Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Dwight Evans and Jim Rice hater. ^^^^

 

While Rice had a decent 1986 season, it was not the old Jim Rice.

 

Evans was buttah as he aged, and yes, he was fun to watch all through the 80's. I just think of him as a 70's guy, but he was better in the 80's. (My bad.)

Posted
If you chose the 2010's, no offense, but you are objectively wrong and should question all of your life choices, IMHO.

 

Unless you're a real youngster.

Posted
Having attended my first Red Sox game in 53 (Went to see the Boston Braves before that ) 04 and that decade was the best. But the most electric was 67 because it was so unexpected. I believe the phenomenon known as Red Sox Nation was born that year.
Posted
Having attended my first Red Sox game in 53 (Went to see the Boston Braves before that ) 04 and that decade was the best. But the most electric was 67 because it was so unexpected. I believe the phenomenon known as Red Sox Nation was born that year.

 

Certainly '67 was so surprising, the magic was plentiful.

 

(I was not following baseball back then.)

Posted
Being one out away in 86 is light years ahead of anything since 1918. That team was great and should be cherished.

 

That was a great year, but we're talking decades.

 

The 70's teams were way more fun to watch almost all 10 years.

 

How about the amount of seasons finishing 10 or more games out?

 

2- 2000's

2- 2010's

4- 1970's

5- 1990's (less if you count GB wild card)

5- 1980's

 

How about 90+ win seasons?

 

7- 2000's (8 straight years with 86 or more wins- 7 of those with 93+)

5- 2010's (1- 89 wins)

4- 1970's (10 seasons with 83 or more wins)

2- 1990's (Not more than 88 wins until 1998)

1- 1980's (1- 89 wins)

 

The 90's won more than the 80's, and the new playoff set-up helped us make the playoffs more often.

Posted
While Rice had a decent 1986 season, it was not the old Jim Rice.

 

Evans was buttah as he aged, and yes, he was fun to watch all through the 80's. I just think of him as a 70's guy, but he was better in the 80's. (My bad.)

 

"Decent" Jim Rice came in third in AL MVP balloting that year, his highest finish outside of 1978...

Posted
"Decent" Jim Rice came in third in AL MVP balloting that year, his highest finish outside of 1978...

 

His decline started in 1984, but 1986 was much better than "decent." My bad.

Posted
Having attended my first Red Sox game in 53 (Went to see the Boston Braves before that ) 04 and that decade was the best. But the most electric was 67 because it was so unexpected. I believe the phenomenon known as Red Sox Nation was born that year.

 

Glad you posted this. The Yankee series in 04 is absolutely the only thing that in my mind could top that '67 season. We listened to every game and watched the ones we could. We were captivated by this amazing team.

Posted
Glad you posted this. The Yankee series in 04 is absolutely the only thing that in my mind could top that '67 season. We listened to every game and watched the ones we could. We were captivated by this amazing team.

I was still a student at Holy Cross back then. All of New England stopped to watch the Red Sox play. Several of the Jesuit professors cancelled their classes and postponed "blue books" so everyone could watch the sox.

Posted
If you chose the 2010's, no offense, but you are objectively wrong and should question all of your life choices, IMHO.

 

I'm not offended by your subjective opinion, but I'm not objective at all about my reasons.

 

I took my son to his first Fenway game in early ‘17 and he started collecting baseball cards. In ’18 he got to skip school and watch Mookie Betts hit three home runs (he’s 5-2 in Bosox games attended so far). In 2018-19 he insisted on wearing Red Sox shirts to school every day of the year. Now he uses an axe bat in Little League and has also trick-or-treated as Mookie the last three Halloweens.

 

The Red Sox may never win a title again in his lifetime, but he'll always have the memories of this decade.

Posted
Glad you posted this. The Yankee series in 04 is absolutely the only thing that in my mind could top that '67 season. We listened to every game and watched the ones we could. We were captivated by this amazing team.

 

If the Yankee series had been a movie where the Sox were down 3 games to 1, and trailing in the ninth inning of game 4 against the greatest closer of all time, and managed to come back and win the game and the series, I would have thought “Good movie. But not believable.”

 

 

 

 

Especially since in this movie, Terry Francona is played by Michael Caine, Dave Roberts is played by Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, and Mariano Rivera by Luis Guzman. Right, Bellhorn?

Posted
Nothing will ever equal 2004 and it's not just the WS Championship. Nothing will ever match beating the MFY after being down 3-0, something that had never been done before, and then winning the World Series Championship. The WS was just "gravy on the cake" as my friend with a gift for malapropisms says. If the Sox hadn't won another game between the 2004 WS and the end of the 2010 season that decade would still be my favorite.

 

Agreed with this completely. I was 16 at the time and that single handedly had me hookedon baseball and more importantly the Red Sox. I will never forget that moment. I'm sure the seasons of 67, 75, 86 were exciting for fans then too other than coming up short in the World Series but I wasn't alive then lol.

Posted
If the Yankee series had been a movie where the Sox were down 3 games to 1, and trailing in the ninth inning of game 4 against the greatest closer of all time, and managed to come back and win the game and the series, I would have thought “Good movie. But not believable.”

 

 

 

 

Especially since in this movie, Terry Francona is played by Michael Caine, Dave Roberts is played by Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, and Mariano Rivera by Luis Guzman. Right, Bellhorn?

 

You meant 3-0, right? At 3-1, they might have said "Oh well. Let it go. It's only a movie."

Posted
I still can't believe the Yankees didn't bunt on Schilling.

 

Yankee fans still bitch at Torre about that.

 

Crazy as it is, there seems to be a sort of code of honor employed at times...

Posted
The most incredible thing of all about 2004 might be those 2 umpire reversals in Game 6. The fact that they got them both right, without replay, and both in our favor, and in Yankee Stadium...mind-boggling, in a good way. It's why I will never say anything bad about Joe West.
Posted
The most incredible thing of all about 2004 might be those 2 umpire reversals in Game 6. The fact that they got them both right, without replay, and both in our favor, and in Yankee Stadium...mind-boggling, in a good way. It's why I will never say anything bad about Joe West.

 

Again, a big part of the reason why the movie would be so unbelievable...

Posted
The most incredible thing of all about 2004 might be those 2 umpire reversals in Game 6. The fact that they got them both right, without replay, and both in our favor, and in Yankee Stadium...mind-boggling, in a good way. It's why I will never say anything bad about Joe West.

 

And for Joe's call on the fan closing Mookie's glove on the Altuve shot in the greatest game in Red Sox history... in all of 2018.

Community Moderator
Posted
Again, a big part of the reason why the movie would be so unbelievable...

 

It's more unbelievable that Drew Barrymore runs out onto the field after the final out of the WS.

Posted
It's more unbelievable that Drew Barrymore runs out onto the field after the final out of the WS.

 

Or that she was cast opposite Jimmy Fallon...

Posted
And for Joe's call on the fan closing Mookie's glove on the Altuve shot in the greatest game in Red Sox history... in all of 2018.

 

Good point. The Sox should be selling Joe West t-shirts. ;)

Posted
And for Joe's call on the fan closing Mookie's glove on the Altuve shot in the greatest game in Red Sox history... in all of 2018.

 

Would Robot Joe West have made that call?

Posted
Yes. 3 to 0. Dopey me.

 

That whole series was so unbelievable, I can’t even recap it right...

 

I listened to/watched every pitch of that post-season (I was on the west coast, so there were no late nights for me) and vowed I would never get so invested in a sports event again! (I can remember the exact intersection I was standing when I came to that decision, but I can't recall what point in the Yankees series we were--maybe after win 1?).

Posted
Unless you're a real youngster.

 

That would be an acceptable defense. Do we have anyone here too young to remember 2004?

 

I'm not offended by your subjective opinion, but I'm not objective at all about my reasons.

 

I took my son to his first Fenway game in early ‘17 and he started collecting baseball cards. In ’18 he got to skip school and watch Mookie Betts hit three home runs (he’s 5-2 in Bosox games attended so far). In 2018-19 he insisted on wearing Red Sox shirts to school every day of the year. Now he uses an axe bat in Little League and has also trick-or-treated as Mookie the last three Halloweens.

 

The Red Sox may never win a title again in his lifetime, but he'll always have the memories of this decade.

 

My daughter (now 7) has idolized Mookie since toddlerhood, so I can definitely relate to this.

 

Don't be silly, though...your son will see even more Red Sox championships than his old man. ;)

Community Moderator
Posted
That would be an acceptable defense. Do we have anyone here too young to remember 2004?

 

Just Thunder I think. The boomers haven't outed any other zoomers at this point.

Posted
Just Thunder I think. The boomers haven't outed any other zoomers at this point.

 

I think Thunder might be too young to remember 2018...

Community Moderator
Posted
I think Thunder might be too young to remember 2018...

 

I don't remember much from my first year of college, but I think Thunder is still not drinking.

Posted
That would be an acceptable defense. Do we have anyone here too young to remember 2004?

 

 

 

My daughter (now 7) has idolized Mookie since toddlerhood, so I can definitely relate to this.

 

Don't be silly, though...your son will see even more Red Sox championships than his old man. ;)

 

Jack, my boy is 8 and he's been all about Betts since he can remember. In Papi's last year, I was praying the Sox hung on to Mookie because he was the perfect player for a budding fan: a young star with the easy name identification.

 

Don't worry, even if Boston's front office doesn't actually read our threads and take this forum as the gospel that it is, they fully understand the intrinsic value of their star players and the emotional impact they have on their customers...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...