Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Brasier is not our worst pitcher. Not even close.

 

Yes, it's not rocket science.

 

Who is worst?

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
It's a fair question, Mr Know-it-all.

 

They aren’t going to be sellers. They are in the WC race and hopefully soon will be healthier. All you need to do in October is make the playoffs. The Braves proved that last year.

Still, playing unwatchable brain dead baseball like tonight isn’t going to help.

Posted
Who is worst?

 

On the 26, now?

The question is worse not worst, because there are at least 3:

 

Diekman easily

Ort obviously

Valdez clearly

 

Sawamura- maybe

 

Davis- maybe

 

Strahm- recently

 

On the IL:

Barnes

Seabold

Maybe Danish

 

Starting, now:

Crawford

 

Is that enough?

 

Some of these names are debatable, but no way is Brasier the worst.

 

Eye Test

Red's Eye Test

Stats

Metrics

Bloom's opinion

Cora's opinion

 

Posted
On the 26, now?

The question is worse not worst, because there are at least 3:

 

Diekman easily

Ort obviously

Valdez clearly

 

Sawamura- maybe

 

Davis- maybe

 

Strahm- recently

 

On the IL:

Barnes

Seabold

Maybe Danish

 

Starting, now:

Crawford

 

Is that enough?

 

Some of these names are debatable, but no way is Brasier the worst.

 

Eye Test

Red's Eye Test

Stats

Metrics

Bloom's opinion

Cora's opinion

 

We are talking about the BP dude. Brasier is worse than all of these except Barnes, and yes, it’s not even close.

Posted
We are talking about the BP dude. Brasier is worse than all of these except Barnes, and yes, it’s not even close.

 

I knew you wouldn’t actually answer my question. Whoever is not an answer.

Posted
Whoever. Whoever is better than Brasier. Not rocket science.

 

Brasier didn’t lose this game for us. That would be on

 

Verdugo

Cordero

And Vasquez

Posted
I knew you wouldn’t actually answer my question. Whoever is not an answer.

 

Easy, who went after Brasier? Those!

 

Plus, who else were available? Well, them.

 

Answered?

 

You just don’t put Brasier in close games.

 

Brasier is the worst RP in the team in my book along with Barnes.

Posted
Brasier didn’t lose this game for us. That would be on

 

Verdugo

Cordero

And Vasquez

 

He started the debacle.

Posted
Keep sending Brasier, Cora.

 

One more time. The Sox lost 3-2, and 2 of the Rays runs were unearned. By no conceivable calculation can this loss be blamed on Brasier or, for that matter, Cora. Verdugo got himself picked off 3b with no one out. Cordero and Stahm committed the errors that brought in the 2 unearned Rays runs. The top 4 in the Sox batting order went to the plate 16 times and got 1 hit, 1 BB and 5 K's.

Posted
We are talking about the BP dude. Brasier is worse than all of these except Barnes, and yes, it’s not even close.

 

Diekman should have been DFA'd weeks ago. He's way worse.

 

Everybody I listed is or has been in the BP, this year, except Seabold, who may be, soon.

 

Go ahead and throw out Seabold & Crawford. The rest are straight pen guys.

 

Diekman, Barnes, Ort and Valdez are worse.

 

Sawamura, Danish, Davis and the recent Strahm are close.

Posted (edited)
He started the debacle.

 

No, actually, Sale started the debacle by not coming out to pitch the 6th inning.

 

That's silly, of course, but not much sillier than blaming the loss on Brasier, who actually got two outs in the 6th before Strahm was brought in to pitch to Choi, who was then pinch-hit for by Majia, who singled and was followed by Walls who also singled, which led to the two egregious errors by Strahm (not Brasier) and Cordero (also not Brasier).

 

If anything, one can make a case for leaving Brasier in to pitch to Choi because he struck out the last hitter (Arozorena) he faced.

Edited by Maxbialystock
Posted
He started the debacle.

 

He gave up one ER. It happens. I don’t think he pitched awful. If not for the brain dead baseball his teammates displayed we still would have had a good chance to win this game.

Posted
Diekman should have been DFA'd weeks ago. He's way worse.

 

Everybody I listed is or has been in the BP, this year, except Seabold, who may be, soon.

 

Go ahead and throw out Seabold & Crawford. The rest are straight pen guys.

 

Diekman, Barnes, Ort and Valdez are worse.

 

Sawamura, Danish, Davis and the recent Strahm are close.

 

Exactly. Eliminating Barnes and Danish (since they aren’t on the active roster right now), you’ve 4 guys in Sawamura, Brasier, Davis and Strahm who all have their moments good and bad, and like Forrest Gump’s box of chocolates, you never know what you’ll get from them on a given night. And you generally are going to use at least one per game.

Posted
Exactly. Eliminating Barnes and Danish (since they aren’t on the active roster right now), you’ve 4 guys in Sawamura, Brasier, Davis and Strahm who all have their moments good and bad, and like Forrest Gump’s box of chocolates, you never know what you’ll get from them on a given night. And you generally are going to use at least one per game.

 

Certainly Ort and Valdez are just as speculative, too.

 

I'm no fan of counting recency ab ove all else, but before tonight, these are the last 4 weeks OPS Against...

 

.296 Schreiber

.569 Brasier

.569 Sawamura

.630 Houck

.647 Davis

.680 Strahm

.750 Danish

.768 Diekman

.785 Valdez

 

Now, I'm not saying Btrasier is better than those behind him, on this list, but going with the hot hand is not really something you can blame a manager for doing.

 

Last 2 weeks? Okay, Brasier is worse than maybe all but Diekman, but still...Diekman's 1.239 OPSA in the last 7 games clearly puts him behind Brasier as "the worst."

 

 

Posted
All this being said, I would not blink an eye, if we traded, demoted or DFA'd Brasier, tomorrow, but he's not #1, 2 or even 3 on my DFA list.
Posted
Certainly Ort and Valdez are just as speculative, too.

 

I'm no fan of counting recency ab ove all else, but before tonight, these are the last 4 weeks OPS Against...

 

.296 Schreiber

.569 Brasier

.569 Sawamura

.630 Houck

.647 Davis

.680 Strahm

.750 Danish

.768 Diekman

.785 Valdez

 

Now, I'm not saying Btrasier is better than those behind him, on this list, but going with the hot hand is not really something you can blame a manager for doing.

 

Last 2 weeks? Okay, Brasier is worse than maybe all but Diekman, but still...Diekman's 1.239 OPSA in the last 7 games clearly puts him behind Brasier as "the worst."

 

 

 

Just an eyeball test but Ort seems to have done ok.

Brasier is on and off like most RPs.

Posted
In 2.1 IP.

 

Brasier has quite a few nice 2.1 IP stretches.

 

Season to date, Brasier had an excellent April (ERA 2.57, 7 IP), lousy May (ERA 7.84, 10.1 IP), excellent June (ERA 2.25, 12 IP), and lousy July (ERA 6.75, 4 IP).

Posted
Season to date, Brasier had an excellent April (ERA 2.57, 7 IP), lousy May (ERA 7.84, 10.1 IP), excellent June (ERA 2.25, 12 IP), and lousy July (ERA 6.75, 4 IP).

 

I don't want to sound like I'm confident in Brasier. I'm not, right now. I just think others are worse and mayb e project to be worse going forward.

Community Moderator
Posted
Season to date, Brasier had an excellent April (ERA 2.57, 7 IP), lousy May (ERA 7.84, 10.1 IP), excellent June (ERA 2.25, 12 IP), and lousy July (ERA 6.75, 4 IP).

 

Per Statcast:

 

Exit Velocity: Bottom 5%

Hard Hit %: Bottom 5%

BB%: Top 5%

 

He's not walking a lot of guys, but guys are really squaring him up. He was "good" in June, but that may be more due to BABIP luck than anything else.

Community Moderator
Posted
I don't want to sound like I'm confident in Brasier. I'm not, right now. I just think others are worse and mayb e project to be worse going forward.

 

Valdez and Sawamura? I don't seem them dumping Dreckman until next season.

Posted
Per Statcast:

 

Exit Velocity: Bottom 5%

Hard Hit %: Bottom 5%

BB%: Top 5%

 

He's not walking a lot of guys, but guys are really squaring him up. He was "good" in June, but that may be more due to BABIP luck than anything else.

 

How do these numbers stack up to Diekman?

Community Moderator
Posted
How do these numbers stack up to Diekman?

 

They are completely different pitchers. Diekman's issues are the neverending walks. If he stopped walking guys, he could be a closer. Diekman's Statcast is lit up red like a Christmas tree except for BB% (bottom 1%), xOBP (bottom 3%). His EV is bottom 23, but it is offset by a Brl rate of top 81. I can see why Bloom took a chance on Diekman for at least one year when you look at the metrics.

Posted
They are completely different pitchers. Diekman's issues are the neverending walks. If he stopped walking guys, he could be a closer. Diekman's Statcast is lit up red like a Christmas tree except for BB% (bottom 1%), xOBP (bottom 3%). His EV is bottom 23, but it is offset by a Brl rate of top 81. I can see why Bloom took a chance on Diekman for at least one year when you look at the metrics.

 

But if the Dreck Man could figure out how not to walk guys he'd have done it long ago...

Posted
They are completely different pitchers. Diekman's issues are the neverending walks. If he stopped walking guys, he could be a closer. Diekman's Statcast is lit up red like a Christmas tree except for BB% (bottom 1%), xOBP (bottom 3%). His EV is bottom 23, but it is offset by a Brl rate of top 81. I can see why Bloom took a chance on Diekman for at least one year when you look at the metrics.

 

If you had to DFA Diekman or Brasier, today, who would you choose?

 

How do Ort and Valdez fall on your first to be DFA'd chart?

 

Anyone else high on your list?

 

(Not the list you think Bloom has, but your list.)

Posted
If you had to DFA Diekman or Brasier, today, who would you choose?

 

How do Ort and Valdez fall on your first to be DFA'd chart?

 

Anyone else high on your list?

 

(Not the list you think Bloom has, but your list.)

 

No one is DFA'ing Ort right now, that's for sure. The others are looking very fungible indeed.

Posted
No one is DFA'ing Ort right now, that's for sure. The others are looking very fungible indeed.

 

For sure?

 

Because of 2 IP?

Posted
For sure?

 

Because of 2 IP?

 

OK, it's not a certainty, but Ort pitched well for Woo, they brought him up and he has done well in his small MLB sample. That's not usually the guy you DFA.

Posted
OK, it's not a certainty, but Ort pitched well for Woo, they brought him up and he has done well in his small MLB sample. That's not usually the guy you DFA.

 

Quite often the guy you most recently added to the 40, is the first to go. Some never even play a game.

 

Yes, Ort did well at Woo, but so have many pitchers- some have not looked as good, but with much larger ML sample sizes.

 

I could be wrong, but I really don't think Brasier is in the top 2-3 on Bloom's DFA list.

 

We may not find out, soon, since others with options will be demoted, first, in all likelihood.

Posted
Quite often the guy you most recently added to the 40, is the first to go. Some never even play a game.

 

Yes, Ort did well at Woo, but so have many pitchers- some have not looked as good, but with much larger ML sample sizes.

 

I could be wrong, but I really don't think Brasier is in the top 2-3 on Bloom's DFA list.

 

We may not find out, soon, since others with options will be demoted, first, in all likelihood.

 

The thing about Ort is that he's sort of a Bloom project. They've invested two years in developing him. And we got him from the Yankees!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...