Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    53,381
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. Think it’s from Breslow?
  2. Royals acquire Paul DeJong? Does this mean Bobby Witt Jr. is available?
  3. Sox acquire RHRP Lucas Sims from Cincinnati https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2024/07/red-sox-to-acquire-lucas-sims.html
  4. Texas is apparently both buying and selling. They dealt RHSP Mike Lorenzen to KC despite KC being ahead of them in the WC chase…
  5. First move du jour. The Pirates deal for a DFAd LHP named Josh Walker from the Mets…
  6. I wasn’t just referring to Boston. No one has made any moves today…
  7. No trades so far today? I find that shocking…
  8. It’s better than the Hosmer/Urias debacles…
  9. He did get a catcher and two pitchers already…
  10. The White Sox got very little in return…
  11. Join forces!! The I-90 Aqua Sox!
  12. BTV suggests Luis Perales as a good match.
  13. “Bad move” and “sunk cost” are completely different ideas. If a player is truly sunk cost, he has to be untradable…
  14. Former first rounder for former first rounder…
  15. Everyone goes right for Trey Ball, but other 1st round picks include Jason Place, Kolbrin Vitek, Bryan Price, Jay Groome. At least Yorke made AAA…
  16. Yorke was hardly one of the worst first round picks. He’s not even in the bottom 10…
  17. So the Sox traded a middle infield prospect for a pitcher? Hmmm…
  18. … but it’s an admission the best course of action would be to abandon Yoshida or Sale. If Sale was truly sunk cost, trading him away is the proper course…
  19. You do realize the “sunk cost principle” is predicated on the notion that abandoning the cost would be the smarter course, right? It doesn’t mean it’s a free no risk opportunity… So once you call Sale “sunk cost”, you’ve more than justified the logic in trading him. And you did this in post 1353…
  20. And did the Sox make another move related to this? It’s amazing how you can cling to a singular word in my post and go back and dig up evidence like this. There are some pessimistic fans who dislike any and every move. I don’t even get your argument. “I liked the trade, but I thought it meant more was coming.” 1. First of all, more did come. They signed Giolito later that week. It didn’t work out, but it did happen. Now this is evolving into to “I meant ‘even more than that’.” 2. People say “there must be more coming all the time out here. It happens with DFAs quite often. I’ve seen it get posted when a minor leaguer gets pulled from a game. 3. Yes it would have been nice to replace Giolito. But why did you expect it? Sale went down in ST multiple times and never got replaced…
  21. Where one new, effective reliever could have resulted in 3 more wins minimum?
  22. When I see Westbrook in the lineup and Romy in at 1b I die a little bit inside…
  23. Only Verdugo and Torres hit the ball hard…
  24. Yes, and it’s didn’t work out. But back in December when we all assumed Sale was headed for another partial season, we all liked this trade…
  25. I don’t think MLB front office people leap to “sunk cost” conclusions nearly as quickly as fans do…
×
×
  • Create New...