Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
I guess it sounds good? IDK if they are going to go large and long on a SS. They'll need to prove me wrong.

 

I think we get PTSD from bad offseasons and losing seasons and forgot the Sox still are and continue to be one of the biggest spenders in MLB baseball. Every time they go a few years without spending big they go out and set the market time and time and time and time again. With close $100 million to spend and a BIG 4 in SS I think it's a good opinion to have to expect them to go big at SS.

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I think we get PTSD from bad offseasons and losing seasons and forgot the Sox still are and continue to be one of the biggest spenders in MLB baseball. Every time they go a few years without spending big they go out and set the market time and time and time and time again. With close $100 million to spend and a BIG 4 in SS I think it's a good opinion to have to expect them to go big at SS.

 

While I agree that the Red Sox have been consistent spenders, I think it's been a while since they have set the market on anything. The biggest deal they have ever handed out is Price's 217 mill, which now falls well below some of the biggest contracts.

Posted
While I agree that the Red Sox have been consistent spenders, I think it's been a while since they have set the market on anything. The biggest deal they have ever handed out is Price's 217 mill, which now falls well below some of the biggest contracts.

 

They’re 95 million below the cap, it’s not a guarantee they will go over or even right up against it but we know at the very least they’re spending most of that money. Precedent proves this, the money is going somewhere, we can expect big moves.

Posted
I think we get PTSD from bad offseasons and losing seasons and forgot the Sox still are and continue to be one of the biggest spenders in MLB baseball. Every time they go a few years without spending big they go out and set the market time and time and time and time again. With close $100 million to spend and a BIG 4 in SS I think it's a good opinion to have to expect them to go big at SS.

 

There have been some abosolutely putrid offseasons in recent memory starting with the Hanley/Pablo debacle.

Posted
While I agree that the Red Sox have been consistent spenders, I think it's been a while since they have set the market on anything. The biggest deal they have ever handed out is Price's 217 mill, which now falls well below some of the biggest contracts.

 

Setting the market isn't always a good idea. Even after they signed Manny the pushed him through waivers every season.

Posted
The problem is there are only 3 guys you can consider ACES on this years class: Verlander, Rodon, and DeGrome. All of those guys are going to blow up your budget (which would be fine if there weren't so many holes to fill) and carry significant Injury and or age risk. I love Verlander, but there's very high-risk next year is the year he hits the wall and can no longer be a staple in anyone rotation, and if it's not next year then maybe it's the next. Does anyone think that's not a massive risk for 40 million dollars per year for his age 40, 41, and 42 seasons? I really would have to see 70 million wasted on him and Sale with little to nothing to show. DeGrome is a safer bet with age but has the injury track record to scare anyone and he's looking at a massive payout still. A team without as many rotation holes to fill will pay him.

 

I almost want to remove Bassit from my suggestion, I like him, but I don't like losing the pick. This is why I love Senga, no QO, but I still think we need two names and likely have to lose a pick to sign a guy.

 

I think we need two names from the Senga/Walker/Bassitt/Manea/Kluber/Heaney/Eovaldi/Syndergaard group to fill out this rotation. I think one needs to be one of the better betts and the other can be who the Sox think may be this years WACHA type. Go into the season with 7 pitchers who are NOT Wink/Crawford.

 

I really like netting picks and going with a Senga/(Syndergaard or Eovaldi) addition. Heck I'd do the same at SS with either Bogaerts/Correa and call it a good offseason while netting picks.

 

Good points. Other than getting a solid SP'er via trade, I think this might be the best we can expect to happen:

 

1 from Nate or Senga

1 from Kluber, Heaney, Lugo, and maybe Wacha or Strahm as a starter.

 

To me, this essentially make 2023 a punt season. Nothing else we could do would make me think we're a top contender, even if we sign Correa, Nimmo and a couple solid pen arms, which ain't happening.

Posted
Good points. Other than getting a solid SP'er via trade, I think this might be the best we can expect to happen:

 

1 from Nate or Senga

1 from Kluber, Heaney, Lugo, and maybe Wacha or Strahm as a starter.

 

To me, this essentially make 2023 a punt season. Nothing else we could do would make me think we're a top contender, even if we sign Correa, Nimmo and a couple solid pen arms, which ain't happening.

 

I look forward to this year's postseason run.

Posted
I look forward to this year's postseason run.

 

I think, by opening day, we will have a roster where most baseball prognosticators pick us as a probable wild card team.

 

How we get there is the 90 million dollar question.

Posted
I think, by opening day, we will have a roster where most baseball prognosticators pick us as a probable wild card team.

 

How we get there is the 90 million dollar question.

 

Maybe John Henry was overly invested in FTX and won't be able to get to that 90M... :(

Posted (edited)
Maybe John Henry was overly invested in FTX and won't be able to get to that 90M... :(

 

Maybe. I'm going on the assumption we once again, end up near the tax line, knowing full well I could be wrong to the plus or the minus.

Edited by moonslav59
Posted
No worries, he's too smart for that.

 

Even if he lost $90M or more on a venture such as that, there is no reason to expect it to force a tightening of the Red Sox winter spending budget.

Posted
Even if he lost $90M or more on a venture such as that, there is no reason to expect it to force a tightening of the Red Sox winter spending budget.

 

He was already forced to sell Liverpool!

Posted
He was already forced to sell Liverpool!

 

Was he forced though? Aren’t they looking at buying a hockey team now? Is there any news on how invested he was if at all into FTX

Posted
He was already forced to sell Liverpool!

 

"Forced to sell." That's a good one.

 

You do know the massive profit that will be made, right?

 

Enough to pay several Dodger payrolls, for sure.

Posted
Was he forced though? Aren’t they looking at buying a hockey team now? Is there any news on how invested he was if at all into FTX

 

I thought it was the Washington Commanders?

Posted
"Forced to sell." That's a good one.

 

You do know the massive profit that will be made, right?

 

Enough to pay several Dodger payrolls, for sure.

 

Does that all go directly to the Red Sox?

Posted
Does that all go directly to the Red Sox?

 

Not likely, the same as any big loss in a Henry investment would hurt the sox winter player spending budget.

 

Your statement about the forced sale of Liverpool made it sound like Henry might have less to spend on the Sox, when the opposite would be truer.

Posted
Not likely, the same as any big loss in a Henry investment would hurt the sox winter player spending budget.

 

Your statement about the forced sale of Liverpool made it sound like Henry might have less to spend on the Sox, when the opposite would be truer.

 

Does he have a buyer? When is the money coming in? Does he have creditors to pay off?

Posted
I have heard absolutely nothing about Henry being invested in FTX, and if he heavily was I feel that we would have heard something. It's possible he may have had a small slice of the pie, but he strikes me as a smart enough man to not put all his eggs in one basket. I think this is a non issue and pure speculation.
Posted
I have heard absolutely nothing about Henry being invested in FTX, and if he heavily was I feel that we would have heard something. It's possible he may have had a small slice of the pie, but he strikes me as a smart enough man to not put all his eggs in one basket. I think this is a non issue and pure speculation.

 

This is coming on the heels of his Bored Apes NFT being stolen as well.

 

Hard times daddy.

Posted
This is coming on the heels of his Bored Apes NFT being stolen as well.

 

Hard times daddy.

 

IDK, this feels like pure conjecture. I don't think Henry is heavily invested in it, or at least enough to change any decisions the Red Sox will make. Is there any evidence to back this up? any articles tying Henry to NFT???

Posted
Didn’t he run his hedge fund business into bankruptcy?

 

Technically he did, but he also built it up too and used it to build up a sports empire that is still going strong.

 

FWIW a lot of hedge funds went belly up during the financial crisis.

Posted
IDK, this feels like pure conjecture. I don't think Henry is heavily invested in it, or at least enough to change any decisions the Red Sox will make. Is there any evidence to back this up? any articles tying Henry to NFT???

 

When the pictures start dropping of him palling around with CZ of Binance and then the Sox really become Tampa North, don't be mad at me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...