And as I said in an earlier post, look at the gulf between what Seager got and what Correa got. Correa was pretty much left standing in the game of musical chairs.
There are only so many $300 million offers out there.
I hear you.
The only explanation I can offer is that the time when you could keep your homegrown stars without committing to an exorbitantly large and long contract is past.
Whatever answer anyone gives would be a complete guess. My line has been Fire Fatse. It's mostly a joke. He was on the staff two years before this and he says they haven't really changed anything. But it does make you wonder when you see everyone except the Big 3 struggling.
The offense, what there is, is still being carried by 3 guys, 2 who are likely gone by next year, and the other who may be gone the year after.
That has to be causing the front office a bit of anxiety...
Words are cheap. Actions are more telling.
Mookie didn't have to sign an extension with the Dodgers. We all thought he was one of those guys who wanted to take the risk and get to free agency.
Seems like he wanted to be in LA, does it not?
The only thing is, "fair market value" is a matter of opinion. There's no consistency at all in the deals guys get.
Seager got $325 million.
Correa, who is 5 months younger and has a higher career WAR, got $105 million (with opt-outs each year).
That's a wild disparity for two similar players.
It's not a rational market.