Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    54,596
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    53

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. They might have gotten him for much less. Don’t forget he was just months past being non-tendered and settling for a one year cheap deal on a s***** team…
  2. CC Sabathia was traded in June. He wasn’t disgruntled. In fact, many the pundit commented on exactly how gruntled he was…
  3. Had they extended Schwarber during the season, he might have been cheaper…
  4. Good point. I think May of 1984 might be too early to consider him a 1986 trade deadline acquisition. But that‘s me…
  5. He gets less exciting once you realize his first name is James…
  6. That was a weird transaction year for Schwarber. At age 28, he was: 1. non-tendered by the Cubs, 2. only able to get a 1 year $7mill deal with the Nationals 3. missed time with injuries 4. Got traded to Boston in July for some guy named Aldo Ramirez and then signed his first multiyear deal with Philly and took off from there…
  7. Buckner was acquired in late May. Sort of a gray area here. Not at the deadline, but certainly not in the off-season either. We need a ruling!
  8. I updated my post while you were typing. Yes he was already exposed to get away for nothing after 2024, and anyone (including Boston) could have selected him from St. Louis this past off-season. Drohan l got selected and returned and yet he was a mistake to trade…
  9. Jordan was also Rule 5 eligible after last season (also 2024, when he went unselected), so unless the Sox planned to keep him on the 40 man roster, he was going to be exposed to the draft again…
  10. Bill Buckner? I mean, the Sox did give up a Hall of Famer to get him…
  11. Run differential is probably still a pretty accurate predictor most of the time. But the Sox have a better different than the Padres, who have the same good staff and impotent offense and a much better record…
  12. Worst? Probably not. Most disappointing? Easily…
  13. Non-tendering is not an option. At lest not a smart one. The options are: 1. Trade in July 2. Trade in Dec/Jan 3. Keep.
  14. The question now with Duran - is this the nadir? Do you keep him and hope he looks like a better target in December/January?
  15. The Tyler Thornburg trade is eerily reminiscent of Breslow’s recent trades. Send a guy to Milwaukee (Travis Shaw) and watch him excel while the player you got back contributes very little…
  16. True, but Dalbec also debuted with a .959 OPS in 2020 after only 92 PAs. It didn’t last, obviously…
  17. If he settles in hitting .275-.300 with 15-20 HRs and questionable defense, he probably winds up being a lesser player than Durbin…
  18. If Harrison was here, he’d probably be mediocre at best. Not like he showed this kind of potential in 3 years at Oracle. I do think Harrison falls back a little bit and that trade winds up being fairly equal. (I assumed the swap of middle infielders - Hamilton for Monasterio - was due to Romy’s injury coupled with Monasterio’s numbers vs LHP last year.) I do agree dumping all of Dobbins, Fitts and Harrison felt like a depth killer, especially since i didn’t have the faith in Tyler Uberstine the Sox apparently had. I still don’t have any, either…
  19. Well, if they’re messing with his swing, I would expect that to impact him negatively. It seems like the obvious solution is to let him use the swing that got him to be a Minor League Player of the Year and AL Rookie of the Month. And to not panic over the occasional slump…
  20. So after one good month followed by one bad month, they decided “enough is enough” and made the call to tear the whole thing down? Sadly, thats very believable…
  21. No idea. I assume they were probably doing their usual “one size fits all” approach and someone said “hey, Jackie Bradley got much much better when we got him to stop tapping his toe! We should do that with Campbell, too!”
  22. The National guys that rank prospects didn’t mention it as a hole per se. They said, yes, his mechanics are unorthodox and much like Hunter Pence, but his batspeed, etc. made up for it. If the internal Sox people didn't like his swing, why extend him?
  23. I think that’s fair. Every MLB team uses Driveline, but not every MLB team sees their prospects struggle in the majors like Boston has…
  24. All I’m saying is after a handful of of PA and IP, guys like Buttrey, Moncada, Kopech, Beeks all looked good, too. But over time a lot of luster wore off most of them. Maybe the same happens to Jordan…
×
×
  • Create New...