Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

JoeBrady

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,678

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by JoeBrady

  1. JoeBrady
    They are rather common now. In Bregman's case, he wanted to ensure he had a chance at a bounce-back season and to re-enter free agency. If you're coming off a good platform year, it is probably unimportant. This is the same reason why Alonso took a one-year contract, and why the NYY are offering Bellinger opt-outs.
  2. JoeBrady
    Since I have no idea how he communicates with other teams, I still don't care. I assume most trades are made on the basis of value.
  3. JoeBrady
    That's why I don't get worked up about these things. I have my preferences, as does everyone else. But if the team adds another $25M in spending, the $25M number means a heck of a lot more than my preference.
  4. JoeBrady
    To me, just focus on WAR. In a vacuum, I prefer OBP over HRs, but if the WAR difference between Bregman and Suarez is only 1.4, then the OBP/SLG difference is almost inconsequential.
  5. JoeBrady
    Most of these devices simply make research easier, or more thorough. Men's Health had an interesting article on this. The value of AI to the individual is that the individual can do a much more thorough search on their symptoms than any doctor can. A doctor gives you 15 minutes, with their knowledge limited to their specialties. I can input searches for 15 minutes, get a result in 5 seconds, then re-focus the search in another 15 minutes. You'll be able come up with a number of solutions, including the million-to-one shot.
  6. JoeBrady
    Not everyone can sign them, but there is not doubt that at least 10 teams can afford them. IRT to drafting them, that's a solid no. Most of these guys, if not all, have put in a lot of time in Japan. If they play in Japan until age 27, it would be ridiculous to expect them to put in another 6 years in MLB before becoming a FA.
  7. JoeBrady
    Yes and no. Unless you some type of monopolistic aspect to your company, then you have to continually pursue the customer. We kept improving our products because we always wanted to stay ahead of our competitors. Of course, BB is a monopoly. But even then, teams lose their attendance if they don't stay ahead of their competition.
  8. JoeBrady
    I agree 100%. As a Raiders' fan, I had this conversation with my Bears' friend. While Chicago has made unbelievable improvements over the past few years (and not just Caleb), the Raiders are now paying 4-5 coaches. You cannot fix stupid with more money. Just irt to Pitt and Cincy, both teams should be moving in. I think increased attendance and/or a playoff spot can easily pay for another $30M in acquisitions. Even if I am wrong, what's the point of owning a team if you don't want to compete.
  9. JoeBrady
    I see no evidence to support that. If Greene was on the block, teams would've been lined up around the block to trade for him. He's a borderline 'name your price' type of player.
  10. JoeBrady
    Fortunately for me, I pay no attention. In the off-season, you either do, or you no do.
  11. JoeBrady
    I think Suarez will be fine for two years. Anything more becomes questionable. One note is that he has 4 HRs in 40 ABs in Fenway.
  12. JoeBrady
    As I mentioned in one of my posts, if we acquired Arenado + Donovan, I think it makes us a much better team, without the cost of a premier prospect. If it's Arenado alone, probably aim for $30M in discounts.
  13. JoeBrady
    The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. So if 10 million RS fans can be happy with acquisitions that make us better, then the 1 million that hate it, will have to be sacrificed.
  14. JoeBrady
    I can get on board with that. To me, and feel free to disagree, a big upgrade at #2 is slightly more important than the big bat, but I am pretty indifferent to one or the other. So long as a I get one or the other.
  15. JoeBrady
    I've been fantasy BB for a long time. Having rookie pitchers come up and dominate is fairly common. But every year, without fail, there is a rush for a few elite hitting prospect. Their success rate, in terms of immediate fantasy value, is usually -0-. Guys that I thought had flawless minor league resumes, like Holiday and Rutschman, always take time to develop. Even guys that are great just one year later, usually struggle as rookies. I think James Wood has one of the best swings I've ever seen, and he didn't hit anything in the second half. And every team has a guy like that.
  16. JoeBrady
    There's no way to be sure. Chicago is a pretty good opportunity, similar to the RS. I remember Bay going to the NYM, or Cano going to the Mariners, and thinking these guys are ruining their careers for money they will never spend. But the Cubs are a good franchise.
  17. JoeBrady
    That's why I'm universally beloved. I've probably had more relocation packages than other people have had jobs. Why stress it when you can just offer me more severance.
  18. JoeBrady
    Assuming that's true, I have no problem. You have to be able to draw a line, whether I agree with the number or not. But, so long as the RS were willing to spend $30M+, then it just a matter of re-directing that money. If this was another 'well, we tried but then do nothing next', then it's problematic.
  19. JoeBrady
    Trust no one. But I'd make both those trades. I don't think either the Astros or the Dodgers would. But Paredes doesn't currently have a position. Neither does Rushing, and Duran would be a great fit. I think both proposals are ballpark correct, one way or another, and good fits all around.
  20. JoeBrady
    How much is that?
  21. JoeBrady
    I agree 100%. I definitely would not trade him, but I'd definitely put him in AAA for a full year, unless we had an injury and he was crushing the ball. He could still be a great player, but we have to make the investment.
  22. JoeBrady
    He won't retire, but we might have to cut him at age 37. That's old even for an accountant.
  23. JoeBrady
    It's an ancillary benefit, like watching them melt down every time we pick up AAA depth. Or really blow their minds and trade for both Arenado & Donovan, paying full freight, in exchange for a non-premium prospect package. The folks that love Donovan will hate it because of Arenado. The folks calling JH cheap will have to find a way to call him cheap, even after blowing thru the 2nd threshold. Watching heads explode will keep me entertained until opening day.
  24. JoeBrady
    To me, it is all about getting the best possible players. I'd rank getting a #2 higher than a big bat at 3rd, but understand the arguments. But if we go cheap at 3rd, we should increase our investment in a #2. Or leave Gray as our #2 and invest more heavily at 3rd/IF.
  25. JoeBrady
    No. Still too much. IMHO, at least the final four years, there is a chance he won't be in BB.
×
×
  • Create New...