Would you have preferred Greenwell? I lose some of my parallels that way, but Greenwell was the better player.
But I still think these trades are miles apart. When Sale got traded, the previous seasons at least made it easy to understand why. When Betts got traded, we knew the previous years had nothing to do with it except that they upped his cost. Betts' trad also came at the tail end of 3 years of failed negotiations for an extension. Sale's trade came at the end of 4 years of frequent IL trips.
When I look at those two players, I feared that when Bett's deal was coming to an end, it would mean he was trade bait. With Sale, it was getting to the point where I just wanted that deal to end. Just last year, some story broke about how Bloom turned down the chance to trade Sale and his entire contract for nothing. Pure salary dump. And Bloom turned it down because he was getting nothing in return. And a lot of people still blasted Bloom for not doing it. But they move Sale for a legitimate prospect, and Sale manages to not get injured for his first 8 starts, and suddenly this new trade is mentioned in the same sentence as the Mookie trade because minimal parallels can be drawn?
I think you're looking for hyperbole in the wrong place...