Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Community Moderator
Posted

Mookie missed Saturday's game for a scheduled rest day, and yesterday's game due to shoulder soreness.

 

That makes 3 different injury issues he's had already this season.

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Community Moderator
Posted
Verdugo’s stays this year are a little better then Bett’s stats, but for a fraction of the cost!

 

Do you think that will continue for the next decade?

Community Moderator
Posted
Red Sox fans and media are a tough bunch. They have very little tolerance for underperformance, whether it's injury-related or just a slump. Maybe that's something Mookie was thinking about when he resisted signing the big deal with the Sox.
Posted
Red Sox fans and media are a tough bunch. They have very little tolerance for underperformance, whether it's injury-related or just a slump. Maybe that's something Mookie was thinking about when he resisted signing the big deal with the Sox.

 

It's like this for most big market teams.

Posted
Do you think that will continue for the next decade?

 

Only time will tell but in terms of value Betts won't be worth the price for at least half the portion of this contract. Name me an outfielder who was successful after turning 30 who was built for speed. And don't say Rickey Henderson. Even he declined when he hit 30. And it wasn't a small decline either

Posted
Only time will tell but in terms of value Betts won't be worth the price for at least half the portion of this contract. Name me an outfielder who was successful after turning 30 who was built for speed. And don't say Rickey Henderson. Even he declined when he hit 30. And it wasn't a small decline either

 

I wouldn’t say Betts is just “built for speed.” If he wasn’t fast we might be comping him with Aaron or Mays

Posted

This has been said numerous times, but I think it needs to be said again, there is no way we’ll ever know if he would have re-signed with us.

 

The trade was officially for one year of Betts, and it turned out to be a 60 game season lost.

Community Moderator
Posted
This has been said numerous times, but I think it needs to be said again, there is no way we’ll ever know if he would have re-signed with us.

 

The trade was officially for one year of Betts, and it turned out to be a 60 game season lost.

 

It also turned out that the same pandemic that turned it into a 60 game season may have heavily influenced Mookie's decision to take the Dodgers' offer.

Posted

I'm actually ambivalent about Mookie's performance going forward. I don't wish him bad tidings in any way, but I'm also not interested in rooting for him to perform at a high standard. He's just not a Red Sox player anymore. But I'll never get over the fact that Boston traded its best homegrown player in a half century when he was 27 years old.

 

It would certainly help fans move on if someday, Mookie or a family member admits that he wasn't going to re-sign in Beantown because he didn't want to play the rest of his career in New England. It would be a lot easier to accept, and make Bloom and Henry look even better with what they were able to get in return from LA (which already surpasses most superstar salary dumps). Plus, the deal also allowed the Sox to axe Price.

Community Moderator
Posted
It would certainly help fans move on if someday, Mookie or a family member admits that he wasn't going to re-sign in Beantown because he didn't want to play the rest of his career in New England. It would be a lot easier to accept, and make Bloom and Henry look even better with what they were able to get in return from LA (which already surpasses most superstar salary dumps).

 

I don't think you'll ever hear Mookie say that even if it's true. He's got too much savvy and class to do that. He knows no good would come of it.

Posted
I don't think you'll ever hear Mookie say that even if it's true. He's got too much savvy and class to do that. He knows no good would come of it.

 

...maybe when he's older, maybe when/if he becomes more outspoken; reasons for wanting to leave don't all have to revolve around social issues, but could just be weather-related (as was rumored).

 

Betts doesn't look to be a player who returns to Boston after his playing career as an announcer or ambassador (like a lot of ex-Red Sox) -- he won't miss the adulation, which he already has in LA, and certainly won't need the money. Then again, who would have ever thought Rice would become part of the media?

Posted
It also turned out that the same pandemic that turned it into a 60 game season may have heavily influenced Mookie's decision to take the Dodgers' offer.

 

Yes, and we also did not have to pay $16M to Price.

Community Moderator
Posted
Yes, and we also did not have to pay $16M to Price.

 

Which shaved a little fraction off the team's massive financial losses from the pandemic. Not much of a cause for celebration.

Posted
Which shaved a little fraction off the team's massive financial losses from the pandemic. Not much of a cause for celebration.

 

No, but $16M is a lot of money.

 

I doubt it affects how Henry plans to open his wallet 2 years later, but it doesn't hurt.

 

Losing Pedey's contract will help.

 

Here's another look at next winter's finances:

 

Contracts expiring (or options/opt outs where noted) in Lux Tax Dollars:

 

$22.0M JD (opt out)

$13.8M Pedey

$10.0M Richards (team option)

$8.9M Ottavino

$8.3M Rodriguez

$5.0M Perez (team option)

$4.5M Barnes

$4.5M Vazquez (team option w $500K buy out)

$3.0M Gonzalez

$2.8M Beni

$1.9M Andriese (team option with $250K buy out)

Major/minor Santana

 

After 2022 (all option players kept listed above, including JD, Richards, Perez and Vazquez):

$20M Bogaerts (opt out)

$17M Eovaldi

$16M Price

$7.0M Kike Hernandez

4th arb Plawecki

$1.2M Sawamura (team option with $600K buy out)

 

 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
A year ago, a JD opt out felt like a fantasy. But after the way he got started this year, it’s looking pretty likely. Especially with only one year left if he doesn’t...
Posted

Remember the return for Mookie = Verdugo + Jeter Downs.

 

You could add in how the spend the cash Mookie is getting now, but that will be almost impossible to quantify over the next several years.

Community Moderator
Posted
A year ago, a JD opt out felt like a fantasy. But after the way he got started this year, it’s looking pretty likely. Especially with only one year left if he doesn’t...

 

34 year old DH's don't typically command a big pay check. Guys like Edwin Encarnacion and Nelson Cruz were more likely to get 1-2 year deals each offseason.

Posted
Remember the return for Mookie = Verdugo + Jeter Downs.

 

You could add in how the spend the cash Mookie is getting now, but that will be almost impossible to quantify over the next several years.

 

It is impossible to quantify, but you can figure we'll get a few players every year as the "offset."

 

Also, don't forget the mighty Connor Wong!

Posted
34 year old DH's don't typically command a big pay check. Guys like Edwin Encarnacion and Nelson Cruz were more likely to get 1-2 year deals each offseason.

 

And Cruz only got $13M per.

Community Moderator
Posted
And Cruz only got $13M per.

 

Maybe JD would get an offer of 3/45, but does that surpass what he'd get if he stuck around? He'd get 19.35 year 1, go to FA and get 2/30ish?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
34 year old DH's don't typically command a big pay check. Guys like Edwin Encarnacion and Nelson Cruz were more likely to get 1-2 year deals each offseason.

 

Cruz got a 4 year/$57 mill deal from Seattle at age 34...

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Maybe JD would get an offer of 3/45, but does that surpass what he'd get if he stuck around? He'd get 19.35 year 1, go to FA and get 2/30ish?

 

Again, if he gets a deal like Nelson Cruz got at the same age, he gets more money and years. And at his age, he might prioritize years over money...

Old-Timey Member
Posted
At 14AAV. You think JD would take that?

 

He might. If guaranteed years mean more to him than salary.

 

The biggest factor will be what his agent tells him he can get him.

 

Also not sure why you think a $14mill AAV is insulting and then think a $15mill AAV should do the trick...

Community Moderator
Posted
No, but $16M is a lot of money.

 

It was only $6 million saved for 2020 because of the pro-rating.

 

Sorry, but bean-counters gonna bean-count.

Community Moderator
Posted
Again, if he gets a deal like Nelson Cruz got at the same age, he gets more money and years. And at his age, he might prioritize years over money...

 

This is assuming that he makes $0 after 2022 if he keeps the 19.35. Maybe he bets on himself and realizes that he could still probably get 14AAV after 2022?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...