Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 219
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

f*** this 17 year old punk. I say stand pat and if he does not sign then let him go off to Podunk Junior College.

 

Whoever is advising this twit should be fired. His value is not likely to be better next year. Even if he has a lights out season in juco ball he may not see the same money again. Taking that risk is just dumb.

 

Take the cash you twat. Or go s*** in your hat.

Posted
f*** this 17 year old punk. I say stand pat and if he does not sign then let him go off to Podunk Junior College.

 

Whoever is advising this twit should be fired. His value is not likely to be better next year. Even if he has a lights out season in juco ball he may not see the same money again. Taking that risk is just dumb.

 

Take the cash you twat. Or go s*** in your hat.

And if the twits in the FO to your suggested negotiation approach with this twat, I have no doubt they he would already be signed. Maybe I am wrong. Maybe DD has some balls. The last 2 GMs wold lose a negotiation with themselves.
Posted (edited)

Why is he a punk, twat, etc.? Lol...let's wait until the deadline passes with no deal before freaking out. Until then, it is just negotiation.

 

I agree that it would be unwise for him not to sign for several reasons, but at the same time, this might be the only big payout he ever gets from baseball, and there's nothing wrong with him making sure he gets the best deal that he possibly can. By the end of Friday, he will be a Red Sox (in my expert opinion, of course :P).

Edited by Jack Flap
Posted

I don't know why everyone is freaking out, we were told this would happen.

 

The kid was told he could go #1 for almost a year leading up until the draft, he had a price tag and the Sox have a budget. He fell far enough that his price tag was impossible to meet, the Sox new that, his agent knows that and everyone said the negotiations would go right up until the deadline. This is not unnatural.

 

I have no ideal what the conversation is but it's probably something like this. Groome and his agent are asking for 4.5 million, the Sox have offered 3.5, they are both posturing and will eventually settle somewhere around 4 million. I was earlier optimistic that the real number could be as low as 3.75-3.8 but admittedly I'm optimistic that number could easily be 4 million to 4.2 million. But both sides likely have the capacity to budge. You don't go to a negotiation table with your best offer.

 

Often guys are drafted with an agreement of what it will take to sign them, when a guy like Groome falls things change because the Sox probably weren't in contact with his agent due to the fact that no one knew he would drop that far. That doesn't mean they didn't have preliminary talks on draft day with ballpark figures and an understanding that they thought a deal could get done. I have a hard to time believing they would draft him if they didn't think they had a good shot at signing him.

 

Relax, to reiterate my points, this is a negotiation and it was said in the very beginning by everyone in the know that it would go right down to the wire. I'm 95% sure he signs by the end of this week.

Posted
And if the twits in the FO to your suggested negotiation approach with this twat, I have no doubt they he would already be signed. Maybe I am wrong. Maybe DD has some balls. The last 2 GMs wold lose a negotiation with themselves.

 

OK I'll bite.

 

Other than Carl Crawford, Epstein's record in negotiations was fine.

Posted
It will be very exciting to see a system that has Groome, Espinoza, and Kopech in it. I understand the Sox have a poor track records with pitchers in recent years but to be fair it's been over a decade since they had a trio that talented.
Community Moderator
Posted
Relax, to reiterate my points, this is a negotiation and it was said in the very beginning by everyone in the know that it would go right down to the wire. I'm 95% sure he signs by the end of this week.

 

Basically, this. It's just a negotiation guys and gal. There's no reason to get all that sand in your underpants.

Posted
Thanks for explaining it all much better than I could, Hugh. Not sure why some people seem to be taking this so far pretty unremarkable process personally.
Posted
The overpays for Dice k and Lugo were extreme.

 

The overpay for Dice-K supposedly had a lot to do with developing a market and building a reputation, although that doesn't seem to have paid any dividends but what did Lugo get??? 3 years 26 million for a guy who was average to better for an offensive SS with above average defense? While not the deal of the century that wasn't exactly a gross overpay either.

Community Moderator
Posted
The overpays for Dice k and Lugo were extreme.

 

DiceK only took money and he helped to win a WS. It was a good signing.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Thanks for explaining it all much better than I could, Hugh. Not sure why some people seem to be taking this so far pretty unremarkable process personally.

 

Agreed, Hugh did a good job of explaining it.

 

I can understand where Spud is coming from though. He may be a little harsh and he may be jumping the gun a bit, as it seems like the deal will get done. But if it doesn't, I would have the sense of this kid being a little too full of himself. He's 17, he's being offered $3.5 mil, and that's not good enough? I would be disheartened.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
And if the twits in the FO to your suggested negotiation approach with this twat, I have no doubt they he would already be signed. Maybe I am wrong. Maybe DD has some balls. The last 2 GMs wold lose a negotiation with themselves.

 

The last two GMs, while not without fault, were awesome. It's a shame that you can't give them any credit.

Posted
The last two GMs, while not without fault, were awesome. It's a shame that you can't give them any credit.

 

I don't think they should be bundled together, it makes our debates even messier than they already are - if that's possible. :)

Posted
The last two GMs, while not without fault, were awesome. It's a shame that you can't give them any credit.
Don't take it so personally. I have little regard for any of the overpaid FO knuckleheads in MLB. Anyone with some business savy can eat their lunch.
Posted
I don't think they should be bundled together, it makes our debates even messier than they already are - if that's possible. :)
I bundle them all together. They are all overpaid knuckleheads. It is just a matter of degree.
Posted
Agreed, Hugh did a good job of explaining it.

 

I can understand where Spud is coming from though. He may be a little harsh and he may be jumping the gun a bit, as it seems like the deal will get done. But if it doesn't, I would have the sense of this kid being a little too full of himself. He's 17, he's being offered $3.5 mil, and that's not good enough? I would be disheartened.

 

 

Well, I certainly know what I'd do, but unfortunately I've never been in the position of having to decide whether or not to take $3.5 million. :(

 

My guess is the Red Sox have room to do a bit better, Groome and his camp know this, and after some further haggling they will come to a deal.

Posted
The overpay for Dice-K supposedly had a lot to do with developing a market and building a reputation, although that doesn't seem to have paid any dividends but what did Lugo get??? 3 years 26 million for a guy who was average to better for an offensive SS with above average defense? While not the deal of the century that wasn't exactly a gross overpay either.
Lucchino admitted that there were no income stream from Japan created as a result of signing Dice K. Also, just form a negotiation standpoint and gauging the market, they overshot the closest bid by $16 or 18 million with their bid of $52 million.
Posted
DiceK only took money and he helped to win a WS. It was a good signing.
I am and was glad that we got him. We are discussing the negotiating acumen of our FO who I claimed would lose a negotiation if they negotiated with themselves.
Posted
The overpay for Dice-K supposedly had a lot to do with developing a market and building a reputation, although that doesn't seem to have paid any dividends but what did Lugo get??? 3 years 26 million for a guy who was average to better for an offensive SS with above average defense? While not the deal of the century that wasn't exactly a gross overpay either.
Do you really want to give the FO a feather for the Lugo contract?
Posted (edited)
Agreed, Hugh did a good job of explaining it.

 

I can understand where Spud is coming from though. He may be a little harsh and he may be jumping the gun a bit, as it seems like the deal will get done. But if it doesn't, I would have the sense of this kid being a little too full of himself. He's 17, he's being offered $3.5 mil, and that's not good enough? I would be disheartened.

 

This is how I see it. Yes, I think 3.5-4.2 mil is stupid money for someone who is 17 and never faced high end baseball talent.

 

I don't have any sand in my panties. I just don't like the way money is thrown around for unproven talent. The guy is not Spencer Haywood or Kevin Garnet.

 

I'm not jumping the gun , either. I said stand pat as in "that's what we got for you kid. Take it or leave it."

Edited by Spudboy
Posted
This is how I see it. Yes, I think 3.5-4.2 mil is stupid money for someone who is 17 and never faced high end baseball talent.

 

I don't have any sand in my panties. I just don't like the way money is thrown around for unproven talent. The guy is not Spencer Haywood or Kevin Garnet.

I agree. I really don't care whether he signs or not, because he will not be coming to Fenway for 5 years under the best of circumstances. I will shake my head that the momos in the FO wasted a high first round pick if they don't get it done. Maybe they can retain one of those Dominican Agents who has a bag of untraceable cash to help them get it done.
Posted
I agree. I really don't care whether he signs or not, because he will not be coming to Fenway for 5 years under the best of circumstances. I will shake my head that the momos in the FO wasted a high first round pick if they don't get it done. Maybe they can retain one of those Dominican Agents who has a bag of untraceable cash to help them get it done.

 

Ah, money laundering. The true Dominican pastime.

Posted
Don't take it so personally. I have little regard for any of the overpaid FO knuckleheads in MLB. Anyone with some business savy can eat their lunch.

 

Well, they should be doing it then.

Community Moderator
Posted
My only concern is: Another dynamic in play, according to Speier, is that Groome hasn’t yet taken a physical in advance of Friday’s deadline. All things considered, though, the Red Sox will surely be highly motivated to sign him — a big lefty with good velocity and and a terrific curve would be a strong addition to any farm system.
Posted
Do you really want to give the FO a feather for the Lugo contract?

 

No, but I wouldn't call it an "extreme overpay" either. Your points on Dice-K however seem more fair.

Posted

‏@alexspeier

Source: Red Sox deal w/1st-rounder Jason Groome 'getting closer,' 'should get done,' though final bonus figure still being discussed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...