Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Cherington is slowly beginning to show even his biggest supporters that he may be a few smokes short of a pack. Giving Ortiz arbitration was a ridiculous move except for the Ben Cherry worshippers on the board. But what's done is done; we can only hope that the arbiter will decide the Red Sox offer was the fairest an best.

 

What's like pouring salt on an open wound is how ownership and the FO talk about brining Big Diva back as their biggest and most important "FA signing" of the winter. Where the hell do they think he was going to go? Do they really think there was somebody else stupid enough to pay him even close to what he's going to get from the Sox via arbitration? If there was we certainly never heard about it, and I've got some news for you---neither did Big Diva.

  • Replies 162
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
What's like pouring salt on an open wound is how ownership and the FO talk about brining Big Diva back as their biggest and most important "FA signing" of the winter. Where the hell do they think he was going to go? Do they really think there was somebody else stupid enough to pay him even close to what he's going to get from the Sox via arbitration? If there was we certainly never heard about it' date=' and I've got some news for you---neither did Big Diva.[/quote']

 

I will be very curious to see Ortiz's reaction if he doesn't win his arbitration hearing. Will he pout or will he shrug it off and play!

Posted
Half our opening day roster might be bench players. I'm really feeling like we are playing for 3rd in the division right now which may as well be not playing at all as far as I'm concerned...

 

Unfourtunatly this is our reality right now. Hopefully we will sign Ross and Oswalt and our reality could change dramatically, regardless Crawford and Kalish will be available early in the season.

 

BTW where in the hell have you been TED101, you should post more often my friend. I hope everything is going alright with you and your family. :)

Posted
I will be very curious to see Ortiz's reaction if he doesn't win his arbitration hearing. Will he pout or will he shrug it off and play!

 

 

Better still I'd love to have been a fly on the wall when the Sox appealed to Diva's sense of 'team' and asked if he'd consider taking less so they could sign better talent.

Posted
Better still I'd love to have been a fly on the wall when the Sox appealed to Diva's sense of 'team' and asked if he'd consider taking less so they could sign better talent.

 

LOL! YGTBSM!

Posted
Cherington is slowly beginning to show even his biggest supporters that he may be a few smokes short of a pack. Giving Ortiz arbitration was a ridiculous move except for the Ben Cherry worshippers on the board. But what's done is done; we can only hope that the arbiter will decide the Red Sox offer was the fairest an best.

 

I'm officially denouncing the Ortiz move. If it cost Scutaro, I hate hate hate the move. But I just don't know how you could blame BC for much else. He had 25-30 million to fill DH, SS, 2 SP spots, closer, and maybe setup. You can't fill six significant positions at 4 million a piece, you just can't, but I honestly thinking he's doing the best job he can without even touching the farm system. It impresses me a lot that he's kept the team's prospects and filled some key holes. I think we're close, he just needs to make some finishing touches.

Posted

As soon as I start to get frustrated w/the Sox and what that opening day lineup might look like and the first weeks pitching rotations look like... I remind myself: this season is 162 games long. Plenty of time for plenty to happen.

 

I'm hoping for C.Ross, I like that guy.

Posted

The way i see it ( i could be wrong) it would be much more difficult to replace Ortiz' .950 OPS bat, than Scutaro's fielding and offense.

 

If Ortiz loses in arb, then they made the right move. If he wins, well then they f***ed themselves.

Posted
The way i see it ( i could be wrong) it would be much more difficult to replace Ortiz' .950 OPS bat, than Scutaro's fielding and offense.

 

If Ortiz loses in arb, then they made the right move. If he wins, well then they f***ed themselves.

 

And he won't win arbitration, that's a near certainty. $16mm is entirely too much for a DH.

 

In terms of Cody Ross, I think it's a fantastic move. A career .912 OPS vs LHP? That's exactly what we need. Makes this team much better vs LHP. And he'll come fairly cheap. Cheap enough that we can afford another SP.

Posted
I'm officially denouncing the Ortiz move. If it cost Scutaro' date=' I hate hate hate the move. But I just don't know how you could blame BC for much else. He had 25-30 million to fill DH, SS, 2 SP spots, closer, and maybe setup. You can't fill six significant positions at 4 million a piece, you just can't, but I honestly thinking he's doing the best job he can without even touching the farm system. It impresses me a lot that he's kept the team's prospects and filled some key holes. I think we're close, he just needs to make some finishing touches.[/quote']

 

Palodios, thanks for your update in reaction to my post. You said we had $30 million to spend. OK, I'll go along with that, no problem. If, however, you take away the $14 million we are going to have to pay Ortiz ( or is it $12 or $16--I split the difference), that would have netted a starting pitcher, a RH hitting outfielder, a set-up man and still have a few million left over. At least that is my opinion. Ortiz' arbitration crippled us as you now agree with.

 

Now we may still recover from that if we can sign Oswalt or trade for Floyd; I hear we could get Ross, though I'll believe it when I see it being somewhat cynical of what I've seen so far. We have our closer now via trade and the starter we hope to get could move one of our potential starters into a bullpen role where we may already have our set-up man in Melacon. Maybe Aceves will be our No. 5 starter and Bard can then get back into a pen that might look pretty good after all. It all depends what Cherington does in the next week or two or three. I still have some doubts about him, though.

Posted
I will be very curious to see Ortiz's reaction if he doesn't win his arbitration hearing. Will he pout or will he shrug it off and play!

 

My guess: pout.

Community Moderator
Posted
The Ortiz contract is a red herring. The problem is Lackey and CC's contracts. Unlike other sports, putting Lackey on IR and saving a cap hit isn't possible in MLB.
Posted
Palodios' date=' thanks for your update in reaction to my post. You said we had $30 million to spend. OK, I'll go along with that, no problem. If, however, you take away the $14 million we are going to have to pay Ortiz ( or is it $12 or $16--I split the difference), that would have netted a starting pitcher, a RH hitting outfielder, a set-up man and still have a few million left over. At least that is my opinion. Ortiz' arbitration crippled us as you now agree with.[/quote']

 

14 million would not have netted that much. Setup goes for 4-6 million. The starting pitching we've targeted is 8-10. And to replace Ortiz's value, it would have taken one of the expensive OF bats, who all went for 9-14 million a year.

Posted

Offering Ortiz arbitration was BC's worst move so far as a GM. It cannot be changed now. We still have upgraded in RF, we have found some decent trades to make some replacements in our pen. We did downgrade a little bit at SS, but I feel like with Aviles and Punto that we will be fine at SS. Overall, I think this team is right on track. If we sign Oswalt, I think that this makes for a decent offseason, especially with what BC was given to work with.

 

C- Salty/Shoppach/Lavarnway

1B- Gonzalez

2B- Pedroia

SS- Aviles/Punto/Iglesias

3B- Youkilis/Aviles

LF- Crawford/Ross/McDonald

CF- Ellsbury/McDonald

RF- Sweeney/Ross/Kalish/McDonald

DH- Ortiz/Lavarnway

 

SP

Lester

Beckett

Buchholz

Oswalt?/Rodriguez?/Jackson?/Floyd?

Bard/Aceves/Silva/Germano/Cook/Carlson/Mortenson/Padilla/Miller/etc.

 

Bullpen

Bailey (CL)

Melancon/Bard (SU)

Aceves/Melancon (7th)

Morales

Jenks

Albers

Padilla?

Miller?

Mortenson?

 

If we do one of the four to the 4th spot in the rotation, then I will be comfortable with this team. Bard would be a decent 5th starter, it would only be an added bonus if we could keep Bard and Aceves in the pen if one of our low risk starting pitcher signings can step up and fill the 5th spot in the rotation. I think we have options. When it is all said and done, this team will be fine.

Posted
Offering Ortiz arbitration was BC's worst move so far as a GM. It cannot be changed now. We still have upgraded in RF, we have found some decent trades to make some replacements in our pen. We did downgrade a little bit at SS, but I feel like with Aviles and Punto that we will be fine at SS. Overall, I think this team is right on track. If we sign Oswalt, I think that this makes for a decent offseason, especially with what BC was given to work with.

 

C- Salty/Shoppach/Lavarnway

1B- Gonzalez

2B- Pedroia

SS- Aviles/Punto/Iglesias

3B- Youkilis/Aviles

LF- Crawford/Ross/McDonald

CF- Ellsbury/McDonald

RF- Sweeney/Ross/Kalish/McDonald

DH- Ortiz/Lavarnway

 

SP

Lester

Beckett

Buchholz

Oswalt?/Rodriguez?/Jackson?/Floyd?

Bard/Aceves/Silva/Germano/Cook/Carlson/Mortenson/Padilla/Miller/etc.

 

Bullpen

Bailey (CL)

Melancon/Bard (SU)

Aceves/Melancon (7th)

Morales

Jenks

Albers

Padilla?

Miller?

Mortenson?

 

If we do one of the four to the 4th spot in the rotation, then I will be comfortable with this team. Bard would be a decent 5th starter, it would only be an added bonus if we could keep Bard and Aceves in the pen if one of our low risk starting pitcher signings can step up and fill the 5th spot in the rotation. I think we have options. When it is all said and done, this team will be fine.

I've been waiting for this move... This week might be.

Posted
Or they were waiting for Oswalt's price to drop to this range all along, and figured that Scutaro would be an easier way to shed payroll than Youkilis, their only RH power threat.

 

It makes sense.

 

Exactly.

Posted
I see I have a fan' date=' interesting[/quote']

 

And who would that be other than me?:rolleyes:

 

I've almost always supported you here. Now go back to washing bedpans. (j/k).:lol:

Posted
And who would that be other than me?:rolleyes:

 

I've almost always supported you here. Now go back to washing bedpans. (j/k).:lol:

 

Did you miss the whole Rivernator2004 resurrection of sorts recently? The guy made some decent posts then he flamed out in an epic blaze of glory.

Posted
Did you miss the whole Rivernator2004 resurrection of sorts recently? The guy made some decent posts then he flamed out in an epic blaze of glory.

 

He did have some good posts, then kept posting those weird pictures of the asian girl missing half her face.

Posted
Exactly.

 

Scutaro was basically a one year rental. At his age, he was not coming back. They figured they had a one year replacement for him on the roster--with Punto and Aviles around.

Posted
That doesn't explain why they are "looking for an everyday SS" now though

 

Yeah--I was going to mention that in my post. Hanley R. maybe?

 

But wait, maybe Miggy gets traded to Miami for Hanley...

Posted
No telling what moves are coming. We may even pick up Ryan Theriot or someone like that. He said he'd rather stay in the NL, unless he gets a starting job.
Posted
Offering Ortiz arbitration was BC's worst move so far as a GM. It cannot be changed now. We still have upgraded in RF, we have found some decent trades to make some replacements in our pen. We did downgrade a little bit at SS, but I feel like with Aviles and Punto that we will be fine at SS. Overall, I think this team is right on track. If we sign Oswalt, I think that this makes for a decent offseason, especially with what BC was given to work with.

 

C- Salty/Shoppach/Lavarnway

1B- Gonzalez

2B- Pedroia

SS- Aviles/Punto/Iglesias

3B- Youkilis/Aviles

LF- Crawford/Ross/McDonald

CF- Ellsbury/McDonald

RF- Sweeney/Ross/Kalish/McDonald

DH- Ortiz/Lavarnway

 

SP

Lester

Beckett

Buchholz

Oswalt?/Rodriguez?/Jackson?/Floyd?

Bard/Aceves/Silva/Germano/Cook/Carlson/Mortenson/Padilla/Miller/etc.

 

Bullpen

Bailey (CL)

Melancon/Bard (SU)

Aceves/Melancon (7th)

Morales

Jenks

Albers

Padilla?

Miller?

Mortenson?

 

If we do one of the four to the 4th spot in the rotation, then I will be comfortable with this team. Bard would be a decent 5th starter, it would only be an added bonus if we could keep Bard and Aceves in the pen if one of our low risk starting pitcher signings can step up and fill the 5th spot in the rotation. I think we have options. When it is all said and done, this team will be fine.

 

Let's be careful. I'm seeing too many people just assuming "Bard would be a decent 5th starter." How do we know this? He hasn't even thrown a pitch as starter yet. And there are plenty of other concerns too that are still hanging out there. I'm not ready to anoint this team as anything but a team that should once again finish 3rd in the division. People are jumping the gun, IMO.

Posted
Let's be careful. I'm seeing too many people just assuming "Bard would be a decent 5th starter." How do we know this? He hasn't even thrown a pitch as starter yet. And there are plenty of other concerns too that are still hanging out there. I'm not ready to anoint this team as anything but a team that should once again finish 3rd in the division. People are jumping the gun' date=' IMO.[/quote']

 

He is a dominant reliever, who has a terrible record as a starter in the minors. I'm inclined to agree with you, but I don't necessarily think everyone is jumping the gun, they are just trying to be optimistic about Bard possibly starting. He may be a great starter, he may have to go back to the pen. It remains to be seen. Either way at least we'll see him start in spring training, and hope for the best.

Posted
The glass can be half-full.

 

Basically the point I'm trying to make. No one is really saying with 100% certainty that Bard is going to be an effective starter. Given his track record as a starter he may not. The fact remains that he is a different pitcher now, and he could really surprise everyone.

Posted
Basically the point I'm trying to make. No one is really saying with 100% certainty that Bard is going to be an effective starter. Given his track record as a starter he may not. The fact remains that he is a different pitcher now' date=' and he could really surprise everyone.[/quote']

 

That wasn't directed at you, it was directed at Muggah.

 

Who's to say he won't suck, but who's to say he won't be excellent? (Bard)

 

The answer, as usual, probably lies somewhere in the middle.

Posted
That wasn't directed at you, it was directed at Muggah.

 

Who's to say he won't suck, but who's to say he won't be excellent? (Bard)

 

The answer, as usual, probably lies somewhere in the middle.

 

I know it wasn't directed towards me, I was just throwing my two cents in really.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...