Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

Still TBD vs TBD. I have to assume the Yankees will use Happ as he hasn't lost as a Yankee and he has been the most consistent. The best pitcher on the team rebounded a bit in September, but with memories of his debachle last year in the WC game and his swoon then rebounding to above average doesn't instill a lot of confidence. Also, Sevy has a 6.23ERA with 14 baserunners in 8.2IP this year in 2 starts vs the A's.

 

Happ has been lights out for the Yankees. He's 6-0 with a sub 3 ERA in NY and tossed a 1ER 6IP game vs Oakland earlier in the year. The only concern I have here is the right handedness of their lineup and how powerful they can be.

 

Tanaka would have been an easy choice. He was on fire coming into the last two starts, then all he did was suck ass and allow 2 baserunners per inning in his last 2 starts. He's got the playoff resume. He has the stuff and he was hot. He hasn't faced the A's this year. He is also a right hander, which could be of benefit against all their righty power.

 

For the A's, I truly think they're gonna BP game this one. Their strength is the pen and their rotation is like a game of survivor where nobody survived

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

OK Jacksonianmarch. you asked me about it on another thread and now it has come to fruition. LETS GO A's!!!

 

(based on your SP stats in your OP i would agree that Happ should start this game. but because: Boone. who knows???)

Posted

We can agree on the Boone point. He's been tight lipped. I am wondering if he won't report a SP and will just wing it.

 

To be honest with you, I'd report Robertson as the starter. This whole "beginner" thing has kept teams from stacking their lineups with lefties or righties since they don't actually know who will be pitching the bulk of the game

Posted

To be honest with you, I'd report Robertson as the starter. This whole "beginner" thing has kept teams from stacking their lineups with lefties or righties since they don't actually know who will be pitching the bulk of the game

 

this begs the question...is doing this considered "gamesmanship" or is it "cheating"?

if this was football + Patriots it would be deemed "cheating". but i am curious what my fellow TS posters think of reporting a LH reliever as SP and then game time after lineups are turned in pulling him for a RH SP.

i vote that's cheating.

Posted

It isn't cheating. It is definitely gamesmanship. Cheating is violating a specific rule. There is no rule that you can't start a game with a reliever.

 

The Patriots actually cheated. They deflated footballs and taped practices. Those things are not allowed in the NFL.

Posted
And TB destroyed his phone before anyone could look at it. Destroying evidence isn't something that is typically done by the innocent. But maybe he had photos on there with his dong out that he didn't want leaked.
Posted
I guess I can understand your fear of the Yankees.........

 

I'm not afraid of anyone. I just always root for the Yankee opponent. It's a habit.

Posted
I'm not afraid of anyone. I just always root for the Yankee opponent. It's a habit.

 

And you can be sure Billy's second favorite team is whoever's playing the Red Sox.

Posted
Why is wrong? Your supposedly number 1 is starting.

 

Well, given Severino's poor 2nd half and the combo of him and Sanchez didn't fair so well vs the A's in early Sept makes me feel there were better choices.

 

But he will be on a very short leash and I do like the prospect of Happ going against the sox should the Yanks get past the A's.

Posted
And you can be sure Billy's second favorite team is whoever's playing the Red Sox.

 

Nah, I'm not one of those guys.

 

In fact, I hate when someone says "My second favorite team is ......."

 

I love the Yanks and hate every other team.

Posted
Well, given Severino's poor 2nd half and the combo of him and Sanchez didn't fair so well vs the A's in early Sept makes me feel there were better choices.

 

But he will be on a very short leash and I do like the prospect of Happ going against the sox should the Yanks get past the A's.

 

IMO, Boone is making a mistake not starting Happ in this game. He is already looking ahead to the ALDS. If the Yankees beat the A's, it will look like a great move. However, if it backfires, the Yankees go home. The stakes are too high. You can't risk being eliminated with your best starter sitting on the bench, being saved for a series that might never come.

Posted
IMO, Boone is making a mistake not starting Happ in this game. He is already looking ahead to the ALDS. If the Yankees beat the A's, it will look like a great move. However, if it backfires, the Yankees go home. The stakes are too high. You can't risk being eliminated with your best starter sitting on the bench, being saved for a series that might never come.

 

It is a ballsy call IMO. If it works he looks like a genius, if it doesn't he will feel the wrath of the Yankee faithful.

 

But I guess his thinking is that Sevy will be on a short leash so if he's not on the damage will be minimalized.

 

My bigger concern is Sanchez catching.

Posted

I'm fine with Sevy starting, he has the highest ceiling of the three options. Whoever starts is going to have a short leash anyway.

 

And although he did got rocked by the A's previously, he has looked better over his last few starts: 17.2 IP, 2.04 ERA, 0.96 WHIP, 18 Ks

Posted
I wonder, if they looked at Sevy-Happ as a 50-50 choice and chose Sevy, because they wanted Happ twice vs the Sox.

 

If that was the line of thought Boone is a bigger moron than I realized, can't plan for something that may not happen

 

For tonight it should be all hands on deck, there's no "tomorrow" if we lose tonight

Posted
If that was the line of thought Boone is a bigger moron than I realized, can't plan for something that may not happen

 

For tonight it should be all hands on deck, there's no "tomorrow" if we lose tonight

 

If it was 50-50, I can see looking ahead. If it was 50.001 to 49.999, He should have gone with Happ.

Posted
If it was 50-50, I can see looking ahead. If it was 50.001 to 49.999, He should have gone with Happ.

 

LOL. It would be nice if such decisions could be quantified with that kind of precision.

Posted
LOL. It would be nice if such decisions could be quantified with that kind of precision.

 

advanced metrics. there is 1 guy that watches every pitch by every pitcher of every game and he decides.

Posted
advanced metrics. there is 1 guy that watches every pitch by every pitcher of every game and he decides.

 

That's a real Catch-22. Because any guy that watches every pitch of every game would obviously be insane. :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...