Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
My view of the use of emotion is that it should help the player relax and have fun and that is the best way to maximize performance.

 

Relaxation is one way to maximize performance but inducing stress is another. I've seen a graph regarding stress vs. performance in the workplace. The two rise in almost parallel lines until the "breaking point" is reached and then performance drops off remarkedly. The ability to self-induce stress can be a very good thing as long as the person can recognize where his breaking point is.

  • Replies 293
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Well, he did look pretty good Wednesday night, so it's not all doom and gloom.

 

He's looked real good pretty much every other start for 10 games.

 

I guess that's good enough for most posters.

Posted
Relaxation is one way to maximize performance but inducing stress is another. I've seen a graph regarding stress vs. performance in the workplace. The two rise in almost parallel lines until the "breaking point" is reached and then performance drops off remarkedly. The ability to self-induce stress can be a very good thing as long as the person can recognize where his breaking point is.

 

But is the stress causing the performance or correlated with it?

Posted
Well, he did look pretty good Wednesday night, so it's not all doom and gloom.

 

It is somewhat unknown territory with Sale since his end of season performances have not meant much to his prior team. But yes, he is not doomed to perform poorly, despite what past statistics suggest.

Posted
But is the stress causing the performance or correlated with it?

 

The stress is causing the improved performance.

 

What I learned in an HR seminar was the the more stress there is on an employee from any source the better their performance will be ,... until they crash.

 

I was appalled at how cold blooded it was.

Posted
The stress is causing the improved performance.

 

What I learned in an HR seminar was the the more stress there is on an employee from any source the better their performance will be ,... until they crash.

 

I was appalled at how cold blooded it was.

 

And this article says otherwise. So what is correct?

 

https://www.forbes.com/workplace-stress-leads-to-less-productive-employees

Posted
And this article says otherwise. So what is correct?

 

https://www.forbes.com/workplace-stress-leads-to-less-productive-employees

 

I have no idea which is "right" but this one from Harvard University says exactly what I said:

 

According to what is known as “The Yerkes-Dodson law,” performance increases with physiological or mental arousal (stress) but only up to a point. When the level of stress becomes too high, performance decreases.

 

 

https://hbr.org/2016/04/are-you-too-stressed-to-be-productive-or-not-stressed-enough

Posted
I have no idea which is "right" but this one from Harvard University says exactly what I said:

 

According to what is known as “The Yerkes-Dodson law,” performance increases with physiological or mental arousal (stress) but only up to a point. When the level of stress becomes too high, performance decreases.

 

 

https://hbr.org/2016/04/are-you-too-stressed-to-be-productive-or-not-stressed-enough

 

This makes perfect sense, really. A certain amount of stress is a good thing. You often hear about athletes having nerves or 'butterflies' before competition as a natural consequence of their systems getting ready to perform.

Posted
I have no idea which is "right" but this one from Harvard University says exactly what I said:

 

According to what is known as “The Yerkes-Dodson law,” performance increases with physiological or mental arousal (stress) but only up to a point. When the level of stress becomes too high, performance decreases.

 

 

https://hbr.org/2016/04/are-you-too-stressed-to-be-productive-or-not-stressed-enough

 

So the problem is defining what stress really means.

Posted
I have no idea which is "right" but this one from Harvard University says exactly what I said:

 

According to what is known as “The Yerkes-Dodson law,” performance increases with physiological or mental arousal (stress) but only up to a point. When the level of stress becomes too high, performance decreases.

 

 

https://hbr.org/2016/04/are-you-too-stressed-to-be-productive-or-not-stressed-enough

 

From your linked article:

 

Similarly, research in sports psychology demonstrates the performance benefits of pre-performance routines, from improving attention and execution to increasing emotional stability and confidence. And recently, my colleagues and I have found that when people engage in rituals before undertaking high-stakes tasks, they feel less anxious and stressed about the task and end up performing better as a result.
Posted
So the problem is defining what stress really means.

 

No, the problem is what I've been saying all along. That if someone wants to "prove" something they can find a study or the stats to "prove" it.

Posted
Toronto and the Rays always play us and the Yankees tough. I'm not saying the Yankees schedule is not easier than ours for the rest of the month, but I doubt they win out.

 

This guy knows what he's talking about.

 

Seriously though, if anyone thinks that resting Sale would hurt the chances of the Sox winning the division, just remember that Sale has 17 wins, which means the Sox have won 72 games while Chris Sale was sitting on the bench picking his nose or whatever pitchers do when they aren't pitching. Playing Candy Crush?

Posted

Seriously though, if anyone thinks that resting Sale would hurt the chances of the Sox winning the division, just remember that Sale has 17 wins, which means the Sox have won 72 games while Chris Sale was sitting on the bench picking his nose or whatever pitchers do when they aren't pitching. Playing Candy Crush?

 

Now that you mention it, the Sox are 22-9 in Sale starts (71%) and 67-55 in non-Sale starts (55%).

Posted (edited)
I wanted Sale to start that game against the Birds because I felt it significantly enhanced our chances to win the game. If we lost the game the Yanks would be only 2 back with 10 to go. I did not want them to have any more chance than they had already did. Don't f*** around. It's pretty simple...it's not North Korean rocket science. Edited by Bellhorn04
Posted
I wanted Sale to start that game against the Birds because I felt it significantly enhanced our chances to win the game. If we lost the game the Yanks would be only 2 back with 10 to go. I did not want them to have any more chance than they had already did. Don't f*** around. It's pretty simple...it's not North Korean rocket science.

 

Not starting Sale last go sounds crackpot to me. Pulling him early because we had such a lead sounds like it could have been a good idea, I'm fairly on the fence with letting him go 100 plus pitches. I still think the biggest drawback to not pulling Sale was not getting Price in the game and getting him work.

Posted
Not starting Sale last go sounds crackpot to me. Pulling him early because we had such a lead sounds like it could have been a good idea, I'm fairly on the fence with letting him go 100 plus pitches. I still think the biggest drawback to not pulling Sale was not getting Price in the game and getting him work.

 

Keeping Price back another game worked out pretty good too.

Posted
Keeping Price back another game worked out pretty good too.

 

Well, there's that.

 

How long can Price go? He's only had short stints. Can he go like 60 pitches or 80 or 100? Why aren't we thinking of him as a starter?

Posted
Well, there's that.

 

How long can Price go? He's only had short stints. Can he go like 60 pitches or 80 or 100? Why aren't we thinking of him as a starter?

 

He was out of action for almost 2 months. He threw 21 pitches Sept 17 and 40 last night. Probably not enough time to ramp up to much more than 50 pitches. Farrell sounds pretty excited about having him available to pitch multiple innings out of the pen.

Posted
He was out of action for almost 2 months. He threw 21 pitches Sept 17 and 40 last night. Probably not enough time to ramp up to much more than 50 pitches. Farrell sounds pretty excited about having him available to pitch multiple innings out of the pen.

 

I'm excited the way he's looked.

Posted
He was out of action for almost 2 months. He threw 21 pitches Sept 17 and 40 last night. Probably not enough time to ramp up to much more than 50 pitches. Farrell sounds pretty excited about having him available to pitch multiple innings out of the pen.

 

Big if, but if the Sox make it to the WS, he could be near full strength by then, no? With side-sessions included of course.

Posted
Well, there's that.

 

How long can Price go? He's only had short stints. Can he go like 60 pitches or 80 or 100? Why aren't we thinking of him as a starter?

 

I would be thinking of him as a starter, replacing the guy who has more losses this year than any other pitcher in the league.

Posted (edited)
I would be thinking of him as a starter, replacing the guy who has more losses this year than any other pitcher in the league.

 

I don't know how many pitches he ramped up to during his recovery. If he can only go 50 pitches, I go with E-Rod and have Price waiting in case there is trouble. I'd rather have a guy that looks like he is cruising keep cruising to start, instead of a guy you know you have to pull in a few innings.

 

Just the crazy part to this whole thing, is this is the best I've seen Price pitch...

Edited by SoxHop
Posted
Well, there's that.

 

How long can Price go? He's only had short stints. Can he go like 60 pitches or 80 or 100? Why aren't we thinking of him as a starter?

 

Then, there's this....

 

Had Price pitched 2 days earlier, maybe that might have helped accelerate his build up to 60-80 pitches a little more quickly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...