Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
It was also a big story when Judge set the AL home run record. Not sure what your point is.

 

Well I can't help you then. It's a simple point.

Posted
It was also a big story when Judge set the AL home run record. Not sure what your point is.

 

If you want to know something about a hitter, which stat tells you the least? BA? OBP? SLG? OPS?

 

As we’ve gone round, and round on this it depends on who is asking, and what the wants, and needs are. It’s not a one size fits all.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Well I can't help you then. It's a simple point.

 

No it wasn’t.

 

The point was “batting average is the least informative offensive stat.”

 

Let’s start simple - what does batting average tell you about a hitter?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
As we’ve gone round, and round on this it depends on who is asking, and what the wants, and needs are. It’s not a one size fits all.

 

And yet you only cite BA…

Posted
No it wasn’t.

 

The point was “batting average is the least informative offensive stat.”

 

Let’s start simple - what does batting average tell you about a hitter?

 

Crank that Jack in the box all you want on this. One of these days it may actually open for you.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Hank Aaron was a lifetime .300 hitter with more than 700 home runs. But his xfmdoowops were very mediocre.

 

I know you're trying to be funny (and not being funny). But there was nothing mediocre about Aaron's offensive numbers in any context.

Posted
No it wasn’t.

 

The point was “batting average is the least informative offensive stat.”

 

Let’s start simple - what does batting average tell you about a hitter?

 

You missed the post I was responding to. My point was that batting average still matters to players and fans.

 

But OK, let's look at OBP. What constitutes the greatest part of OBP?

 

BA is a starting point for measuring performance. If you have a .000 BA, there's no way the other numbers can be good.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
You missed the post I was responding to. My point was that batting average still matters to players and fans.

 

But OK, let's look at OBP. What constitutes the greatest part of OBP?

 

BA is a starting point for measuring performance. If you have a .000 BA, there's no way the other numbers can be good.

 

I’ve already mentioned it survives on its popularity. It’s not going anywhere, but what does it tell you?

Posted
Batting average is merely a component of OBP and SLG. By itself it's meh.

 

But BA is what Hank Aaron liked the best, so it wasn’t meh to him. As always different strokes for different folks, and a good stroke will most likely get you a higher BA.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
You missed the post I was responding to. My point was that batting average still matters to players and fans.

 

But OK, let's look at OBP. What constitutes the greatest part of OBP?

 

BA is a starting point for measuring performance. If you have a .000 BA, there's no way the other numbers can be good.

 

That's a logical fallacy Bellhorn.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
You missed the post I was responding to. My point was that batting average still matters to players and fans.

 

But OK, let's look at OBP. What constitutes the greatest part of OBP?

 

BA is a starting point for measuring performance. If you have a .000 BA, there's no way the other numbers can be good.

 

So there’s no value in a player who goes 0 for 1 with 9 walks in 10 PA?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
But BA is what Hank Aaron liked the best, so it wasn’t meh to him. As always different strokes for different folks, and a good stroke will most likely get you a higher BA.

 

Yeah back in the day when they talked about horsepower, they meant literal horses, and we've moved on from that too. Even the older folk who loved riding horses have a car now.

Posted
So there’s no value in a player who goes 0 for 1 with 9 walks in 10 PA?

 

Tiny sample or unrealistic scenario - take your pick.

Posted
I’ve already mentioned it survives on its popularity. It’s not going anywhere, but what does it tell you?

 

What it tells you, and tells me are two different things. We get it 65 times over just today on your opinion of BA, but it isn’t changing anyone’s opinion like me who has a different opinion.

Posted
Yeah back in the day when they talked about horsepower, they meant literal horses, and we've moved on from that too. Even the older folk who loved riding horses have a car now.

 

Luckily you don’t speak for everyone, but nice try, and keep on trying.

Posted
And yet you only cite BA…

 

No, he used RBIs for Renfroe and only Renfroe, because it fit is narrative, better.

 

Career BA:

.241 Renfroe- RBIs matter more

.239 Kike- BA matters more

 

Posted
Yeah back in the day when they talked about horsepower, they meant literal horses, and we've moved on from that too. Even the older folk who loved riding horses have a car now.

 

Amazon uses cars for shipping. Nobody gets seasick unless they're texting.

Posted

Arraez has a slash line of 397/447/485 for an OPS of 931, and an OPS+ of 157.

 

Most of the OPS comes from the BA.

 

Is that a good thing, bad thing or neutral thing?

Posted

If you're hitting .397, the worst OPS you can have is .794, which is an OPS+ of 115-120.

 

So yeah, you want that guy in your lineup, even if you don't know what his OBP or SLG are.

Posted
That's a logical fallacy Bellhorn.

 

Functionally batting average tells the frequency a ball player successfully puts a ball in play. Putting balls in play is an important function in and of itself. As a coach/ manager I want my players to put balls in play successfully. It is as simple as that.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Tiny sample or unrealistic scenario - take your pick.

 

You made the sweeping generalization. I can apply realistic numbers if you like…

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Arraez has a slash line of 397/447/485 for an OPS of 931, and an OPS+ of 157.

 

Most of the OPS comes from the BA.

 

Is that a good thing, bad thing or neutral thing?

 

It’s a good thing, but you went beyond BA to get there.

 

Joey Meneses is batting .307. Ryan Noda is batting .249. Who is having the better season? (I avoided using Juan Soto here on purpose.)

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Then do so.

 

Ok.

 

If a player draws 3 walks and hits 2 sac flies but goes 0 for 5, is there value in that?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...