Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

With 2020 coming soon, now may be time to reflect on the past 10 years. Or 20…

Compare both decades of this Red Sox Century. Boston won two world titles in each: ’04 and ’07; ’13 and ’18. The Sox also had MVPs and Cy Young winners in both 10-year spans: Pedroia and Martinez; Betts and Porcello.

 

2000-2009

Regular: 920-699 .568, seven 90-win seasons, 1 first place, 8 seconds, 1 third.

Post: 34-23 .596, 2-2 ALCS, 4-2 ALDS.

Notables: 5 Wild Card berths, made Game Seven of the ALCS 4 times.

2010-2019

Regular: 872-748 .538, five 90-win seasons, 4 first place finishes, 3 thirds, 3 fifths.

Post: 23-14 .622, 2-0 ALCS, 2-2 ALDS.

Notables: 3 straight AL East crowns, 4 in 6 years.

 

Idiots breaking an 86 year-old curse; the greatest comeback in baseball history.

David and Manny, Pedro and Schill. DLowe and Wake, Foulke and Tek. Mueller, Millar… OCab and Nomar, Damon and Nixon.

 

Underrated ‘07 champs, dominant from April through October.

Dustin and Youk, Beckett and Lowell. Pap and Okie, Coco and Ells. Dice-K Matsuzaka.

 

Boston Strong, Bearded Band of Brothers, this is our f***ing city.

Papi, Pedey, Koji… Lester and Buck, Salty and Vic. Gomes and Napoli. Drew brothers.

 

Do Damage, outfield dances, a franchise-record 119 wins.

Mookie/Beni/JBJ. Bogie and Rafie. JD, Brockstar, Joe Kelly. Pearce and Eovaldi. Nunez and Moreland: PH WS HRs. Chris Sale.

 

The Owes or the Teens? Which Red Sox decade is your favorite… and why?

Edited by 5GoldGloves:OF,75
Posted
Nothing will ever equal 2004 and it's not just the WS Championship. Nothing will ever match beating the MFY after being down 3-0, something that had never been done before, and then winning the World Series Championship. The WS was just "gravy on the cake" as my friend with a gift for malapropisms says. If the Sox hadn't won another game between the 2004 WS and the end of the 2010 season that decade would still be my favorite.
Posted

As Dewey says, nothing can top a decade that had 2004 in it.

 

But 2010-2019 was a very admirable sequel. And 2018 was the dream season.

Posted

My dad died in March ’04 – I’m not going to say ’03 made his illness worse, but it didn’t help. So for me, when the Sox finally won, it was less exultation than exhaustion, more relief than disbelief.

 

I favor the 2010s, because I’ve been able to share this decade with my son. He was almost three when the Sox won in ‘13; I woke him up to see the last out in case they never won again in his lifetime. I got to wake him again five years later.

Posted
My dad died in March ’04 – I’m not going to say ’03 made his illness worse, but it didn’t help. So for me, when the Sox finally won, it was less exultation than exhaustion, more relief than disbelief.

 

I favor the 2010s, because I’ve been able to share this decade with my son. He was almost three when the Sox won in ‘13; I woke him up to see the last out in case they never won again in his lifetime. I got to wake him again five years later.

 

I got married in ‘04 and my daughter was born in ‘07. I’m not allowed to like the other decade better...

Posted
2000-2009 took the cake. The second decade was 3 more layers of icing. The net decade will BLOOM like spring flowers, I'm sure. But first we have to cut the budget to self flagellate for all the success of the 2000-2019 period.
Posted
2000-2009 took the cake. The second decade was 3 more layers of icing. The net decade will BLOOM like spring flowers, I'm sure. But first we have to cut the budget to self flagellate for all the success of the 2000-2019 period.

 

"Three layers?"

 

2000-2009- 2 rings in 6 playoff runs

 

2010-2019- 2 rings in 4 playoff runs

Posted
‘00-‘09

 

00-09 of course gets the nod but I loved me the decade of the 70's! Truth be told though, I had my most amount of fun with baseball during the decade of the 60's. It is not all about winning the gold ring for me. it's as much about the hunt where I come from.

Posted
00-09 of course gets the nod but I loved me the decade of the 70's! Truth be told though, I had my most amount of fun with baseball during the decade of the 60's. It is not all about winning the gold ring for me. it's as much about the hunt where I come from.

 

Those 70's teams were fun to watch. I was a kid, at the time, so maybe that is part of the nostalgia, but we had some colorful and/or talented players to cheer for: Luis Tiant, Fred Lynn, Jim Rice, Yaz, Bill Lee, Rico, Fisk, Evans, Burleson and on and on...

 

The ring in 2004 beats them all, though. I wasn't sure I'd ever see one.

 

Thanks, Henry.

Thanks, Theo.

Thanks, Dan D for setting the table.

Thanks, Papi, Manny, Schill, Pedro, VTek and everyone who helped make that dream come true.

Posted
That’s not almost backwards.

 

Why didu you like the 1980's so much?

 

The Sox finished 4th place or lower 6 times that decade. The first 5 years of that decade was the team's least successful stretch since the first half of the 1960's through to today...

Posted
Why didu you like the 1980's so much?

 

The Sox finished 4th place or lower 6 times that decade. The first 5 years of that decade was the team's least successful stretch since the first half of the 1960's through to today...

 

The only thing great about the 80's was watching Clemens and Boggs, and both soured by either using PEDs and/or signing with the Yanks.

Posted
The only thing great about the 80's was watching Clemens and Boggs, and both soured by either using PEDs and/or signing with the Yanks.

 

That's like getting excited about the 2012 Red Sox because they had Ortiz, AGon, Lester and Beckett...

Posted
The only thing great about the 80's was watching Clemens and Boggs, and both soured by either using PEDs and/or signing with the Yanks.

 

To be fair, those are 90s gripes on those players, not 80s.

Community Moderator
Posted
Why didu you like the 1980's so much?

 

The Sox finished 4th place or lower 6 times that decade. The first 5 years of that decade was the team's least successful stretch since the first half of the 1960's through to today...

 

I was 9 in 1986, so it was my prime card collecting/baseball daydreaming days. Team was pretty good from 86 on.

Community Moderator
Posted
The only thing great about the 80's was watching Clemens and Boggs, and both soured by either using PEDs and/or signing with the Yanks.

 

 

Dwight Evans and Jim Rice hater. ^^^^

Posted
I was 9 in 1986, so it was my prime card collecting/baseball daydreaming days. Team was pretty good from 86 on.

 

Except in October...

Posted

Those '80s Sox, with three division crowns in five years, were loaded with young homegrown regulars, stars and borderliners; the '88 Morgan Magic squad started an all-homegrown nine in the playoffs. Nothing like rooting for and watching your own progenies as they develop into winners.

 

Back to the title of the thread: by my count, it's currently 8-1 for the 2000s. That's about the ratio I expected, as nostalgia will never end for the monumental greatest choke of all-time by the '04 Yankees.

 

I'm still curious if there are any other talksox posters or lurkers who give a slight edge to this current decade? There may be someone with a more personal connection or a younger poster who could better appreciate fandom in the Teens, or maybe even an old-schooler who favors four first place clubs over one first and five Wild Cards...

Posted
Being one out away in 86 is light years ahead of anything since 1918. That team was great and should be cherished.

 

In 1975 was pretty close too - 7 outs away.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...