Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 218
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Shame they couldn't get him in from second with one our and two of our leadoff men up. A run there would have made it tight. Their pitcher was throwing 97 MPH sinking fastballs so he wasn't easy to hit.
Posted
How many 4.6+ ERA pitchers have more Ws than Ls? And how many 4.6+ ERA pitchers have more Ls than Ws? ... in MLB history?

 

That's kind of the point.

 

 

You said good pitchers don't lose 20 games. I listed several good (and in a few cases great) pitchers who did.

 

Porcello has not been good this year, there is no disputing that point. His record is where it should be. He's lost a few where he pitched well but got no run support; he's also won a couple where he didn't pitch too well but got good run support that day.

Posted (edited)
How many 4.6+ ERA pitchers have more Ws than Ls? And how many 4.6+ ERA pitchers have more Ls than Ws? ... in MLB history?

 

That's kind of the point.

 

Frankly not impressed with the list of guys who lost lots of games. Porcello isn't lousy because he lost 16 games. He's just lousy this year. He has a hard time keeping the ball low and his command stinks. Going into this game his pitching WAR was .3, and it's sure to be lower now.

Edited by Maxbialystock
Posted
You said good pitchers don't lose 20 games. I listed several good (and in a few cases great) pitchers who did.

 

Porcello has not been good this year, there is no disputing that point. His record is where it should be. He's lost a few where he pitched well but got no run support; he's also won a couple where he didn't pitch too well but got good run support that day.

 

I meant in a large sample. Those and other examples are the exception of the rule. Not the rule.

Posted
The s*** show continues. It will be only two games in the loss column. That series really let the air out of the balloon. This team needs to find itself quickly.
Posted
Why bring that up, we don't need him. We can't give up any of our studs for him... Then again, f.... it, lets do it..........
Posted

Early day tomorrow, time to hit the sack, but not before saying this one is squarely on Farrell. His starter had already given up 4 runs and 2 dingers in 5 innings. In the 6th Porcello was throwing everything in the middle of the zone, and unsurprisingly the Jays were hitting him. During all that Farrell didn't even signal Vazquez to talk to this pitcher, nor did he send out the pitching coach. No doubt he wanted to save his bullpen, but ended up having to use them anyway only with the game now pretty much out of reach. Barnes giving up 2 in the 9th doesn't count because, had Farrell acted sooner, Kimbrel would be pitching in the 9th.

 

On top of everything else, leaving Porcello in like that signaled to the lineup that their manager was not taking this game seriously despite the oncoming Yankees and just 25 games to go. Indeed, Farrell gave every sign he thought we were back in April. I mean that's the April rule (also May, June, and even July): the starter stays until 7 runs or 100 pitches or whatever.

Posted
Frankly not impressed with the list of guys who lost lots of games. Porcello isn't lousy because he lost 16 games. He's just lousy this year. He has a hard time keeping the ball low and his command stinks. Going into this game his pitching WAR was .3, and it's sure to be lower now.

 

As I said, you don't need stats to figure out that he sucks. His ERA, FIP, SiERA, HR/FB and even his W-R record, simply reflects what he is... a bum.

Posted
Can we Trade Barnes to the Yanks, what you say Jackson. haha

 

I wouldn't have him on my roster in the post season. Since we are going to lose this game anyway, at least we have learned that he shouldn't be on our PO roster.

Posted
Yeah, I can't defend Porcello any more. He's hurting us this year, plain and simple.

 

There is no more time. He needs to get a phantom injury and Johnson has to be given a chance to start. No more time....

Posted
Frankly not impressed with the list of guys who lost lots of games. Porcello isn't lousy because he lost 16 games. He's just lousy this year. He has a hard time keeping the ball low and his command stinks. Going into this game his pitching WAR was .3, and it's sure to be lower now.
I agree with you that Porcello isn't lousy because he has lost 16 games. He has lost 16 games, because he has been lousy.
Posted
One last tiny thought. If the Fenway fans haven't booed yet tonight, they are sheep. They pay a steep price for seats, parking, food, etc, and the players paid a ridiculous amount of money. And the ones over 30 with the long range contracts don't even have to play to get paid a ton. Look what the fans are paying Sandoval not to play for us. Price and Porcello between them are together getting paid $50M this year for basically hurting the team. How much is $50M? Billionaire Michael Dell just gave $36M for the victims of Harvey and is being lionized. Half of $50M is enough to live on comfortably for a lifetime and raise a family and send kids to college. And it's just one year and, this year, not even earned.
Posted
As I said, you don't need stats to figure out that he sucks. His ERA, FIP, SiERA, HR/FB and even his W-R record, simply reflects what he is... a bum.

 

The thing is, this isn't that far below his career norms:

 

Starting from his rookie year in 2009 -

 

ERA 3.96, 4.92, 4.75, 4.59, 4.32, 3.43, 4.92, 3.15, 4.67

WHIP 1.336, 1.389, 1.407, 1.531, 1.282, 1.231, 1.360, 1.009, 1.401

HR/9 1.2, 1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.9, 0.8, 1.3, 0.9, 1.7

 

The W-L and HR/9 are way out of norm, but a lot of his stats are fairly average for him.

 

He's a low #3, #4 type pitcher. Last year was the outlier.

Posted
The thing is, this isn't that far below his career norms:

 

Starting from his rookie year in 2009 -

 

ERA 3.96, 4.92, 4.75, 4.59, 4.32, 3.43, 4.92, 3.15, 4.67

WHIP 1.336, 1.389, 1.407, 1.531, 1.282, 1.231, 1.360, 1.009, 1.401

HR/9 1.2, 1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.9, 0.8, 1.3, 0.9, 1.7

 

The W-L and HR/9 are way out of norm, but a lot of his stats are fairly average for him.

 

He's a low #3, #4 type pitcher. Last year was the outlier.

I agree with this. Last year was the outlier. He is a #4 innings eater with a 4.25 ERA. Coming off that outlier year, the FO was fooling itself thinking that they had 3 aces in the rotation and could get by with less runs. Porcello has always needed a lot of run support. Even in his Cy Young season, he got a ton of run support.
Posted

HR/9 1.2, 1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.9, 0.8, 1.3, 0.9, 1.7

 

I'm not disagreeing with the idea that 2016 was an outlier, but that 1.7 looks way out of wack as well.

Posted
HR/9 1.2, 1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.9, 0.8, 1.3, 0.9, 1.7

 

I'm not disagreeing with the idea that 2016 was an outlier, but that 1.7 looks way out of wack as well.

 

It's out of whack because of the way he is pitching. There is no great mystery, at least not to opposing lineups. In a normal start this year, Porcello keeps the ball up in the zone. Last night there were times when he could keep it low, but in the 6th everything was up--in the middle, actually. This is in an era when those shifts have optimized keeping the ball low.

Posted
Good pitchers don't lose 16 games. That's what this rudimentary stat says compadre. As you said, he sucks, you don't need to look at stats to figure out.

 

Then again a really god pitcher, Tommy Archer, lost about 20 games last season.

 

Now that was a head scratcher because almost everybody knows that kid has the stuff and is good.

 

I have liked Porcello since he plunked Youk and then threw him to the ground.

 

But he is sucking major donkey dick right now.

 

Just awful.

Posted
We didn't beat them last year without Carrasco and they have also added Encarnacion.

 

And Brantley ( sp ) is back as well.

 

The Guardians are the best team in the AL. They also have a good manager.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...