Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

jad

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,658

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by jad

  1. jad
    Disagree. I think cats are complete dumb-asses and PRETEND to be aloof to persuade you to think (wrongly) they're smart. Dogs, on the other hand, are completely secure in their intellectual abilities and only act like dumb-asses because they know you will reward them for it.
  2. jad
    I see occasional signs of feral cats here, but the local fishers apparently keep teh population in check.
  3. jad
    Damn, I HAD to look that up. (Being high might have spurred me on.). Most snakes have no problem--they just burrow--rattlesnakes in big snake-balls--YUCH. But pythons are vulnerable and start to shut down in anything under 50 degrees. Since they're tropical, I guess, they haven't evolved any obvious defenses--Hey, dude, how about like BURYING YOURSELF IN THE WARM EARTH? OK. I feel I've had enough intellectual advancement for one day.
  4. jad
    Wow that Devers trade keeps paying HUGE divedends.
  5. jad
    Ah yes, the ole 'bad team-mate' ploy. The only people who would know are other players, and I'm still waiting to hear a statement from any of them supporting this theory, as there were some (including Bregman) who flat out denied it.
  6. jad
    Bluffing? Posturing? Lines in the sand? No way. I, like most sports fans, believe in COMPLETE transparency and openness and trust that all organizations feel the same way. Not for one minute do I believe such dastardly things as you suggest go on in sports.
  7. jad
    Exactly. We would NEVER do such a thing. Nor would we offer more for a player who already had an offer o the table, because we believe in competitive balance and a level playing field would NEVER try to use our wealth to give us an advantage.
  8. jad
    Probably so. Because it's never us or 'our guys' who are responsible for strikes/lockouts in sports , nor for any other bad thing.
  9. jad
    i know. That's what made it so astounding. For a while, he was the ONLY mlb player drawing any kind of salary and hadn't been on the field for decades.
  10. jad
    Aristophanes
  11. jad

    NCAA Football

    jad replied to moonslav59's topic in Other Sports

    Yeah, college football is a mess. Why not form a blue-ribbon committee, say like the one for the nfl Hall of Fame, to come up with a solution.
  12. jad

    HOF

    jad posted a topic in Other Sports

    Can we just shut down the damn Hall of fame? ALL of them. And create a shrine to loser, petty, whining, moralistic reporters and other voters and their idiot supporters? A place where bonds, Pete, Manny, Roger, Shoeless Joe, A-Rod and other of the greatest athletes who ever lived can gather with Bill B. and stand in awe before them?
  13. jad
    Apparently, no one has mentioned Bobby Bonilla (for a while during Covid, wasn't he the highest paid player in the league? even though he's been retired for a decade?). Back-loaded contracts are not new.
  14. jad
    I was quoting someone, no idea who it was. I have no idea where they stand. I only know they don't spend enough.
  15. jad
    Things are pretty bad when "getting close to middle-of-the-pack-on-spending" is regarded as a positive.
  16. jad
    That's right. And I assume the reasons players agree to it is that they can beat their chests and say "I get paid 200K!" rather than "I get paid $192K." I know it seems silly--these players don't seem to care about money as much as they care about the appearance of having it. But that's no different from the businesses I've been involved in. When my company once published salaries, thinking the overpaid fat-asses would be embarrassed, they were instead proud of the wage disparity. I don't know anyone embarrassed by what they make (although I have many times woken up, checked the mirror to make sure my reflection is still there, and muttered 'I can't believe they pay me to do this.')
  17. jad
    Ok. so they can shift money around to avoid the lux tax (sort of like income averaging to avoid a windfall tax on an extraordinarily good year). you're saying that lower spending teams (with no lux tax) have no reason to do this. I guess I see this. But I still don't see how this affects competitive balance. teams that pay more have an advantage over teams that pay less. And they will no matter how the shift money from one year to another.
  18. jad
    I don't see the objection to deferrals. How do they affect competitive balance? Teams front-load or back-load contracts all the time--the salary cap is based on averages so what difference does it make? Not arguing here; I just don't understand the objection.
  19. jad
    What competitive balance? You mean like in the twenties? or pre-free-agency? I'm sure owners want a cap for workers, just as they do in all businesses, as long as the cap doesn't apply to administrators. And the closer that cap is the the sum--no. of workers X minimum wage--the better they like it.
  20. jad
    Certainly in my 'business' this was the case.
  21. jad
    Is a voting member defined as one with a MLB contract? (even if they were sent down). Obviously we don't know what goes on in Union meetings, but di you know of a case where those players have actually exercised the power that they theoretically have? (From the looks of things, they don't e.g., what you pointed out as the startling difference between average and mean salaries).
  22. jad
    Yeah, it just seems impossible as long as top players have the power. How do young players get that leverage, since so many of them, say, are in the minors. Do they have any say in Players Union? Could pre-arb players even form a significant bloc? I assume part of the thinking is that fans come SPECIFICALLY to see well-paid players. I.e., some of those LAD fans show up not bec. Ohtani is the best player in the world, but rather because he's the most highly paid player in the world? So everyone has a stake in paying him like that? (No one, besides the player, has a stake in raising the minimum.)
  23. jad
    Do you think the problem is exacerbated in sports, where 'union reps' aren't blue-collar guys who 'came up through the ranks' but celebrity/stars (e.g., as when Chris Paul was heading the NBA union). When super-max players lead the union, super-max contracts are the primary focus? I assume rookies have even less leverage than young workers have in ordinary businesses.
  24. jad
    Yes, and the Yankees ruined baseball in the 20s! I mean who ever talks about that era? Then ruined it again in the 50s and 60s. No one watched baseball for years after that. And the Lakers? Celtics? Don't get me started. They made Bb unwatchable: Bird vs. Magic? Who wants to see that s***. As for those sold-out Dodger Stadium games? Those 50,000+ fans are obviously fools and don't know anything about sports. I'm amazed the league doesn't throw them out so baseball can go back to the way it was when ... well, when ... I forget when.
  25. jad
    Don't be ridiculous! That would never happen. Instead, they would simply waive him or perhaps, yes, trade him, but only to the Dodgers, and for no more than a prospect and perhaps a player under indictment.
×
×
  • Create New...