Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Community Moderator
Posted
A bigger question is have they played good baseball the past two years. Defense, and base running has not been a Red Sox strength.

 

At times they have played good baseball. Offense can slump, defense should never slump (and should be CHEAP to obtain). It's hard for them to put everything together when the team was built like Frankenstein's monster.

  • Replies 12.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • moonslav59

    2423

  • Old Red

    1587

  • Bellhorn04

    1491

  • notin

    1442

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
At times they have played good baseball. Offense can slump, defense should never slump (and should be CHEAP to obtain). It's hard for them to put everything together when the team was built like Frankenstein's monster.

 

Good analogy on Frankenstein.

Posted
From what I’ve been told yes. I was told it was not good baseball.

 

So, even the ear test beats stats and metrics, for you.

Community Moderator
Posted
So, even the ear test beats stats and metrics, for you.

 

What metrics had them playing good baseball this series? Caught by glass light? Check swings incorrectly called?

Posted
So, even the ear test beats stats and metrics, for you.

 

The ear test comes from the eye test as does the stats, and metrics.

Posted
What metrics had them playing good baseball this series? Caught by glass light? Check swings incorrectly called?

 

Catcher interference?

Community Moderator
Posted
By far the most important stat is that we have outscored the opposition 60 times and underscored them 55 times.

 

Very advanced metrics. Need to dig into the ancient tomes to find how to truly calculate.

Posted
Very advanced metrics. Need to dig into the ancient tomes to find how to truly calculate.

 

Not that I don't enjoy moon's numerical stews or mvp's bathysphere dives.

Community Moderator
Posted
Not that I don't enjoy moon's numerical stews or mvp's bathysphere dives.

 

Bernardino is the bottom of the league in terms of chase rate, but top 20% in K%. He throws a sinker and a curve and gets nobody to chase. Isn't that weird?

Posted
By far the most important stat is that we have outscored the opposition 60 times and underscored them 55 times.

 

You do realize the word “underscore” means “to emphasize”…

Posted
Bernardino is the bottom of the league in terms of chase rate, but top 20% in K%. He throws a sinker and a curve and gets nobody to chase. Isn't that weird?

 

It really is the most confounding of games.

Posted
Bernardino is the bottom of the league in terms of chase rate, but top 20% in K%. He throws a sinker and a curve and gets nobody to chase. Isn't that weird?

 

Crafty with his set up pitches…

Posted
At times they have played good baseball. Offense can slump, defense should never slump (and should be CHEAP to obtain). It's hard for them to put everything together when the team was built like Frankenstein's monster.

 

We need someone good at building a Mr. Potato Head. At least no upside down mustaches.

Posted
We need someone good at building a Mr. Potato Head. At least no upside down mustaches.

 

One of the first signs that the world had gone irrevocably to s*** was when kids started making Mr. Potato Head with plastic potatoes instead of real ones.

Posted
Not that I don't enjoy moon's numerical stews or mvp's bathysphere dives.

 

It's like I'm not even here.

Posted
It's like I'm not even here.

 

When it comes to filling our screens with data, everyone has to take a back seat to those two.

Community Moderator
Posted
Crafty with his set up pitches…

 

Maybe? I was just wondering if he was just throwing more in zone pitches and sticking closer to the edge of the plate. His curve doesn't have a lot of break, so he's not trying to throw it in the dirt the way Matt Barnes would with his big 12-6.

Community Moderator
Posted
We need someone good at building a Mr. Potato Head. At least no upside down mustaches.

 

Ryan Fernandez is out then.

Community Moderator
Posted
When it comes to filling our screens with data, everyone has to take a back seat to those two.

 

In terms of filling the screen, I can't compete with moon. I'm not even going to attempt to try.

Posted
In terms of filling the screen, I can't compete with moon. I'm not even going to attempt to try.

 

I'm guessing everyone here has mastered the skill of scrolling through moon's posts at high speed, though.

Posted
I'm guessing everyone here has mastered the skill of scrolling through moon's posts at high speed, though.

 

I read his posts in no more than 15 seconds. Took me a couple weeks to master that skill.

Posted
I read his posts in no more than 15 seconds. Took me a couple weeks to master that skill.

 

15 seconds? You really have work to do.

Posted
Banned in 2010, so probably not?

 

I thought that, when talking about the history of talksox, a gom mention was warranted. Oh bosox21, where art thou?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...