Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Community Moderator
Posted
The Sox do have a lot of those players for 2019 already.

 

As Dombrowski is a big time trader and really, has not much in the farm to deal, who will he put on the market?

 

I think, besides one or both of Chavis and Dalbec, the Sox might entertain deals for Rodriguez and Swihart. A third possibility is Bogaerts, but interest might be lessened once the Cubs make Addison Russell available at a discount...

 

I keep Chavis and Dalbec and hope one of them turns into an adequate 1b. I think Swihart is most likely traded. Not sure they can trade Bogaerts as they don't have a good replacement for him at SS or in the 5th spot.

  • Replies 204
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I keep Chavis and Dalbec and hope one of them turns into an adequate 1b. I think Swihart is most likely traded. Not sure they can trade Bogaerts as they don't have a good replacement for him at SS or in the 5th spot.

 

Well there is a certain wildly unpopular free agent shortstop that Dombrowski has reportedly tried to acquire before...

Community Moderator
Posted
Well there is a certain wildly unpopular free agent shortstop that Dombrowski has reportedly tried to acquire before...

 

So trade Bogaerts to sign a more expensive SS? That doesn't seem like a DD move.

Posted
So trade Bogaerts to sign a more expensive SS? That doesn't seem like a DD move.

 

It doesn’t?

 

This is a GM who lost a Victor Martinez for the season and replaced him by giving Prince Fielder one of the biggest contracts in history. And at a time when interest in Fielder was minimal, to be kind.

 

Also with one year left and an agent named Boras, this might be viewed as the ideal time to move breakout player Bogaerts.

 

I’m not a proponent of this strategy, but it’s not unrealistic. After all, DD reportedly tried to trade Bogaerts for the more expensive Machado last off-season...

Posted
So trade Bogaerts to sign a more expensive SS? That doesn't seem like a DD move.

 

And really, even though the money was a lot less, Dombrowski did trade Shaw and sign the more expensive Moreland...

Posted
seemed to work out ok tho?

lolz

 

That’s why you got Eovaldi and he and Porcello fed us our ass. That’s what I’m saying. If you allow Eo to leave, you’re gonna have 4 lefties in your 2019 rotation. That’s gonna be a problem

Posted
That’s why you got Eovaldi and he and Porcello fed us our ass. That’s what I’m saying. If you allow Eo to leave, you’re gonna have 4 lefties in your 2019 rotation. That’s gonna be a problem

 

Unless DD trades ERod...

Posted
And really, even though the money was a lot less, Dombrowski did trade Shaw and sign the more expensive Moreland...

 

Not sure how the dots connect there.

Posted
Unless DD trades ERod...

 

But why do that? Erod clearly isn't healthy after injuring the ankle, but his numbers were sparkling this year. You don't deal ERod, you build with him, especially since he is cheap and the sox are running into a funding crisis. To add to my point about being too left handed. Look at these numbers from the series

 

In the ALDS

Yanks vs lefties

10.2IP 8ER 6.75ERA

 

Yanks vs righties

26IP 6ER 2.07ERA

 

And that is with Kimbrel trying to blow two games by allowing 3ER in 2.1IP. You need another starter who can balance out the rotation with Porcello for 2019. Eovaldi did that. If he isn't re-signed, the sox will need to do that if they are to beat NYY again. I think the chances we meet in the ALDS next year are really, really high

Posted
Not sure how the dots connect there.

 

The idea of trading one player to replace him with a more expensive free agent?

 

I wouldn’t be surprised if DD traded Bogaerts and signed Machado. If he did try to deal for Machado last off-season, presumably there was also a plan to extend him.

 

This move doesn’t appear that it would be very popular with a lot of Sox fans, and maybe, like a lot of people, DD has soured on Machado since then.

 

Or maybe not...

Posted
The idea of trading one player to replace him with a more expensive free agent?

 

I wouldn’t be surprised if DD traded Bogaerts and signed Machado. If he did try to deal for Machado last off-season, presumably there was also a plan to extend him.

 

This move doesn’t appear that it would be very popular with a lot of Sox fans, and maybe, like a lot of people, DD has soured on Machado since then.

 

Or maybe not...

 

I do not think the open checkbook will extend forever for DD. You've already surpassed the final lux tax line and will be losing 10 spots in the draft while paying high taxes. My guess is you won't be doing that forever

Posted
But why do that? Erod clearly isn't healthy after injuring the ankle, but his numbers were sparkling this year. You don't deal ERod, you build with him, especially since he is cheap and the sox are running into a funding crisis. To add to my point about being too left handed. Look at these numbers from the series

 

In the ALDS

Yanks vs lefties

10.2IP 8ER 6.75ERA

 

Yanks vs righties

26IP 6ER 2.07ERA

 

And that is with Kimbrel trying to blow two games by allowing 3ER in 2.1IP. You need another starter who can balance out the rotation with Porcello for 2019. Eovaldi did that. If he isn't re-signed, the sox will need to do that if they are to beat NYY again. I think the chances we meet in the ALDS next year are really, really high

 

We have a GM who likes trading, no farm system to trade from, and the possibility of multiple needs.

 

There are certainly reasons to keep ERod, but I do doubt he is untouchable and could be dealt for the right price...

Posted
Why?

 

Kimbrel’s next contract is about what he can give you for the next 4-5 years, not about what he did for one week in October...

 

Pablo Sandoval says "Hi!".

Posted
I do not think the open checkbook will extend forever for DD. You've already surpassed the final lux tax line and will be losing 10 spots in the draft while paying high taxes. My guess is you won't be doing that forever

 

Eh.

 

Given Dombrowski’s draft history, is dropping 10 spots really a deterrent?

 

At some point the spending will get cut off. Maybe it is this off-season. But maybe not...

Posted
We have a GM who likes trading, no farm system to trade from, and the possibility of multiple needs.

 

There are certainly reasons to keep ERod, but I do doubt he is untouchable and could be dealt for the right price...

 

But what is the price? That's the question. ERod is heading into his second year of arb after being a super 2 player in 2018. He's got three more years of control and with his innings being down this year, you're likely looking at a $5 mil price tag? That's a great thing. Have a starter who has turned into a strike out pitcher with good enough command at 25 yrs old making $5 mil. Those guys can be dealt for a lot, but the problem with the sox right now is the payroll is too high. How do you deal off a controlled, cheap, producing asset without killing the payroll? Would you deal him for Bumgarner? DeGrom? Who knows, but either of those guys will come with a far higher price tag and lux tax hit

Posted
Eh.

 

Given Dombrowski’s draft history, is dropping 10 spots really a deterrent?

 

At some point the spending will get cut off. Maybe it is this off-season. But maybe not...

 

The sox are heading into 2019 with two consecutive years of being over the lux tax. In 2018, the sox were the only team to surpass the final threshold. The sox are going to get a 30% tax this year with a 42.5% surtax for going over the final line. Next year, the lux tax penalties are 50% with a 45% surtax over the final line. Every penny over that line will be taxed at 95%??!?! This year, the few mil they are over the final line is being taxed at 72.5%. Not good, but far better than another jump.

Posted
But what is the price? That's the question. ERod is heading into his second year of arb after being a super 2 player in 2018. He's got three more years of control and with his innings being down this year, you're likely looking at a $5 mil price tag? That's a great thing. Have a starter who has turned into a strike out pitcher with good enough command at 25 yrs old making $5 mil. Those guys can be dealt for a lot, but the problem with the sox right now is the payroll is too high. How do you deal off a controlled, cheap, producing asset without killing the payroll? Would you deal him for Bumgarner? DeGrom? Who knows, but either of those guys will come with a far higher price tag and lux tax hit

 

I’m not sure, and that would certainly depend on the Sox off-season plans. But if a recent comparison can be found for a deal involving a similar player to ERod, that is a good starting point...

Posted
Money has bot been a major factor since Tom Yawkey went out and bought Foxx, Grove, Cramer, et al. Not when a pitcher is this good.
Posted (edited)
Nobody is Rivera. You need to think about that. Kimbrel needs high end stuff and both pitches working or he becomes erratic. Rivera threw one pitch, which he located with perfection and did it for 18 seasons. Even when his velocity waned, he was effective. He retired at 43 years old mostly because he didn't want to keep doing it. Heck, he had a 2.11ERA as a 43 yr old with 44 saves. As good as he was during the regular season, he was better in the playoffs. In 141 post season innings, he allowed 2 homeruns. 11 runners scored on him in that time. He only walked 21 batters in those innings. What he did in the regular season will never be repeated. What he did in the post season is absolutely absurd and is effectively the best playoff performance over a career in any sport of all time.

 

Rivera was an elite closer, maybe the best ever, but the SOX probably had more success against him than any other team. Similar to the success the SOX have had over the Yankems' present closer Chapman.

Edited by SPLENDIDSPLINTER
Posted
Rivera was an elite close, maybe the best ever, but the SOX probably had more success against him than any other team. Similar to the success the SOX have had over the Yankems' present closer Chapman.

 

Maybe the best ever? It isn’t close. He’s the GOAT. And I don’t think he’ll ever be dethroned. Akin to how Jerry Rice will never be dethroned as the best WR of all time. Nowadays, closers have a two pitch mix with obscene velocity. Velo fades with age. Mo had a single pitch that moved so much yet he could command it to a dot that he aged really well. He could easily have pitched another few years. He posted a 2.11ERA and saved 41 games as a 43 year old. That’s f***ing mind boggling!

Posted (edited)
The sox are heading into 2019 with two consecutive years of being over the lux tax. In 2018, the sox were the only team to surpass the final threshold. The sox are going to get a 30% tax this year with a 42.5% surtax for going over the final line. Next year, the lux tax penalties are 50% with a 45% surtax over the final line. Every penny over that line will be taxed at 95%??!?! This year, the few mil they are over the final line is being taxed at 72.5%. Not good, but far better than another jump.

 

Not true. We were under the cap in 2017. So going into 2019, we are going into it with 1 year of tax limit payroll.

Edited by Nick
Posted
That’s the rub. The Sox payroll was under the cap but when you include medicals, they were over. Hence, the Sox have now been in the penalty phase for two seasons

 

cots had us at $233M on 7/18/18. That is counting the $14M to player benefits. I think we structured the Eovaldi and Pearce trades to help us stay just unter the $40M over mark.

 

 

Posted
Maybe the best ever? It isn’t close. He’s the GOAT. And I don’t think he’ll ever be dethroned. Akin to how Jerry Rice will never be dethroned as the best WR of all time. Nowadays, closers have a two pitch mix with obscene velocity. Velo fades with age. Mo had a single pitch that moved so much yet he could command it to a dot that he aged really well. He could easily have pitched another few years. He posted a 2.11ERA and saved 41 games as a 43 year old. That’s f***ing mind boggling!

 

It's always good to have memories when the present is disappointing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...