It's all speculation who's making the calls on these things.
If Ben was opposed to the Panda signing, he should take the Cashman route. When the Yankees signed Soriano to that 3 year, 35 million deal, Cashman came right out and said it wasn't his idea. He kept his job and I think he actually gained some credibility.
That may well be a valid defense for Ben. I'm not sure it is for Farrell though. Too much underperformance and too many in-game blunders, physical and mental.
Is left field in Fenway really the easiest position on the field? I know it's small real estate-wise, but it seems to me there have been a colossal number of plays butchered out there over the years, by us and opposing teams alike.
Anomaly is kind of a key word here. With their 2015 'strategy', the Sox may have been trying to replicate a 'formula for success' when in fact they were trying to replicate an anomaly - a formula that usually fails.
The Royals have the best record in the AL. They have a 3.68 team ERA. But check out the starter/reliever split:
Starters 4.35
Relievers 2.18
So sk7326 is certainly correct that the Royals are succeeding despite a weak starting rotation.
I think there were a few other factors that contributed too.
1) 'Young free agent'
2) Supposed solid defense
3) Panda merchandise
A grab bag of goodies that was too hard to resist.
To me it kind of makes more sense for a team with a smaller payroll like the Royals to employ such a strategy. For a team with one of the highest payrolls to do it still seems wonky to me.
Even if the Red Sox wanted to trade Ortiz, who would they trade him to? I'm pretty sure the vesting option goes with him, so it would have to be a contending AL team with money, other than the Yankees. That leaves the Angels, maybe the Jays.
Here's a little factoid someone posted on the Globe forum.
During the Epstein years the Sox had a guy named Craig Shipley who was heavily involved in the international scouting. Shipley signed Iglesias, Tazawa and Bogaerts.
One of the first things Ben did as GM was fire Shipley.