Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

With Brock at 2B day-to-day (sic) and Nunez 3B dinged up from the rundown play at the plate, did I read somewhere that Swihart, along with being a potential fill-in in LF, has played some 3B?

 

After watching J.D. make some nice catches in RF tonight, particularly the catch he made running face first into the wall, it got me to thinking. After this weekend, the Sox play 3 games against the cellar-dweller Orioles who are having a fire sale and no one knows who they'll have available on the field. Now might be the ideal time for a bit of a shakeup to give those dinged up a chance to fully recover. And against the lowly Orioles, what could possibly go wrong?

 

Betts 2B

Benintendi LF

Martinez RF

Pearce DH

Moreland 1B

Bogaerts SS

Swihart 3B

Leon C

Bradley CF

Edited by dustcover
  • Replies 341
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted
With Brock at 2B day-to-day (sic) and Nunez 3B dinged up from the rundown play at the plate, did I read somewhere that Swihart, along with being a potential fill-in in LF, has played some 3B?

 

After watching J.D. make some nice catches in RF tonight, particularly the catch he made running face first into the wall, it got me to thinking. After this weekend, the Sox play 3 games against the cellar-dweller Orioles who are having a fire sale and no one knows who they'll have available on the field. Now might be the ideal time for a bit of a shakeup to give those dinged up a chance to fully recover. And against the lowly Orioles, what could possibly go wrong?

 

Betts 2B

Benintendi LF

Martinez RF

Pearce DH

Moreland 1B

Bogaerts SS

Swihart 3B

Leon C

Bradley CF

 

With Swihart being needed as our back up catcher, the Sox will not play Swihart at other positions unless absolutely necessary.

 

Besides, Devers is being activated from the DL tomorrow.

Posted

If the Sox were to play Swihart at another position and he was needed as the backup catcher during the game, Cora could always do a double switch, ala National League, for instance by pinch hitting for Leon and switching Swihart from 3B to catcher while inserting the pinch hitter to 3B. Or if Leon were injured in a game, heaven forbid, a similar switch in positions could be made.

 

But as you have pointed out, with Devers coming off the DL, my machinations with the roster are not yet necessary. However, it's not beyond the realm of plausibility that this roster experiment might be kept on the back burner in the event that further injuries keep mounting as the season winds down.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
But then if Swihart gets hurt while playing 3b, it does put the Sox in a potentially precarious position. There is a reason teams rarely pinch hit for even the weakest hitting of catchers...
Posted

Haven't seen any real update on the depth of Holt's contusion, but as others said, probably a week or so assuming no structural damage or laceration. Nunez has played extensively all year mostly at full speed for him and that rundown was another shot at his legs, but he did get the out. Swihart is limited to the bench as Leon's Backup. Lin is a backup's backup. Among Pearce, Bradley, Martinez and Moreland , one has to be sitting in a given game, and it won't likely be JDM. This is a "short" bench with 2 of the guys being AAAA'ers.

 

My point is that DD and Cora need to take a hard look at the 13 pitchers, including the PawSox fill-ins and get down to 12 and put another functional player on the bench. Brandon Phillips will likely get this chance soon. Nunez and Holt should have been the ones to provide veteran utility presence playing 2 or 3 times a week but have become full time infielders due to Pedroia's lingering problems. Still the team is set for it's 70th win, with no other team beyond 65.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
If Michael Chavis hadn't gotten himself suspended, he'd probably be up here right now. We might see him anyway if things get desperate.
Posted
If Michael Chavis hadn't gotten himself suspended, he'd probably be up here right now. We might see him anyway if things get desperate.

 

That is a thought, although he is talked about as trade bait.

Posted
While we are on the subject of Blake Swihart, since June 30 he has been playing regularly and not only has he played reasonably well behind the plate but in an admittedly small sample size he is hitting .421/1.003-and he has stolen at least one base. I have been advocating that he get his chance for a long time, not knowing if he would succeed. So far he has.
Posted
I have absolutely no problem with SWI catching. From what I've seen he's done quite well. I do have a problem with Nunez playing 2nd.

 

The best solution for the SOX, both defensively and offensively, IMHO, is to platoon Devers and Nunez at 3rd and have Lin play 2nd, at least until Holt returns. After Holt returns, I never want to see Nunez at 2nd.

Posted (edited)
The best solution for the SOX, both defensively and offensively, IMHO, is to platoon Devers and Nunez at 3rd and have Lin play 2nd, at least until Holt returns. After Holt returns, I never want to see Nunez at 2nd.

 

This alignment makes a lot of sense since Devers would still get the most AB's (vs RH'ers). Nunez gets off his feet/knees for a couple days at a time. Can Holt sit on days Price pitches so the 1-4-3 DP won't risk Holt on a throw from Price, assuming David can handle the ground ball.

 

Not a Swihart cheerleader , but I wonder how many guys out there who have not played meaningful MiLB nor MLB games at catcher in 3 years can step in with very few reps and handle the mental and physical aspects of a MLB catcher ? Not many. It takes smarts, strenth, versatility, quick thinking, pitcher and hitter knowledge (with bench help), a good arm and oh BTW, you are expected to hit also. Swihart gave up an entire season due to his unfamiliarity with the ridiculous quirk known as the LF roll up door at Fenway.

 

Anyone is free to rip Nunez and Swihart , like I rip Carson Smith, Joe Kelly and Matt Barnes (forget Thornburg now) but right now you are dependent on these sub/scrubs for 2 critical positions 2B and catcher. Just IMO.

 

Devers learning ( or not) the game at the MLB level reminds us of Shaw and Middlebrooks, plus the seecond year struggles after a quick intro late the previous season of Benetendi and Bogaerts. It will be boom or bust going forward.

Edited by vegasbob
Posted
This alignment makes a lot of sense since Devers would still get the most AB's (vs RH'ers). Nunez gets off his feet/knees for a couple days at a time. Can Holt sit on days Price pitches so the 1-4-3 DP won't risk Holt on a throw from Price, assuming David can handle the ground ball.

 

Not a Swihart cheerleader , but I wonder how many guys out there who have not played meaningful MiLB nor MLB games at catcher in 3 years can step in with very few reps and handle the mental and physical aspects of a MLB catcher ? Not many. It takes smarts, strenth, versatility, quick thinking, pitcher and hitter knowledge (with bench help), a good arm and oh BTW, you are expected to hit also. Swihart gave up an entire season due to his unfamiliarity with the ridiculous quirk known as the LF roll up door at Fenway.

 

Anyone is free to rip Nunez and Swihart , like I rip Carson Smith, Joe Kelly and Matt Barnes (forget Thornburg now) but right now you are dependent on these sub/scrubs for 2 critical positions 2B and catcher. Just IMO.

 

Devers learning ( or not) the game at the MLB level reminds us of Shaw and Middlebrooks, plus the seecond year struggles after a quick intro late the previous season of Benetendi and Bogaerts. It will be boom or bust going forward.

 

Go ahead and rip Smith for his stupidity and Kelly for his mediocrity, but Barnes has an ERA of 2.30 with an ERA+ of 192- and has pitched very well. Care to take him off your s*** list?

Posted
Go ahead and rip Smith for his stupidity and Kelly for his mediocrity, but Barnes has an ERA of 2.30 with an ERA+ of 192- and has pitched very well. Care to take him off your s*** list?

 

No thanks. His stats do not make a difference when he throws the ball over the lot trying to find the strike zone. I cringe when he comes in because he basically is a thrower , not a smart pitcher. I am glad that his inabilities have not yet caught up to his stats when he throws another 25 pitch 7th inning and K's a .200 hitter on a 3-2 pitch with the bases loaded that went into the opposite batter's box.

Posted
No thanks. His stats do not make a difference when he throws the ball over the lot trying to find the strike zone. I cringe when he comes in because he basically is a thrower , not a smart pitcher. I am glad that his inabilities have not yet caught up to his stats when he throws another 25 pitch 7th inning and K's a .200 hitter on a 3-2 pitch with the bases loaded that went into the opposite batter's box.

 

Yeah sure, let's just throw the stats out the window. What do numbers mean in baseball? :rolleyes:

Posted
No thanks. His stats do not make a difference when he throws the ball over the lot trying to find the strike zone. I cringe when he comes in because he basically is a thrower , not a smart pitcher. I am glad that his inabilities have not yet caught up to his stats when he throws another 25 pitch 7th inning and K's a .200 hitter on a 3-2 pitch with the bases loaded that went into the opposite batter's box.

 

In other words, don't confuse me with the facts?

Not all opinions are created equal......it is a FACT that Barnes has been effective this year, regardless of what you may think.

Posted
In other words, don't confuse me with the facts?

Not all opinions are created equal......it is a FACT that Barnes has been effective this year, regardless of what you may think.

 

I agree. Barnes has not been a problem in the SOX BP. He's been a reliable bridge to Kimbrel.

Posted
I agree. Barnes has not been a problem in the SOX BP. He's been a reliable bridge to Kimbrel.

 

I just don't get what people are bitching about.

 

These are relievers. They run hot and cold. That is why they are not starters.

 

When they get it done no one says a peep. Have a bad game or a rough patch and there are calls for DFA.

 

Nonsense.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
While we are on the subject of Blake Swihart, since June 30 he has been playing regularly and not only has he played reasonably well behind the plate but in an admittedly small sample size he is hitting .421/1.003-and he has stolen at least one base. I have been advocating that he get his chance for a long time, not knowing if he would succeed. So far he has.

 

Swihart has held his own behind the plate. He has not shown me anything that screams "get him out of there"!

 

Good for him.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Swihart has held his own behind the plate. He has not shown me anything that screams "get him out of there"!

 

Good for him.

 

So... likelihood he is still in Boston on August 1?

Posted
Swihart has held his own behind the plate. He has not shown me anything that screams "get him out of there"!

 

Good for him.

If this continues to be the case, what will happen when Vasquez comes back? There will be no room for him on the bench with Holt, Pearce, Leon, and probably Phillips or some other second baseman.
Posted
If this continues to be the case, what will happen when Vasquez comes back? There will be no room for him on the bench with Holt, Pearce, Leon, and probably Phillips or some other second baseman.

 

Maybe Vazquez doesn't come back till September?

Posted
If this continues to be the case, what will happen when Vasquez comes back? There will be no room for him on the bench with Holt, Pearce, Leon, and probably Phillips or some other second baseman.

 

I know its still very early, but what if Swihart continues to prove he can hit the baseball and is at least decent behind the plate? Does he beat out one of our two existing catchers for a job? The two guys we have are good defensively, but neither can hit. I would not rule out Swihart earning a job.

Community Moderator
Posted
I know its still very early, but what if Swihart continues to prove he can hit the baseball and is at least decent behind the plate? Does he beat out one of our two existing catchers for a job? The two guys we have are good defensively, but neither can hit. I would not rule out Swihart earning a job.

 

1.034 OPS since July 6th! Only 4 games started though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...