Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
I don't see anyone wanting to pay Perez or Richards at this point. Any team that is out of contention is just going to piecemeal a rotation together. They have no incentive to add Richards or Perez.

 

If we pay most of their contracts, and teams will take them both.

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
tricky thing about Rizzo is that he is a rental ...

 

Now, he has been down in 2020-21, but has also been a 4-win player as recently as 2019. His Statcast batted ball stats have not actually changed. He is still hitting it hard and squaring the ball as ever. His BABIP numbers have been silly outliers for his career that do not really square with his actual contact.

 

Dalbec's issue entirely about hitting the baseball on offense at least.

 

Rizzo is a costly deal and I'm not saying we should do it. But he's a good player and would be a huge upgrade at the position we are league worst at.

 

At his age, I'm not sure being a 4 win player 2 years ago matters all that much.

 

I do think he might do better than his 20-21 numbers, but there is probably a better chance he continues decline.

 

Now, we'd have him for 2 months, so no decline should be that quick.

 

He turns 32 in 10 days.

Posted
Why would they?

 

Have you seen some of these contender's 4 and 5 starters?

 

Yes, Perez and Richards haved sucked recently, but theirs have sucked all year and longer, and most GMs don't look at just your recent 6-8 starts to definitively value anybody.

 

Then, there are GMs and organizations who think they see a tweak they can make to a pitcher to improve them.

 

I'm talking about paying maybe all but a bit more than minimum wage to the other team.

 

You do know we signed Richards for $10M after not showing he was healthy for like 6 years. Now he's healthy.

 

We signed Perez to $6M after some pretty awful numbers in 2020.

 

It's not like GMs don't ever add marginally better players.

 

I'm not looking for anything in return. We could even do an Ottavinoe type trade or two to lessen the amount of money we'd pay:

 

Richards and Rosario for $2M or less in salary relief.

 

Perez, Wilson and Potts for $1.5M or less in salary relief.

Community Moderator
Posted
Seriously WTF is Chaim waiting for This guy is getting OWNED in this trade deadline FFS .

 

How many teams have more wins this year than the Sox?

Community Moderator
Posted
Are you this dense?????? So we don’t need to upgrade 1B ? Shut the f*** up,

 

How many teams have more wins this year than the Sox?

Posted
I would love scherzer but i hate giving up the farm for a guy that’s 37. His age should come into play when it comes to trading big time prospects. You’re basically trading young guys for a great old guy.
Community Moderator
Posted
I would love scherzer but i hate giving up the farm for a guy that’s 37. His age should come into play when it comes to trading big time prospects. You’re basically trading young guys for a great old guy.

 

And he can veto any trade. He probably won't come here because he's demanding an extension. Better to let him get traded and try to sign him in FA this offseason? I guess it just depends on the prospect package. Not sure Downs does it.

Posted

Swihat Ghost needs to quit watching the Titanic. Not every ship goes down....

 

But I am THE one that freaked out about Kike leading off......geez what was I thinking?

Posted

Who wants Richards and or Perez (as long as we pay a sizable chunk of their deal?

 

Mets have 5 pitchers on the 60 day IL and 1 on the 10 day.

Phillies have Eflin on the IL and their bottom 3 starters are:

Velazquez 5.54/1.431, M Moore 6.46/1.652, C Anderson 6.98/1.550.

Braves have 4 guys on the IL and some sketchy starters.

Dodgers need starters, but they won't go that low.

The A's just added Jesus Luzardo 6.87/1.632.

The Mariners might see an upgrade, since they have 2 guys over 5.48.

Posted
I'm betting Bloom trades for a first baseman not named Rizzo or it would have been done by now. I think Moon is right and that we trade away assets not intended for 2022 to get salary relief. In addition, I don't think he gets Scherzer, but instead goes for a solid reliever.
Posted
Cole gave up 8 runs today.....He still looks good to me but he can be scored on....

 

Funny how the rays decided to show up today but not the first two games.

Posted
Scherzer's last Nats start:

 

6 IP

3 hits

1 ER

3 BB

5 Ks

 

Probably and hopefully west coast bound.

 

I agree, he would look really good on the west coast!

Posted
Scherzer's last Nats start:

 

6 IP

3 hits

1 ER

3 BB

5 Ks

 

Probably and hopefully west coast bound.

 

Just hope it ain’t the dodgers. Sick of them already.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Seriously WTF is Chaim waiting for This guy is getting OWNED in this trade deadline FFS .

 

Not like he can make trades all by himself…

Posted
Cole gave up 8 runs today.....He still looks good to me but he can be scored on....

 

He's not the same since the crackdown. He's had some Cole-like games, but his overall numbers are nowhere near as good.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
If Wheeler was available i would give up the prospects. Not sure with scherzer.

 

Philadelphia is not out of anything.

 

Their remaining schedule is relatively easy and Fangraphs has them winning the NL East…

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Per Rotoworld, the Padres are close on Scherzer…

 

And Anthony Franco of MLBTR scooped me by mere seconds on this…

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...