Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Red Sox trade Hunter Renfroe in trade involving Jackie Bradley Jr


Recommended Posts

Posted
Time to cancel notin.

 

I’m harder to cancel than AOL, which was harder to get rid of than herpes…

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
His channel is called notflix...

 

Speaking of which, I’m raising your rates. It’s going to cost money to take away those good shows…

Posted
The real point we've established is that one hit a week can make a big difference.

 

No.

 

Unless that one hit a week accounts for 107 total bases by season end…

Posted
No.

 

Unless that one hit a week accounts for 107 total bases by season end…

 

But of course the difference was 48 hits, because there were more at bats.

 

Are you honestly trying to argue that one hit a week does not make a big difference?

 

Yes or no.

Posted
The Sox had 1434 hits, last year and scored 829 runs.

 

If you apply the same ratio to 30 hits, it comes to 17.3 runs, or 1.73 WAR- rounded up to 2.

 

 

The major league average for 2021 was 16.7 runs per 30 hits.

Posted
If he's hitting 165, it's a problem. If he's hitting 225, you live with it.

 

Yes.

 

Not sure he can hit that high though.

 

He sucks.

Posted
The problem with this entire argument is the use of BA in and of itself.

 

Its not when he hits that low.

Posted
I’m harder to cancel than AOL, which was harder to get rid of than herpes…

 

I miss AOL.

 

Times were easier back then.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
But of course the difference was 48 hits, because there were more at bats.

 

Are you honestly trying to argue that one hit a week does not make a big difference?

 

Yes or no.

 

Correct. Especially since not all hits are created equal and why I keep bringing it back to total bases...

Posted
Correct. Especially since not all hits are created equal and why I keep bringing it back to total bases...

 

So your original point that the difference between 165 and 225 is only one hit a week is:

 

a) an interesting mathematical tidbit

B) that says nothing about the actual impact on runs, wins and losses

Community Moderator
Posted
The problem with this entire argument is the use of BA in and of itself.

 

No, it's fine because we already have a good idea what his bb/k rate would be. If he's hitting 225, he's getting on base. If he's only hitting 165, it's a nightmare.

Posted
No, it's fine because we already have a good idea what his bb/k rate would be. If he's hitting 225, he's getting on base. If he's only hitting 165, it's a nightmare.

 

True. His 6.5% BB rate was the lowest of his career. Only his 7.3% in 2014 was close.

 

His career BB% is 9%, and it was higher before 2021.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Correct. Especially since not all hits are created equal and why I keep bringing it back to total bases...

 

Let me correct this.

 

You’re looking at team numbers and applying them to a single player This is not true. One hit per week from Vlad Guerrero is worth more than one hit per week from Sergio Espinal, because Vlad’s hits are for more total bases based on each player’s SLG. Team data involves a distribution of hits not every player is capable of achieving.

 

There are many formulas for Runs Created. The most basic one they are all derived from is Total Bases*(hits +walks)/PA. So a blanket statement that one hit per week = 2 more wins (an increase of 20 RC) is entirely dependent on the total bases involved with those extra hits...

Posted
Let me correct this.

 

You’re looking at team numbers and applying them to a single player This is not true. One hit per week from Vlad Guerrero is worth more than one hit per week from Sergio Espinal, because Vlad’s hits are for more total bases based on each player’s SLG. Team data involves a distribution of hits not every player is capable of achieving.

 

There are many formulas for Runs Created. The most basic one they are all derived from is Total Bases*(hits +walks)/PA. So a blanket statement that one hit per week = 2 more wins (an increase of 20 RC) is entirely dependent on the total bases involved with those extra hits...

 

"Total bases" is not "hits+walks." Hits don't count dbls as 2, triples as 3 and HRs as 4.

Posted
Let me correct this.

 

You’re looking at team numbers and applying them to a single player This is not true. One hit per week from Vlad Guerrero is worth more than one hit per week from Sergio Espinal, because Vlad’s hits are for more total bases based on each player’s SLG. Team data involves a distribution of hits not every player is capable of achieving.

 

There are many formulas for Runs Created. The most basic one they are all derived from is Total Bases*(hits +walks)/PA. So a blanket statement that one hit per week = 2 more wins (an increase of 20 RC) is entirely dependent on the total bases involved with those extra hits...

 

You started all this trouble.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
"Total bases" is not "hits+walks." Hits don't count dbls as 2, triples as 3 and HRs as 4.

 

 

The formula that I (tried to) write is total bases times the sum of hits and walks. Etc.

 

The point is “hits” alone don’t equate to runs and ultimately wins. Total bases are a very big factor...

Posted
Again, please read post 706...

 

Please read post 694...

 

Obviously, 30 hits does not automatically translate to 17 runs. But on average, it does.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Please read post 694...

 

Obviously, 30 hits does not automatically translate to 17 runs. But on average, it does.

 

There was nothing mathematically incorrect in 694. The same cannot be said about 706.

 

And “on average” isn’t always best applied to every individual. Me, you and Bill Gates have an average net worth of over $10 billion. That’s a true statement (assuming I correctly guessed his net worth). Does it feel accurate when applied to just you?

Posted
There was nothing mathematically incorrect in 694. The same cannot be said about 706.

 

Oh dear, I left out the 'on average' part. Mea culpa!

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Oh dear, I left out the 'on average' part. Mea culpa!

 

 

Wow. You admitted an error to me? I’ll take it despite completely recognizing the sarcasm. :)

Posted
Let me correct this.

 

You’re looking at team numbers and applying them to a single player This is not true. One hit per week from Vlad Guerrero is worth more than one hit per week from Sergio Espinal, because Vlad’s hits are for more total bases based on each player’s SLG. Team data involves a distribution of hits not every player is capable of achieving.

 

There are many formulas for Runs Created. The most basic one they are all derived from is Total Bases*(hits +walks)/PA. So a blanket statement that one hit per week = 2 more wins (an increase of 20 RC) is entirely dependent on the total bases involved with those extra hits...

 

The boys down at Clancy's were debating these formulas just the other night.

Community Moderator
Posted
The boys down at Clancy's were debating these formulas just the other night.

 

Those boys down at Clancy's also like to yell ignorant s*** at the tv whenever Betts would watch a called third strike.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Those boys down at Clancy's also like to yell ignorant s*** at the tv whenever Betts would watch a called third strike.

 

They also yell at Belichick when he makes a questionable play call on third and long, apparently thinking his headset links directly to microphones at Clancy’s…

Community Moderator
Posted
They also yell at Belichick when he makes a questionable play call on third and long, apparently thinking his headset links directly to microphones at Clancy’s…

 

Advanced statistical debates are quite lively at Clancy's.

 

Big Joe has a +3 on MTR (missing toilet receptacle)

Sully is a -5 on VIA (vomiting in alley)

Al is -35 on STP (server tip percentage)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...