Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Signing Lackey' date=' trying to extend Beckett, offering a deal to Chapman, this isn't the cheap ass Theo I'm accustomed to![/quote']

 

Theo has never been cheap. He's just been occasionally outbid -- an occupational hazard when we're not the only big market around.

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Not really, considering who usually does the outbidding. ANYONE looks cheap if they're compared directly to the Yankees.
Posted
The only time Theo wasn't cheap was when he made two terrible signings for guys he had hard-ons for- Drew and Lugo, and look how both of them have turned out.
Posted

i'll give you Lugo, but Drew has been one of the staples of the team -- one of our best players, actually. Especially over the last two years.

 

As for Lugo, well, I think we're just going to have to accept that when it comes to shortstops, Theo is guessing. But that has nothing to do with cheap. That has to do with not knowing how to handle staffing a position.

 

Besides, he's been quite generous in locking down our young talent. That counts for something. Because before you can be accused of being cheap you have to have players available that are actually worth paying for. Other than a couple guys we missed out on because the Yankees were determined not to be beaten on them, I can't think of too many times Theo hasn't gotten his man.

Posted
Lugo is a given, and Drew is up for debate, lets not get into that again because we know where that will lead too... anyway, Theo does deserve credit for giving players like Beckett, Pedrioa, Youkilis there extensions early on to keep their costs relaively low compared to their value on the FA market. But to be real blunt, he has never really made a big free agent signing during his time here. He has pulled off some great trades a signed some great talent off of the scrap heaps, but he hasn't brought in a high priced effective guy. Lugo was a bust, Drew has been plagued by criticism since he got here. Dice-K hasn't lived upt to all that money that was posted for him. Schilling, Beckett, V-Mart, Bay were all brought here through trades. Youk, Peds, Ellsbury, Papelbon, Lester were all prospects in the Sox farm system. The only huge contract on the payroll was Manny Rameriz's, and that contract was a holdover from the Duquette era which Theo would constantly try to unload.
Posted
But to be real blunt, he has never really made a big free agent signing during his time here.

 

http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/DaisukeMatsuzaka97219479_Yankees_v_Red_Sox.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3007/2656902665_427a476098.jpg

http://imagecache5.art.com/p/LRG/12/1248/QC1T000Z/matt-clement--05-pitching-action.jpg

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/19/23591202_49d0c87114.jpg

Would you care to revise that statement?

Posted
If you read I said he picked up some talent off the scrap heaps, example Ortiz, Mueller, guys that had talent that didn't cost a lot. Mueller wasn't the everyday guy reguarly until Hillenbrand was traded for BK Kim in 03. Matt Clement? That was a a huge FA signing and that guy was good for half a year anyway. You really think Dice-K has lived up to all the hype?
Posted

And why not? There is no law that all big free agent signings are successful, is there? Just because a guy bombed bigtime here, whether through his own fault or not, doesn't mean we didn't take a risk on him. That's revisionist thinking, and it's actually quite sloppy.

 

Theo operates through trades, acquires veterans for excess rookies, and develops his own players, supplementing from free agency mostly as a Plan C. When he really needs to, he's not afraid to spend, it's just not his first option. This is not a bad thing, especially when you're competing against a team that can really screw with you in free agency. And if you're willing to take on salary to bring a quality player, that should allay the accusations of cheapness anyway.

 

Besides, among the big free agents we signed are several players who have hit free agency and been re-upped. Schilling and Lowell probably most recently. That counts, as we wouldn't have kept them otherwise.

Posted
Now you're adding another conditional that was never there in your initial statement. There is no iron law that a big name talent has to pay off. And since Theo has said, practically in so many words, that free agency is his talent source of last resort, I'm honestly not sure why you expected there to be too many examples of him going there.
Posted

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/dan_shaughnessy/12/14/sox.yanks/index.html?eref=sihp

 

Good article, not sure where to put it. I know fans are split into two camps now but I honestly don't get why we wouldn't trade two to three out of Jose Iglesias, Ryan Kalish, Ryan Westmorland, Casey Kelly, Lars Anderson, Tazawa, Bowden. Why are people so confidante that these guys are going to be so good that it isn't worth trading them to get a stud third basemen who is young and entering his prime. I had this argument about Dojji last year, who cares about Lars Anderson (not that, that was the sole reason we didnt get him) when you have a sure thing in Tex?

Posted

Actually I think it's more the opposite. We aren't that confident in these rookies, all hope notwithstanding. During that conversation I think you'll recall that I admitted that the possibility of Anderson collapsing was there, but that we'd have plenty of opportunities to fill that hole another way should that happen. One of the ways you do that is with redundant depth of prospects. It's one of the reasons I'm glad Anthony Rizzo, for example, is hitting well too.

 

Anywho, point being, once upon a time this team had two dynamite top 3B prospects -- Jeff Bagwell and Scott Cooper. They both looked good, so we decided we could spare one. I think you just might remember how that one turned out for us.

Posted

Right, but 1B isn't exactly the only position we'll need to replace in the next 3 years either.

 

I'm not saying trade no one. I'm just saying a certain conservatism is in order.

Posted

You know what's really funny?

 

Dipre must be DYING to get his two cents worth in here. The biggest more the Red Sox have made since 2007...and he leaves a few days before.

 

I'm annoyed you got Lackey, but at least it came with a silver lining.

Posted

I can just picture you tooling around in your cab grinning your fool head off.

 

You need to learn to let this stuff go. You'll stay saner.

Posted
RedSox.com is reporting that they have made an offer to Chapman. I'm on my Blackberry with bad access. Is that a new development

 

It's been posted but yes, it was just reported today. $15.5 million total, though I'm not sure about years.

Posted
RedSox.com is reporting that they have made an offer to Chapman. I'm on my Blackberry with bad access. Is that a new development

 

They offered that before he hired his new agent and Hendricks said his client was not accepting offers at the time so who knows.

Posted
RedSox.com is reporting that they have made an offer to Chapman. I'm on my Blackberry with bad access. Is that a new development

 

Not really. So far, the Red Sox have made the only offer.

 

I don't know about Lackey and Burnett. Lackey is definitely the more consistent pitcher, but Burnett has more talent. If I had to choose, I'd probably go with Lackey...but not by much.

 

Let's see what Cashman has up his sleeve. So far, he's been outmanuevered by Theo. We added Granderson for pretty much nothing, but Lackey and Scutaro were by far bigger transitions, and the Sox have all of their depth to deal.

Posted
In fairness to Cashman, the Sox have more needs to address than the Yankees. But Lackey is definitely better than Burnett. Burnett may have better stuff, but he also has worse command and historically has been less durable.
Posted
Not really. So far, the Red Sox have made the only offer.

 

I don't know about Lackey and Burnett. Lackey is definitely the more consistent pitcher, but Burnett has more talent. If I had to choose, I'd probably go with Lackey...but not by much.

 

Let's see what Cashman has up his sleeve. So far, he's been outmanuevered by Theo. We added Granderson for pretty much nothing, but Lackey and Scutaro were by far bigger transitions, and the Sox have all of their depth to deal.

 

Granderson for Austin Jackson and Ian Kennedy isn't nothing but it's surely better than giving up Hughes or Chamberlain.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...