the formula for determining who has done the best.

 

Posted
He should with the CY. Britton is good, but his team may miss the playoffs.

 

IMO it's going to be difficult to NOT give the CY to the winningest pitcher in baseball, whose team also wins their division. Not to say that it's going to be impossible but I see it as Porcillo being the odds-on favorite and everyone else being a long-shot.

Posted
Porcello basically anchored a staff that was deemed a question mark in the offseason for a team that will go from last place to first place. I think that means something to a lot of voters.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...