I think that's a pretty fair assessment of my approach, open up to different interpretations. IMVHO, I think it starts with:
What do we need? That's simple. We needed a #2 SP, a 1B, and either a 2B or 3B.
What do we want? Still straightforward, but with a little less clarity. We needed a 2nd #2 SP or a #3. And maybe a power hitter. Maybe an RP.
What are our resources, both in terms of money and prospects.
So that's the start. How you get there becomes a little more random. There is no sense, imo, pontificating over Contreras or Alonso, even if I prefer Contreras. But acquiring Contreras changes the decision-tree for every downstream decision. Acquiring Contreras makes adding Bregman for more unlikely, thus making Durbin much more likely. That's just the way decision trees evolve.