Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
I thought the same thing. This guy is always hurt. He's worse than Buchholz.

 

Unless he can offer some tips on recovery or knows some really good doctors...

  • Replies 5.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I thought the same thing. This guy is always hurt. He's worse than Buchholz.

 

Oh yikes you guys are right. I hadn't followed him last year. Only 13 starts and 58 innings. But at least his ERA was still 2.45. I guess it all depends on the expense. For a $2 million pick up he's worth a flyer.

Posted
Oh yikes you guys are right. I hadn't followed him last year. Only 13 starts and 58 innings. But at least his ERA was still 2.45. I guess it all depends on the expense. For a $2 million pick up he's worth a flyer.

 

We might be tight on every dollar.

 

He really does not offer us the two things we might need:

 

1) A bridge to 2021 player

2) A longer term player as part of the rebuilding

 

A third could be added: Innings needed.

Posted

The Fall soxprospects.com rankings are out:

 

https://soxprospects.com

 

(Note: Chavis & DHern graduated, so + 2 is essentially staying even)

 

1. Casas

2. Mata +8 from April

3. Groome +3

4. Jimenez +12

5. Dalbec -1

6. Duran +7

7. Houck -2

8. Noah Song (NR)

9. Chatham -1

10. T Ward (NR)

11. R Zeferajahn (NR)

12. Aldo Ramirez (NR)

13. Matthew Lugo (NR)

14. Chris Murphey (NR)

15. N Decker -3

16. Cameron Cannon (NR)

17. Brayan Bello (NR)

18. Antoni Flores -11

19. Ceddanne Rafaela (NR)

20. Marcus Wilson (NR)

 

Other notables:

24. Feltman

27. Shawaryn

32. Fitzgerald

42. D Reyes

45. Ockimey

52. K Hart

58. Yusniel Padron-Artiles

 

 

 

Posted
Imagine how high Groome will be ranked when he actually pitches!!

 

I see two possibilities:

 

1) Our farm is so weak, we have to put a totally unproven, operated on player in our 3 slot.

 

2) He is really good and just need to prove it.

Posted
He has a 98mph fastball. That might get him to #3...

 

I'm sure that's part of the potential calculation.

 

I hope they are right. We could use a SP'er from the farm. It's been a while.

Posted

My top 10 (not that I know more than soxprospects.com):

1. Casas

2. Mata

3. Ward

4. Dalbec

5. Jimenez

6. Groome

7. Chatham

8. Houck

9. Song

10. Padron-Artiles

 

 

Posted
That just can't be true. Show me that data.

 

(Look, I mentioned wins are not necessarily the best way to set the true rankings of who were the best teams making the playoffs, but the numbers I presented alone, shows a very cleat correlation between season wins and postseason wins. The numbers are clear.)

 

Your numbers do not show a very clear correlation. You posted some anecdotal data to support your opinion. Showing a statistical correlation is a different story.

 

The factor that has the highest correlation to post season wins is regular season wins, but even that correlation is pretty weak.

 

We will have to agree to disagree on this.

Posted
Luck does play a role, and sometimes teams that played poorly most of the year get it together or make a big trade and actually get better than their record indicates, but the larger aspect of who wins is who is better.

 

The better teams have a better chance of winning a 5 or 7 game series.

 

Luck plays a larger role in a short series, including 5 or 7 games, than I think most people realize. Yes, talent and skill are important too, but when you're talking about one series, randomness often trumps anything else.

Posted
No, I agree that randomness is a big factor.

 

I just think saying it's all luck once you get to the playoffs is overstating it.

 

No, it's not all luck. But it's enough luck that it trumps talent.

Posted
Your numbers do not show a very clear correlation. You posted some anecdotal data to support your opinion. Showing a statistical correlation is a different story.

 

The factor that has the highest correlation to post season wins is regular season wins, but even that correlation is pretty weak.

 

We will have to agree to disagree on this.

 

I never said the winningest teams always win, but there is a clear correaltion, and it's not "anecdotal evidence."

 

You can argue my sample size is too small, maybe, but I am trying to capture the state of MLB today not many years ago.

 

Go ahead and throw out the wild card game and make it the top 4 vs the bottom 4, and if it was a pure "crap shoot" (not that you are saying it is a 100% crap shoot), you'd expect something close to a 50% break down of WS attendees and winners.

 

66% of the teams that go to the WS are top 4. That's is pretty far from 50-50. Yes, it's closer to 50-50 than 100-0, but it is clearly a significant correlation.

 

The 73% winning it all number, which could be 75%, if the Astros win this year is what I was really arguing, and winning it all is very far from a crap shoot.

 

73% (11 of the last 15) is a very clear correlation.

 

Posted
Luck plays a larger role in a short series, including 5 or 7 games, than I think most people realize. Yes, talent and skill are important too, but when you're talking about one series, randomness often trumps anything else.

 

Who knew Andrew Luck was so influential?

Posted
He has a 98mph fastball. That might get him to #3...

 

He moved up from #7 to #3 while pitching just 4 IP the last 2 years.

 

True, Chavis & DHern graduated, but still.

 

My point was more about the lack of other prospects looking good enough to pass him or just stay ahead of him, where they were before the season started.

 

We had some guys move up that show promise, but nobody that is getting the attention of national ranking services.

 

Thaddeus Ward

Gilberto Jimenez

Noah Song

(Mata moved up from #10 to #2.)

 

I'm trying to be optimistic, but it's not easy.

 

Posted

Possible Free Agents This Winter

 

WWW.MLB.COM

Although a number of star players signed contract extensions before the 2019 season commenced instead of testing the open market this offseason, the current free-agent class still included many interesting names. Below, you'll find the list of this year's crop of notable free agents. The list will be updated throughout
Posted
Possible Free Agents This Winter

 

WWW.MLB.COM

Although a number of star players signed contract extensions before the 2019 season commenced instead of testing the open market this offseason, the current free-agent class still included many interesting names. Below, you'll find the list of this year's crop of notable free agents. The list will be updated throughout

 

Assuming JD opts out and they (somehow) get rid of JBJ, how much money can they spend? I ask before I start posting ridiculous things like, "Hey, Anthony Rendon is available!"

Posted
Assuming JD opts out and they (somehow) get rid of JBJ, how much money can they spend? I ask before I start posting ridiculous things like, "Hey, Anthony Rendon is available!"

 

we wont sign anyone this offseason. at least not anyone you rate as A+ quality. we are resetting. look for 2020 offseason for spending.

Posted
That rarely happens.

 

Pedro stays in longer than most think he should. He throws a good pitch to Posada who barely makes contact and gets a bloop hit to center. Had Pedro's pitch been a bit worse, and had Posada made decent contact, it would have been a lazy fly-ball to center and Grady Little would have been hailed a genius. As it was, he got fired ...

Posted
Pedro stays in longer than most think he should. He throws a good pitch to Posada who barely makes contact and gets a bloop hit to center. Had Pedro's pitch been a bit worse, and had Posada made decent contact, it would have been a lazy fly-ball to center and Grady Little would have been hailed a genius. As it was, he got fired ...

 

I have set up a new thread for the 'playoffs are a crapshoot' topic.

Posted
Pedro stays in longer than most think he should. He throws a good pitch to Posada who barely makes contact and gets a bloop hit to center. Had Pedro's pitch been a bit worse, and had Posada made decent contact, it would have been a lazy fly-ball to center and Grady Little would have been hailed a genius. As it was, he got fired ...

 

not to mention the 2 hr's by the now admitted juicer giambi that barely cleared the wall. no juice = flyouts.

that 2003 ALCS was a complete cheat job by NYY.

but it made 2004 that much sweeter....

Posted
we wont sign anyone this offseason. at least not anyone you rate as A+ quality. we are resetting. look for 2020 offseason for spending.

 

It seems like we're always waiting to shed bad contracts. First it was Beckett and Crawford. Then after we ditched them, we took on the Ramirez and Sandoval contracts. Now we're (probably) stuck until the Price & Sale contracts end.

Posted
It seems like we're always waiting to shed bad contracts. First it was Beckett and Crawford. Then after we ditched them, we took on the Ramirez and Sandoval contracts. Now we're (probably) stuck until the Price & Sale contracts end.

 

Price’s contract is pretty awful.

 

Although if you use the trade values on baseballtradevalues.com, he could theoretically be dealt straight up for Chris Davis or Wil Myers. Both have lower AAV’s than Price, but Davis is the unquestioned worst player in MLB.

 

Myers, on the other hand, actually makes sense. His AAV is $18mill less than Price’s, and he’s owed $30mill less overall. And, depending on the fates of Bradley and Betts, the Sox are likely to need outfielders, and have none in the minors that can step in. And San Diego has a glut of outfielders, but apparently is hoping to add a veteran SP to go with their inexperienced rotation.

 

Price for Myers. Book it...

Posted
Assuming JD opts out and they (somehow) get rid of JBJ, how much money can they spend? I ask before I start posting ridiculous things like, "Hey, Anthony Rendon is available!"

 

Getting rid of JBJ would put us just under the line, so the $22M saved on JD would be the spending budget, unless we dump more salary somewhere else.

Posted
Pedro stays in longer than most think he should. He throws a good pitch to Posada who barely makes contact and gets a bloop hit to center. Had Pedro's pitch been a bit worse, and had Posada made decent contact, it would have been a lazy fly-ball to center and Grady Little would have been hailed a genius. As it was, he got fired ...

 

I've never faulted Grady for that choice.

 

Pedro was the best pitcher the Sox ever had. I'll take him at 75% than anyone else.

Posted (edited)
I've never faulted Grady for that choice.

 

Pedro was the best pitcher the Sox ever had. I'll take him at 75% than anyone else.

 

Not to mention, the Sox bullpen was their main problem that entire season, and the brief turnaround of Timlin in the postseason should not have erased that fact.

 

Leaving Pedro in was probably the smartest choice at the time...

Edited by notin

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...