Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    52,203
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. And if the second offers comes through and looks a whole lot better, he’ll perk up. In the meantime, maybe his agent can explain how negotiations work and that he (the agent) will take care of this…
  2. I have no problems with the Sox offering 4 years $90 mill, as long as it’s not their final offer. But at a minimum, Bogaerts is going to command Marcus Semien money, and he might be looking for (and might even get) something a bit closer to Corey Seager money…
  3. Beckett was never a free agent. Extensions are a different matter since the player can only negotiate with one team…
  4. Lackey and Eovaldi are both showing your legacy is not in how you do at the start of the deal but rather in how you finish…
  5. This. Who was the last free agent pitcher the Sox signed to a long term multi year deal that worked out? Besides Eovaldi, who was a returning free agent and only took a tactically safe 4 year deal…
  6. This off-season? Probably Edwin Diaz. Reliever free agent deals are typically less risky. For a top tier starter, the trade market is a better way to go..
  7. So Sale won’t be lonely on the IL?
  8. Pannone’s brief MLB career is not littered with success. He’s the type of pitcher whose career was jeopardized by the 3-batter minimum rule, because without it he might have been able to patch together a decent LOOGY career. He kind of reminds me of Brian Shouse…
  9. He’s been around. I’m pretty sure I mentioned him at some point in the long dormant “Fun with Baseball Names” thread…
  10. And if he can limit his meltdowns to games where the Sox have big leads late, not a big deal…
  11. Or just non-tendered him. But I liked this deal when it was made and think it will work out just fine in the long and short runs…
  12. Actually I never mentioned his ERA. Just where he ranked. I do prefer a 3 year timeframe because career numbers can include numbers from 5, 10, or maybe 15 years ago that are just not relevant anymore. Of course, the problem with looking at 3 years now is 2020 and it’s lack of data…
  13. That stretch does include some of the worst years for Nate…
  14. Of course if we had not dealt for Bradley, we’d still have Renfroe’s salary ($7.7 milll this year) too…
  15. Since the 2018 season, ERod ranks 71st in ERA among qualified pitchers. Eovaldi ranks 75th…
  16. Like back in the early 1900’s. Everything old is new again..
  17. The solution might eventually be to just play JBJ every day. It’s not like they acquired him for his bat…
  18. Perhaps he tried, but it’s a bit hard to deal Renfroe for an upgrade over Renfroe without taking on even more money…
  19. And that decision might involve demoting both Valdez and Crawford. Although a DFA of Austin Davis might be in the mix…
  20. Suzuki cost roughly half of Story. But Story had an MLB track record. But then it was a Coors Field track record. I’d have preferred Suzuki, partially because it made te Arroyo/Bradley platoon better defensively…
  21. So far this year the Sox offense has generated 13 runs. 8 of them in the first two innings…
  22. There’s a legit comp to Wade Boggs in that both players did nothing but hit for 6 minor league seasons yet neither was ever really considered much of a prospect…
  23. IMO they also never get old…
  24. Those were the teams that ignored the drum banging and paid for it dearly…
  25. I wonder if we’re reaching the end of the line with Brasier. Even 4 years ago, his 95mph heat was at least something. But now while it’s still his best pitch, he’s become one of the softest tossers in the bullpen…
×
×
  • Create New...