Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. My comment was meant to ooze sarcasm aimed at our front office.
  2. The fact is we have Devers, Story, Mayer, Campbell, Grissom and Casas for 4 infield spots, not even counting Hamilton or Romy. Forking out for Bregman is extemely unlikely, IMHO.
  3. Alex is clearly not such a hot commodity. He might be this year's Bellinger/Chapman, another Boras client coming in expecting too much and ending up hung out to dry.
  4. Really dig the name Nazzan, I must say. Nice palindrome!
  5. I don't know, I obviously have very little faith left in the Sox will to expend that kind of money.
  6. Makes some sense baseball-wise, but is it enough to justify a $25 million AAV addition to the payroll for the next 6 years? Especially when the player's fit and value are both just a bit iffy.
  7. That's a lot of N's and Z's to give up!
  8. ESPN 24 79 23 78 22 87 Everyone knows they're now the Maestros of Mediocrity.
  9. Yes, this seems to be where things are. The NL is getting stronger and the AL is getting weaker. How'd that happen?
  10. Sure, you want me to waste my time looking up pre-season win projections for the last 3 years. I don't have to. I'm fully confident that the consensus projections for the Sox the last 3 years were somewhere in the 80-85 win range. I'm here all the time and I know we talked about the projections. Furthermore, at the end of each of the last 3 seasons hardly anyone said the Sox underachieved significantly and hardly anyone called for Cora's head. He got an extension in fact. If you insist on a look-up, I'll do it if I get time.
  11. 500-ish is something like 78-84 wins, like the Red Sox of the 2022-2024 seasons. Kind of obvious. Why do you ask questions like that?
  12. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the pre-season projected win totals (.500 ish) for the Sox the past 3 years turned out to be fairly accurate.
  13. Very George Costanza-esque, I know.
  14. Wow, how embarrassing. Great job Sox FO!
  15. As for signing Vlad as a free agent, if there are any other serious bidders, you know how that'd turn out! 😛
  16. moon said he'd trade Mayer for him if we get to unload Yoshida in the deal.
  17. I'm sure John Henry wouldn't mind dumping Raffy's contract for prospects. That'd be 30 mill a year more for FSG shareholders.
  18. So what exactly is your theory for the Sox commanding lead on the We Tried Tracker? https://blogs.fangraphs.com/introducing-the-we-tried-tracker/
  19. Sox could afford to sign 2 more quality relievers. That would make the pitching potentially solid. But the fact they already signed J. Wilson probably makes 2 additions unlikely. Can we have 1 at least? Yes, I know, Kyle Finnegan. I'd take him too when it comes down to it. Hell, I might take Kenley or Chris back.
  20. But who would be fabricating, and if there is fabricating, why wouldn't the Sox get it out there that it was inaccurate? If they're not really the Interest Kings, why are they letting the Interest Kings image run wild like this?
  21. Bumping this. Holmes and Treinen are the only ones on this list signed to date, is that correct?
  22. Yeah, sure seems like he was playing hurt, and they decided the proper move was to let him keep playing hurt!
  23. But hey, what does FanGraphs know? It's not like they're just using totally objective data and formulas or anything like that.
×
×
  • Create New...