Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Red Sox trade Hunter Renfroe in trade involving Jackie Bradley Jr


Recommended Posts

Posted
Do you honestly think anyone here or anywhere has said JBJ is a good MLB hitter? If so, please post the quote.

 

The facts are he hit .283 in '20 and .163 in '21. He's a .230 lifetime hitter, which is almost exactly in between; Renfroe's a career .237 hitter. The Sox team batting average just got 7/1000th worse...

 

It’s still hilarious to defend JBJ’s BA, or is it the need to defend Bloom for trading for him? Either way it’s hilarious.

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
EVERYONE is entitled to their opinion, and this s a talk forum. The problem is when someone has a different opinion as some on here. There should be a good balance, and some sort of disagreement, and it doesn’t mean one side is right over the other. Like I’ve said before there is a whole big world of Red Sox nation out there that doesn’t have the same opinion as some on here, but some can’t seem to handle that.

 

It is a talk forum, but there is a little clique that wants to rule the roost. They see themselves as a little smarter than others. If you go against any of them , they will gang up on you. They can insult you , but don't dare call them out. Feel free to express your ideas and opinions, but be prepared for the derision and name calling if your opinion upsets the "elite " clique.

Posted
Wow, what an obnoxious post.

 

Saying that some folks are Bloom sycophants is " obnoxious?" Have you read some of the truly obnoxious stuff that is posted here?

Posted
It is a talk forum, but there is a little clique that wants to rule the roost. They see themselves as a little smarter than others. If you go against any of them , they will gang up on you. They can insult you , but don't dare call them out. Feel free to express your ideas and opinions, but be prepared for the derision and name calling if your opinion upsets the "elite " clique.

 

Just do what I do. Just when they think they know the answers change the question. Drives them nuts.

Posted
Saying that some folks are Bloom sycophants is " obnoxious?" Have you read some of the truly obnoxious stuff that is posted here?

 

Well, I'd say you've officially become one of the obnoxious ones.

 

Before this you posted your little joke about 'if Bloom took a dump in the outfield' more than once. So yeah, you've definitely made the grade.

 

Congrats.

Posted
Is it April 1st? The Sox traded a 30 homer guy for a guy who can't hit water if he falls out of the boat. And who makes 2 million more a year. Those minor leaguers better be really good.
Posted
It is a talk forum, but there is a little clique that wants to rule the roost. They see themselves as a little smarter than others. If you go against any of them , they will gang up on you. They can insult you , but don't dare call them out. Feel free to express your ideas and opinions, but be prepared for the derision and name calling if your opinion upsets the "elite " clique.

 

Who's in this clique you speak of? Name names. All this "they" s*** is really lame.

Posted
Is it April 1st? The Sox traded a 30 homer guy for a guy who can't hit water if he falls out of the boat. And who makes 2 million more a year. Those minor leaguers better be really good.

 

Didn’t you read previous hilarious post that JBJ couldn’t hit, because he played on a new team facing different pitching?

Posted
Well, I'd say you've officially become one of the obnoxious ones.

 

Before this you posted your little joke about 'if Bloom took a dump in the outfield' more than once. So yeah, you've definitely made the grade.

 

Congrats.

You have an unusual way of determining what is " obnoxious " and what is okay. I could say more , but it's not worth the time. And I really don't care anyway.

Posted (edited)
Who's in this clique you speak of? Name names. All this "they" s*** is really lame.

 

No need for names. You know darn well who I mean. Don't be so coy. And don't interrogate me . That kind of stuff is really lame.

Edited by dgalehouse
Posted
You have an unusual way of determining what is " obnoxious " and what is okay. I could say more , but it's not worth the time. And I really don't care anyway.

 

Accusing fellow posters of being "sycophants" and being in an "elite clique" is pretty damn obnoxious to me, yes.

Posted
It continues to be difficult for me to imagine anyone actually seeing this as a productive move. Taking on JBJ's salary makes 0 sense to me. The complete package just ain't worth it. If people want to think that the two prospects coming over make it worth the cost, ok i guess. I don't see it myself but oh well. Hey - because he is the GM I will support him much as i did Dave Dombrowski. i'll continue to be loyal but I still don't like this move.
Posted
Renfroe: 576 OPS in the postseason.

 

How many at bats? Plenty of players don't have as good stats in the playoffs as in the post season. Look at Mookie Betts.

 

Too much of a small sample size for Renfroe

Posted
Accusing fellow posters of being "sycophants" and being in an "elite clique" is pretty damn obnoxious to me, yes.

 

Calling fellow posters obnoxious, calling them names, urging for them to be ignored, pushing for them to be banned , insulting them and their opinions,etc. is kind of obnoxious, as far as I can see. But that's okay. I am not complaining. Everyone can do as they please. But you don't complain about a lot of what I consider truly objectionable. Why now? Anyway , who cares? And I don't need any feuds. It's a waste of time. I will continue to have my own opinions and my own sense of what is funny and what is obnoxious. Have a nice day.

Posted
No need for names. You know darn well who I mean. Don't be so coy. And don't interrogate me . That kind of stuff is really lame.

 

I can help.

 

I know I’m that list. It doesn’t bother me, either…

Posted
How many at bats? Plenty of players don't have as good stats in the playoffs as in the post season. Look at Mookie Betts.

 

Too much of a small sample size for Renfroe

 

 

Lots of players have the occasional rough postseason. A rough two week stretch, even at a crucial time, is no reason to dump a player. Renfroe struggled heavily at the end of the Houston series, but you know who else did? Everyone else…

Posted
Who's in this clique you speak of? Name names. All this "they" s*** is really lame.

 

Names is the only thing bothering you? Are you saying everything said is true?

Posted
I expect JBJ to play RF this year

A Dugo in LF? That means that there really isn’t room for Schwarber unless they want to risk defensive catastrophe with him at 1B.

Posted
Hunter wasn't worth 7M in 2020, but now two years later he's worth it?
last season he was worth it, so you can hang your hat on the belief that he has figured out something. You can’t justify not paying Bradley last year but deeming him a good value after having his worst season.
Posted
Well first off I'm not the Red Sox so I don't feel obligated to fully defend this position. But it's for only one year, a year in which they're willing to go over the cap anyways, but they're also getting prospects back in return. They effectively got a guy who was considered by some a top 15 talent in this past years draft.

 

Also, and this is conjecture, I think it's unfair to call it a trade of Renfroe for JBJ, because those prospects have value and I don't think JBJ is replacing Renfroe as an everday player.

$11 million for a defensive replacement? I don’t think so.
Posted
Bloom lets JBJ walk. Bloom sycophants applaud. JBJ has terrible year. Bloom sycophants applaud . Bloom acquires Renfroe. Bloom sycophants applaud. Renfroe has a good year. Bloom sycophants applaud. Bloom trades Renfroe for JBJ . Bloom sycophants applaud. It really is kind of comical. But they can't help it. They are Bloom sycophants.

Who is applauding?

Posted
Saying that some folks are Bloom sycophants is " obnoxious?" Have you read some of the truly obnoxious stuff that is posted here?

 

It’s still name calling- something you just called out

Posted
$11 million for a defensive replacement? I don’t think so.

 

$11M for prospects might be the real reason.

 

It’s hard to grasp this one.

Posted
last season he was worth it, so you can hang your hat on the belief that he has figured out something. You can’t justify not paying Bradley last year but deeming him a good value after having his worst season.

 

Only on here would that be justified.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...